RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS

    On the Relation between Phonetics and Phonology

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104724435

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examines the nature of the relationship between phonology and phonetics and advocates a modular view in which there is a principled mapping between phonological representations and phonetic expressions. In particular, this modular view is advocated by Laboratory Phonology that can be characterized by two beliefs. First, it is believed that there should be a division between phonetics and phonology. Second, there should be a considerable interconnection between them. Contrary to this modular view, other approaches are somewhat radical in that abstract phonological features are not associated with phonetic facts and that phonetics and phonology are integrated into a single module which is all phonetic. In favor of the modular theory, I propose a principle about phonology-phonetics interface: unmarked items display a wider range of phonetic realization but cannot be realized in a more marked way than their marked counterparts. One representative evidence would be that the higher pitch value of a tone compared with other tones has to be a phonological high tone rather than a low tone. Further discussions about phonology-phonetics interface are done with regard to speech perception and production. It is shown that perception and production data are valid when they are used as phonetic evidence to resolve phonological controversies. On the other hand, the P-map hypothesis seems invalid when dealing with some cases where speech production and perception do not match.
    번역하기

    This study examines the nature of the relationship between phonology and phonetics and advocates a modular view in which there is a principled mapping between phonological representations and phonetic expressions. In particular, this modular view is a...

    This study examines the nature of the relationship between phonology and phonetics and advocates a modular view in which there is a principled mapping between phonological representations and phonetic expressions. In particular, this modular view is advocated by Laboratory Phonology that can be characterized by two beliefs. First, it is believed that there should be a division between phonetics and phonology. Second, there should be a considerable interconnection between them. Contrary to this modular view, other approaches are somewhat radical in that abstract phonological features are not associated with phonetic facts and that phonetics and phonology are integrated into a single module which is all phonetic. In favor of the modular theory, I propose a principle about phonology-phonetics interface: unmarked items display a wider range of phonetic realization but cannot be realized in a more marked way than their marked counterparts. One representative evidence would be that the higher pitch value of a tone compared with other tones has to be a phonological high tone rather than a low tone. Further discussions about phonology-phonetics interface are done with regard to speech perception and production. It is shown that perception and production data are valid when they are used as phonetic evidence to resolve phonological controversies. On the other hand, the P-map hypothesis seems invalid when dealing with some cases where speech production and perception do not match.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Anderson, Stephen R., "Why phonology isn't 'natural'" 12 : 493-539, 1981

    2 Rice, Keren, "Tonal markedness in three Athapaskan languages" 2000

    3 Ohala, John J., "There is no interface between phonology and phonetics: a personal view" 18 : 153-171, 1990

    4 Vago, Robert M., "Theoretical implications of Hungarian vowel harmony" 7 : 243-263, 1976

    5 Chang, Woohyeok, "The use of phonetic evidence to resolve phonological controversies" University of Delaware 2002

    6 Ohala, John J., "The relation between phonetics and phonology, In The Handbook of Phonetic Science" Blackwell publishers 674-694, 1997

    7 Keating, Patricia A., "The phonology-phonetics interface, In Linguistics: the Cambridge Survey" Cambridge University Press 281-302, 1988

    8 Steriade, Donca, "The phonology of perceptibility effects: The P-map and its consequences for constraint organization" University of California at Los Angeles 2001

    9 Pierrehumbert, Janet, "The phonology and phonetics of English intonation" MIT 1980

    10 Kingston, John, "The phonetics of Athabaskan Tonogenesis" University of Massachusetts 2002

    1 Anderson, Stephen R., "Why phonology isn't 'natural'" 12 : 493-539, 1981

    2 Rice, Keren, "Tonal markedness in three Athapaskan languages" 2000

    3 Ohala, John J., "There is no interface between phonology and phonetics: a personal view" 18 : 153-171, 1990

    4 Vago, Robert M., "Theoretical implications of Hungarian vowel harmony" 7 : 243-263, 1976

    5 Chang, Woohyeok, "The use of phonetic evidence to resolve phonological controversies" University of Delaware 2002

    6 Ohala, John J., "The relation between phonetics and phonology, In The Handbook of Phonetic Science" Blackwell publishers 674-694, 1997

    7 Keating, Patricia A., "The phonology-phonetics interface, In Linguistics: the Cambridge Survey" Cambridge University Press 281-302, 1988

    8 Steriade, Donca, "The phonology of perceptibility effects: The P-map and its consequences for constraint organization" University of California at Los Angeles 2001

    9 Pierrehumbert, Janet, "The phonology and phonetics of English intonation" MIT 1980

    10 Kingston, John, "The phonetics of Athabaskan Tonogenesis" University of Massachusetts 2002

    11 Fudge, E. C., "The nature of phonological primes" 3 : 1-36, 1967

    12 Kim, Sun-hoi, "The metrical computation in tone assignment" University of Delaware 1999

    13 Chomsky, Noam, "The Sound Pattern of English" Harper and Row 1968

    14 Flemming, Edward, "Scalar and categorical phenomena in a unified model of phonetics and phonology" 18 : 7-44, 2001

    15 Hjelmslev, Louis, "Prolegomena to a Theory of Language" University of Wisconsin Press 1953

    16 Steriade, Donca, "Positional neutralization" 1993

    17 Steriade, Donca, "Phonetics in phonology: the case of laryngeal neutralization" University of California at Los Angeles 1997

    18 Cohn, Abigail C., "Phonetics and phonology" 10 : 1-37, 1995

    19 Francis, Alexander L., "Phonetics and phonological theory" 16 : 381-393, 1996

    20 Hayes, Bruce, "Phonetically driven phonology: the role of Optimality Theory and inductive grounding" 1997

    21 장우혁, "Phonetic evidence for phonological markedness of tone in North Kyungsang Korean" 한국음운론학회 11 (11): 491-506, 2005

    22 Flemming, Edward, "Phonetic detail in phonology: toward a unified account of assimilation and coarticulation" University of Arizona 1997

    23 Cohn, Abigail C., "Phonetic and phonological rules of nasalization" University of California at Los Angeles 1990

    24 Flemming, Edward, "Perceptual features in phonology" University of California at Los Angeles 1995

    25 Kabak, Baris, "Perceptual distortions in the adaptation of English consonant clusters: syllable structure or consonantal contact constraints?" 50 : 23-52, 2007

    26 Howe, Darin, "Patterns and timing of glottalisation" 18 : 45-80, 2001

    27 Arvaniti, Amalia, "On the relationship between phonology and phonetics (or why phonetics is not phonology)" 19-24, 2007

    28 Inagaki, Masayuki, "Narada no Hogen (The dialect of Narada)" Yamanashi Minzoku no Kai 1957

    29 장우혁, "Markedness of feature in English laryngeal contrast" 한국음운론학회 13 (13): 123-149, 2007

    30 Lombardi, Linda, "Laryngeal features and laryngeal neutralization" University of Massachusetts at Amherst 1991

    31 Pierrehumbert, Janet, "Japanese Tone Structure" MIT Press 1988

    32 Gussenhoven Carlos, "Introduction: phonetics in phonology" 18 : 1-6, 2001

    33 Keating, Patricia A., "Introduction, In Papers in Laboratory Phonology III: Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form" Cambridge University Press 1-4, 1994

    34 Beckman, Mary E., "Introduction, In Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech" Cambridge University Press 1-16, 1990

    35 Beckman, Mary E., "Intonational structure in Japanese and English" 3 : 255-310, 1986

    36 Boersma, Paul, "Functional phonology" University of Amsterdam 1998

    37 Foley, James, "Foundations of Theoretical Phonology" Cambridge University Press 1977

    38 Kirchner, Robert, "Contrastiveness and faithfulness" 14 : 83-111, 1997

    39 Postal, Paul M., "Aspects of phonological Theory" Harper & Row Publishers 1968

    40 Kirchner, Robert, "An effort-based approach to consonant lenition" University of California at Los Angeles 1998

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2012-09-18 학회명변경 영문명 : Center for the Study of Language and Information -> Institute for the Study of Language and Information KCI등재
    2010-05-17 학회명변경 한글명 : 언어연구소 -> 언어정보연구소
    영문명 : Center for the Study of Language -> Center for the Study of Language and Information
    KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-03-23 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Linguistic Research KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.42 0.42 0.45
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.4 0.43 1.123 0.1
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼