RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    都市計劃 過程에 있어서 住民參與 擴大方案에 관한 硏究 = (A) study on the civil participation in the process of urban planning

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8173528

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      서울 : 건국대학교 행정대학원, 2001

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(석사) -- 건국대학교 행정대학원 , 부동산학과 , 2001

    • 발행연도

      2001

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • KDC

      539.7 판사항(4)

    • 발행국(도시)

      서울

    • 형태사항

      v, 124p. : 삽도 ; 27cm .

    • 일반주기명

      참고문헌: p. 117-121

    • 소장기관
      • 건국대학교 GLOCAL(글로컬)캠퍼스 중원도서관 소장기관정보
      • 건국대학교 상허기념도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    System that inhabitants could participate directly at urban planning process of our country so far is opinion presentation through ancient poetry or formula inspection after dictionary formula inspection and decision ago urban planning decision, and public forum· formula inspection etc. In city master plan was system effectively.
    But, in July 2000, city plan statute expects more because systematic device that inhabitants can do direction draft at urban planning draft step being revised sharply is readied that inhabitants participation is magnified. But, public forum is not introduced systematically at urban planning draft step still, and because local society and Urban Planning Committee are not displaying several functions, is real condition that is not becoming substantial inhabitants participation.
    This inhabitants participation can present the following alternative to overcome limit and becomes genuine inhabitants participation in urban planning process.
    First, secure inhabitants participation systematically at city plan process on Town Planning and Zoning Act.
    At urban planning process, introduce public forum systematically, and so that do to string dictionary formula inspection period and magnify width of inhabitants' draft proposal gradually and local meeting virtual function can be guaranteed inquiry function gradual conversion as decision function need, and also, must strengthen operation of Urban -Planning Committee more.
    Second, it must activate inhabitants participation of various forms at urban planning process. For example, local residents who employ basis investigation business part in local government enough utilize or, way etc. that hold briefing session to direction inhabitants about main contents of urban planning can grope.
    Third, make up environment that active inhabitants participation can be guaranteed at urban planning process.
    Therefore, junta need to publicize enough city plan beforehand and urban planning draft and decision stage are transparent and should be operated democratically so that it may not be possession of misunderstanding and disbelief about inhabitants' concerns.
    Fourth, it is establishment of democratic sense of values of relation administration first engineer, specialist, local residents that participate at urban planning process.
    Therefore, relation administration first engineer who sleep decisive power of urban planning must recognize that city planning determination that there is no inhabitants' participation in urban planning process causes disbelief and discord finally.
    In the meantime, when inhabitants recognize what not reverse for ocean reverse but genuine participation for area development is in some urban planning, city sees that is developed by inhabitants.
    번역하기

    System that inhabitants could participate directly at urban planning process of our country so far is opinion presentation through ancient poetry or formula inspection after dictionary formula inspection and decision ago urban planning decision, and p...

    System that inhabitants could participate directly at urban planning process of our country so far is opinion presentation through ancient poetry or formula inspection after dictionary formula inspection and decision ago urban planning decision, and public forum· formula inspection etc. In city master plan was system effectively.
    But, in July 2000, city plan statute expects more because systematic device that inhabitants can do direction draft at urban planning draft step being revised sharply is readied that inhabitants participation is magnified. But, public forum is not introduced systematically at urban planning draft step still, and because local society and Urban Planning Committee are not displaying several functions, is real condition that is not becoming substantial inhabitants participation.
    This inhabitants participation can present the following alternative to overcome limit and becomes genuine inhabitants participation in urban planning process.
    First, secure inhabitants participation systematically at city plan process on Town Planning and Zoning Act.
    At urban planning process, introduce public forum systematically, and so that do to string dictionary formula inspection period and magnify width of inhabitants' draft proposal gradually and local meeting virtual function can be guaranteed inquiry function gradual conversion as decision function need, and also, must strengthen operation of Urban -Planning Committee more.
    Second, it must activate inhabitants participation of various forms at urban planning process. For example, local residents who employ basis investigation business part in local government enough utilize or, way etc. that hold briefing session to direction inhabitants about main contents of urban planning can grope.
    Third, make up environment that active inhabitants participation can be guaranteed at urban planning process.
    Therefore, junta need to publicize enough city plan beforehand and urban planning draft and decision stage are transparent and should be operated democratically so that it may not be possession of misunderstanding and disbelief about inhabitants' concerns.
    Fourth, it is establishment of democratic sense of values of relation administration first engineer, specialist, local residents that participate at urban planning process.
    Therefore, relation administration first engineer who sleep decisive power of urban planning must recognize that city planning determination that there is no inhabitants' participation in urban planning process causes disbelief and discord finally.
    In the meantime, when inhabitants recognize what not reverse for ocean reverse but genuine participation for area development is in some urban planning, city sees that is developed by inhabitants.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차
    • 第1章 序論 = 1
    • 第1節 硏究의 目的 = 1
    • 第2節 硏究 의 範圍 및 方法 = 2
    • 第2章 都市計劃體系와 住民參與의 一般的 考察 = 4
    • 목차
    • 第1章 序論 = 1
    • 第1節 硏究의 目的 = 1
    • 第2節 硏究 의 範圍 및 方法 = 2
    • 第2章 都市計劃體系와 住民參與의 一般的 考察 = 4
    • 第1節 都市計劃體系 = 4
    • 1. 國土 및 都市計劃關聯法 體系 = 4
    • 2. 都市計劃法의 變遷 沿革 = 7
    • 3. 都市計劃法에서의 都市計劃體系 = 13
    • 4. 都市計劃의 法的 性質 = 15
    • 第2節 住民參與 = 24
    • 1. 住民參與의 意義 = 24
    • 2. 住民參與의 必要性의 根據 = 26
    • 3. 住民參與의 類型 = 30
    • 4. 住民參與의 機能 = 37
    • 5. 住民參與의 實態分析 = 39
    • 第3節 都市計劃類型別 住民參與 = 42
    • 1. 廣域都市計劃 = 42
    • 2. 都市基本計劃 = 45
    • 3. 都市計劃 = 48
    • 4. 都市計劃施設 事業計劃 = 56
    • 5. 都市開發法에 의한 都市開發區域指定과 開發計劃 = 58
    • 6. 都市再開發法에 의한 都市再開發 基本計劃 = 62
    • 第4節 外國의 都市計劃過程에서의 住民參與制度 = 64
    • 1. 獨逸 = 64
    • 2. 日本 = 65
    • 3. 英國 = 66
    • 4. 美國 = 67
    • 5. 프랑스 = 69
    • 第3章 都市計劃過程에서의 段階別 住民參與의 事例分析 = 72
    • 第1節 都市計劃過程의 段階別 區分 = 72
    • 1. 計劃段階 = 72
    • 2. 執行段階 = 73
    • 3. 評價段階 = 73
    • 第2節 都市計劃過程의 計劃段階別 住民參與 事例分析 = 74
    • 1. 計劃段階에서의 住民參與 = 74
    • 가. 山本 쓰레기 燒却場 立地를 둘러 싼 葛藤 = 74
    • 나. 安山市 都市計劃過程에서의 移住民對策 = 78
    • 다. 江西區 體育施設 建立에 대한 葛藤 = 81
    • 라. 獨逸 함부르크市 오텐센地區 開發事業에서의 住民參與 = 84
    • 2. 執行段階에서의 住民參與 = 88
    • 가. 獨逸 베를린 크로이즈베르그區域 再開發事業에서의住民參與 = 88
    • 3. 評價段階에서의 住民參與 = 93
    • 가. 화성 特定廢棄物處理施設의 立地 및 可動을 둘러 싼 葛藤 = 93
    • 第4章 都市計劃過程에서의 住民參與의 限界와 擴大方案 = 96
    • 第1節 住民參與의 限界性 = 96
    • 第2節 現行都市計劃法制度下에서의 住民參與의 限界 = 98
    • 1. 都市計劃立案의 住民提案 = 98
    • 2. 公聽會 = 98
    • 3. 公告·供覽 = 100
    • 4. 地方議會의 意見聽取 = 103
    • 5. 都市計劃委員會 = 104
    • 6. 小結 = 105
    • 第3節 都市計劃過程에서의 住民參與 擴大方案 = 107
    • 1. 住民參與 擴大 必要性의 論據 = 107
    • 2. 都市計劃 過程의 段階別 住民參與 擴大方案 = 108
    • 가. 都市計劃立案. 檢討段階 = 108
    • 나. 都市計劃 執行段階 = 112
    • 다. 都市計劃 評價段階 = 112
    • 第6章 結論 = 117
    • <參考文獻> = 119
    • ABSTRACT = 122
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼