RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    진주의 중심성과 문화예술도시로의 재구성 = The Jinju’s Centrality and the Restructuring of Jinju as a City of Culture and Arts

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103687669

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examines how tradition is expressed in Jinju, where the so-called ‘tradition’ operates strongly, how that tradition unite the citizens of Jinju, and how the Jinju citizens are trying to restructure the city based on their experiences and historical transmission.
    A notable aspect among Jinju’s historical experiences is that it was an administrative center. The fact that Jinju has been referred to as the center of Gyeongsangnam-do and the center of West Gyeongnam region originates from the historical experience of the city as an administrative center.
    The reason Jinju seriously lost its municipal standing was because of the relocation of Gyeongsangnam-do provincial government building in 1925. Jinju, which was located outside the zone of modern railway and open ports since the modern open port era, was already being excluded as a place lagging behind in transportation. With the relocation of Gyeongsangnam-do provincial government building, the people of Jinju suffered a great loss.
    Several measures were taken as recover from the loss Jinju experienced. First, the people of Jinju had to claw back ‘the provincial government building that was lost’ in order to retain its status as a city. Whenever Jinju had to confront other areas with current issues, the people of Jinju called attention to the Gyeongsangnam-do provincial government building as a way to regain the past status of Jinju and stop its further decline. The problem of the provincial government building remained as a memory and experience among Jinju people and their efforts for reclaiming the provincial government building and envy for being a center of Gyeongsangnam-do became the source of competition and jealousy with other areas within Gyeongsangnam-do.
    Jinju, after its loss of provincial government building, went on to restructure itself as a culture and arts city based on the city’s inherent history and cultural resources as well as on the cultural capacity of its people in order to build its new centrality. It relied on the history of Jinju that no other new modern industrialized cities could compete with and mobilized historical events that demonstrate the symbolic historicity of Jinju in the general history of Korea. In addition, as the origin of culture that is symbolized in the Gaecheon Art Festival, Jinju became a leader of culture that received recognition on a national level. Besides, the city united the people of Jinju and the internal energy of the city noting the ‘Jinju Spirit’ which is based on historical consciousness. Also, it is establishing the city image as a city of culture and arts while embracing cultural resources that were acquired unexpectedly from outside. In particular, one thing that have been frequently mentioned in the course of restructuring of Jinju as a city of culture and arts was the Japanese invasion of Korea in 1592. The Japanese invasion of Korea in 1592 operated as an important mechanism for restructuring Jinju as a city of culture and arts rooted in tradition and building Jinju’s unique identity.
    번역하기

    This study examines how tradition is expressed in Jinju, where the so-called ‘tradition’ operates strongly, how that tradition unite the citizens of Jinju, and how the Jinju citizens are trying to restructure the city based on their experiences an...

    This study examines how tradition is expressed in Jinju, where the so-called ‘tradition’ operates strongly, how that tradition unite the citizens of Jinju, and how the Jinju citizens are trying to restructure the city based on their experiences and historical transmission.
    A notable aspect among Jinju’s historical experiences is that it was an administrative center. The fact that Jinju has been referred to as the center of Gyeongsangnam-do and the center of West Gyeongnam region originates from the historical experience of the city as an administrative center.
    The reason Jinju seriously lost its municipal standing was because of the relocation of Gyeongsangnam-do provincial government building in 1925. Jinju, which was located outside the zone of modern railway and open ports since the modern open port era, was already being excluded as a place lagging behind in transportation. With the relocation of Gyeongsangnam-do provincial government building, the people of Jinju suffered a great loss.
    Several measures were taken as recover from the loss Jinju experienced. First, the people of Jinju had to claw back ‘the provincial government building that was lost’ in order to retain its status as a city. Whenever Jinju had to confront other areas with current issues, the people of Jinju called attention to the Gyeongsangnam-do provincial government building as a way to regain the past status of Jinju and stop its further decline. The problem of the provincial government building remained as a memory and experience among Jinju people and their efforts for reclaiming the provincial government building and envy for being a center of Gyeongsangnam-do became the source of competition and jealousy with other areas within Gyeongsangnam-do.
    Jinju, after its loss of provincial government building, went on to restructure itself as a culture and arts city based on the city’s inherent history and cultural resources as well as on the cultural capacity of its people in order to build its new centrality. It relied on the history of Jinju that no other new modern industrialized cities could compete with and mobilized historical events that demonstrate the symbolic historicity of Jinju in the general history of Korea. In addition, as the origin of culture that is symbolized in the Gaecheon Art Festival, Jinju became a leader of culture that received recognition on a national level. Besides, the city united the people of Jinju and the internal energy of the city noting the ‘Jinju Spirit’ which is based on historical consciousness. Also, it is establishing the city image as a city of culture and arts while embracing cultural resources that were acquired unexpectedly from outside. In particular, one thing that have been frequently mentioned in the course of restructuring of Jinju as a city of culture and arts was the Japanese invasion of Korea in 1592. The Japanese invasion of Korea in 1592 operated as an important mechanism for restructuring Jinju as a city of culture and arts rooted in tradition and building Jinju’s unique identity.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 영남문학회, "嶺文" 3 (3): 1949

    2 영남문학회, "嶺文" 3 (3): 1949

    3 박태일, "파성 설창수 문학의 이해" 경진 2011

    4 차철욱, "진주지역 논개 재현방식의 다양성" 부경역사연구소 (31) : 63-84, 2012

    5 김장하, "진주정신에 관한 소고" 13 : 1998

    6 예총진주시지부, "진주예총"

    7 "진주시청, 국가기록관 대통령기록관, 디지털진주문화대전, (사)진주문화사랑모임 등홈페이지"

    8 진주시사편찬위원회, "진주시사" 1994

    9 김수업, "진주문화를 찾아서 1- 논개" 지식산업사 2008

    10 진주문화원, "진주문화"

    1 영남문학회, "嶺文" 3 (3): 1949

    2 영남문학회, "嶺文" 3 (3): 1949

    3 박태일, "파성 설창수 문학의 이해" 경진 2011

    4 차철욱, "진주지역 논개 재현방식의 다양성" 부경역사연구소 (31) : 63-84, 2012

    5 김장하, "진주정신에 관한 소고" 13 : 1998

    6 예총진주시지부, "진주예총"

    7 "진주시청, 국가기록관 대통령기록관, 디지털진주문화대전, (사)진주문화사랑모임 등홈페이지"

    8 진주시사편찬위원회, "진주시사" 1994

    9 김수업, "진주문화를 찾아서 1- 논개" 지식산업사 2008

    10 진주문화원, "진주문화"

    11 진주문화원, "진주문화"

    12 勝田伊助, "진주대관"

    13 김중섭, "일제하 도청 이전과 주민 저항운동" 18 : 1996

    14 "시대일보"

    15 김은경, "서울시 도시브랜드 아이덴티티 접근방법과 자치구 프로모션 캐릭터 연구" 이화여자대학교 대학원 2009

    16 "매일경제신문"

    17 "동아일보"

    18 기리리명길박사문집간행위원회, "기리 리명길 박사문집 보리수 아래서" 1998

    19 이순욱, "근대 진주 지역문학의 전통과 『삼인집(三人集)』, In 파성 설창수 문학의 이해" 경진 2011

    20 김동철, "근대 부산의 교통 발달과 기록 - 기차와 전차를 중심으로 -" 한국기록관리학회 11 (11): 253-271, 2011

    21 "경향신문"

    22 "경남일보"

    23 "경남신문"

    24 경남도정백년사편찬위원회, "경남도정백년사" 1996

    25 "경남도민일보"

    26 한국예술문화단체총연합회진주지부, "개천예술제사십년사" (사)개천예술재단 1991

    27 국립진주박물관, "晋州城"

    28 손정목, "日帝下의 道廳移轉(Ⅱ)" 34 (34): 1985

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-12-02 학술지명변경 한글명 : 지역과역사 -> 지역과 역사 KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 신청제한 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1 1 0.75
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.81 0.74 1.558 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼