RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    이탈리아의 LBO규제개혁과 법적 시사점 = Italian Regulatory Reform of LBO Transactions and Some Legal Implications

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101613343

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Recently, Italian government has reformed the regulation on financial assistance by companies under the Civil Code. Following the enacted company law reform, Italy seems to have departed from an outright prohibition on merger leveraged buy-outs(MLBO) as an indirect form of financial assistance by introducing a new ad hoc article 2501-bis in its Civil Code in 2003, which de facto grants MLBOs a legitimate legal status in exchange for greater information disclosure on the resulting leverage and financial projections of the post-MLBO combined entity. Futhermore, Italy has implemented the 2006 revised EU second company law Directive relaxing restrictions on the financial assistance, and revised the former provision article 2358 of the civil code in 2008.
    Such an Italian reform of its traditional legal regime could provide greater flexibility to leveraged buy-outs(LBO) transactions. According to the reform,Italian stock corporations(SpA) are permitted to provide loans or guarantees to third parties for the acquisition or subscription of such corporation's shares. And the third party as an acquiring company provided with the financial assistance from the target is free to merge with the target without regard to its illegality, provided that certain conditions are satisfied and special procedure is followed.
    Meanwhile, we have an apparently italian-like provision article 542-9under the Korea Commercial Code. Any financial assistance like providing loans or guarantees to third parties by listed companies for the acquisition of such company's shares is prohibited in principle, but exceptionally permitted in cases where the financial assistance has the company's business purposes and has no possibility to do harm to the business integrity. But the legal framework is significantly different from Italian one and has some legal problems to be considered for keeping the traditional principle of capital maintenance, which is ignored or not required in the US corporate law regime in protecting the company's creditors. Especially, some reasonable tests for keeping fairness for LBO transactions, which are not required under the current commercial code, should be necessarily provided both in substance and procedure.
    This paper introduces the newly reformed Italian legal regime in detail and compares the two legal frameworks, based on the legal philosophy and legislative policy. Believingly, the Italian reforms on the leveraged buy-outs cast some useful legislative implications to Korean commercial Code in that two countries have similarities both in legal regime and regulatory philosophy in relation to financial assistance for the LBO transactions.
    In conclusion, this paper suggests that current regulatory environment under the Korean commercial code should be reformed modelled after the Italian reforms, especially for developing LBO market better for the future and protecting the stakeholders including creditors from company's abusive financial assistance for the acquirers. The traditional corporate dogmatic principles controlling the current legal structure of Korea corporate law need to be reasonably moderated in harmonization with the economic rationale surrounding the LBO transactions rapidly emerging in the world M&A market.
    번역하기

    Recently, Italian government has reformed the regulation on financial assistance by companies under the Civil Code. Following the enacted company law reform, Italy seems to have departed from an outright prohibition on merger leveraged buy-outs(MLBO) ...

    Recently, Italian government has reformed the regulation on financial assistance by companies under the Civil Code. Following the enacted company law reform, Italy seems to have departed from an outright prohibition on merger leveraged buy-outs(MLBO) as an indirect form of financial assistance by introducing a new ad hoc article 2501-bis in its Civil Code in 2003, which de facto grants MLBOs a legitimate legal status in exchange for greater information disclosure on the resulting leverage and financial projections of the post-MLBO combined entity. Futhermore, Italy has implemented the 2006 revised EU second company law Directive relaxing restrictions on the financial assistance, and revised the former provision article 2358 of the civil code in 2008.
    Such an Italian reform of its traditional legal regime could provide greater flexibility to leveraged buy-outs(LBO) transactions. According to the reform,Italian stock corporations(SpA) are permitted to provide loans or guarantees to third parties for the acquisition or subscription of such corporation's shares. And the third party as an acquiring company provided with the financial assistance from the target is free to merge with the target without regard to its illegality, provided that certain conditions are satisfied and special procedure is followed.
    Meanwhile, we have an apparently italian-like provision article 542-9under the Korea Commercial Code. Any financial assistance like providing loans or guarantees to third parties by listed companies for the acquisition of such company's shares is prohibited in principle, but exceptionally permitted in cases where the financial assistance has the company's business purposes and has no possibility to do harm to the business integrity. But the legal framework is significantly different from Italian one and has some legal problems to be considered for keeping the traditional principle of capital maintenance, which is ignored or not required in the US corporate law regime in protecting the company's creditors. Especially, some reasonable tests for keeping fairness for LBO transactions, which are not required under the current commercial code, should be necessarily provided both in substance and procedure.
    This paper introduces the newly reformed Italian legal regime in detail and compares the two legal frameworks, based on the legal philosophy and legislative policy. Believingly, the Italian reforms on the leveraged buy-outs cast some useful legislative implications to Korean commercial Code in that two countries have similarities both in legal regime and regulatory philosophy in relation to financial assistance for the LBO transactions.
    In conclusion, this paper suggests that current regulatory environment under the Korean commercial code should be reformed modelled after the Italian reforms, especially for developing LBO market better for the future and protecting the stakeholders including creditors from company's abusive financial assistance for the acquirers. The traditional corporate dogmatic principles controlling the current legal structure of Korea corporate law need to be reasonably moderated in harmonization with the economic rationale surrounding the LBO transactions rapidly emerging in the world M&A market.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김병연, "차입매수(LBO)와 배임죄의 적용-신한LBO 및 한일합섬LBO 사례와 관련하여-" 한국상사법학회 29 (29): 217-252, 2010

    2 송종준, "주식회사 법정자본제도의 국제적 개혁동향과 입법 과제 - 주주와 채권자의 이해조정을 중심으로 -" 한국경영법률학회 20 (20): 171-204, 2009

    3 송종준, "會社法상 LBO의 背任罪 成否와 立法課題* -신한 및 한일합섬 LBO 판결을 계기로 하여-" 한국증권법학회 10 (10): 319-363, 2009

    4 Michele Giannino, "The Regulation of LBOs under English and Italian Company Law"

    5 Marco Silvestri, "The New Italian Law on Merger Leveraged Buy-outs : A Law and Economics Perspective" 6-, 2005

    6 Luc Renneboog, "Public-to-Private Transactions : LBOs, MBOs and IBOs" ECGI 2005

    7 Ellis Ferran, "Principles of Corporate Finance Law, Oxford, 2008, Regulation of Private Equity-Backed Leveraged Buyout Activity in Europe" ECGI 2008

    8 Francesco Portolano & Manuela Cavallo, "New Rules on Italian Leveraged Buy-outs"

    9 Shearman & Sterling, "LLP" The Reform of Financial Assistance in Italy

    10 Baker & McKenzie, "Italy enacts New Regulation on Financial Assistance"

    1 김병연, "차입매수(LBO)와 배임죄의 적용-신한LBO 및 한일합섬LBO 사례와 관련하여-" 한국상사법학회 29 (29): 217-252, 2010

    2 송종준, "주식회사 법정자본제도의 국제적 개혁동향과 입법 과제 - 주주와 채권자의 이해조정을 중심으로 -" 한국경영법률학회 20 (20): 171-204, 2009

    3 송종준, "會社法상 LBO의 背任罪 成否와 立法課題* -신한 및 한일합섬 LBO 판결을 계기로 하여-" 한국증권법학회 10 (10): 319-363, 2009

    4 Michele Giannino, "The Regulation of LBOs under English and Italian Company Law"

    5 Marco Silvestri, "The New Italian Law on Merger Leveraged Buy-outs : A Law and Economics Perspective" 6-, 2005

    6 Luc Renneboog, "Public-to-Private Transactions : LBOs, MBOs and IBOs" ECGI 2005

    7 Ellis Ferran, "Principles of Corporate Finance Law, Oxford, 2008, Regulation of Private Equity-Backed Leveraged Buyout Activity in Europe" ECGI 2008

    8 Francesco Portolano & Manuela Cavallo, "New Rules on Italian Leveraged Buy-outs"

    9 Shearman & Sterling, "LLP" The Reform of Financial Assistance in Italy

    10 Baker & McKenzie, "Italy enacts New Regulation on Financial Assistance"

    11 Bruno Cova, "Italy : company law : leveraged buy-outs" 4 (4): C46-C49, 1993

    12 Douglas Cumming & Simona Zambelli, "Illegal Buyouts"

    13 Charles Proctor, "Financial Assistance : New Proposals and New Perspectives?" 28 (28): 2007

    14 Adriaan Dorresteijn, "European Corporate Law(2nd ed.)" Wolters Kluwer 2009

    15 Eddy Wymeersch, "European Company Law : The “Simpler Legislation for the Internal Market"(SLIM) Initiative of the EU Commission" University of Ghent Financial Law Institute

    16 Alessandro Giuliani, "Directive 2006/68/CE and LBO transactions in Italy, Euro. Law"

    17 Commission of the European Communities, "Communication from the Commission on a simplified business environment for companies in the areas of company law, accounting and auditing, Brussels, Aug.7"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-05-07 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> KOREAN COMMERCIAL LAW ASSOCIATION KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-10-18 학술지등록 한글명 : 상사법연구
    외국어명 : 미등록
    KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1 1 1.07
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.96 0.93 0.979 0.58
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼