옹호연합의 연합행태에 관한 실증적 연구 = 3려(여수시, 여천시, 여천군) 통합과정을 중심으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This article aims to empirically analyze the behaviors of advocacy coalitions. The AFC(Advocacy Coalition Frameworks), developed by Paul Sabatiers, has been applied to various policy sectors in Korea. The framework considers policy change as the result of learning processes within and between advocacy coalitions. However. in explaining policy change. The AFC focuses change processes of the policy belief system of advocacy coalition. In AFC studies, there have been a few attempts to account for how actors with certain policy belief systems develop and maintain these advocacy coalition.
From the literature on interdependencies. policy beliefs. coalition resources and coalition behaviors(see, for instance. Fenger and Klok. 2001; Zafonte and Sabatier, 1998; Weible and Sabatier, 2005), I designed the analysis framework. In this article. I analyzed the development and maintenance of advocacy coalitions, the coalition behaviors of actors by looking at both interdependencies and policy beliefs of the actors. and coalition resources. In Korea, the importance of this approach was demonstrated by applying it to consolidation among local governments, which was called YeoSu (United) City. Findings indicated the attention for interdependency and policy beliefs of the actors. and coalition resources contribute to explain the behaviors of actors and advocacy coalitions. And I deducted policy implications. First. advocacy coalition behaviors have changed from strong conflict to strong coordination during processes of consolidation among local governments. Second, in addition to interdependency and policy belief. political factors affected advocacy coalition behaviors. Third. public entrepreneurs playa important role in changing from strong conflict to strong coordination as to advocacy coalition behaviors.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 선행연구 및 이론적 논거
• Ⅲ. 실증적 분석 : 3려통합을 둘러싼 옹호연합의 연합행태 분석
• Ⅳ. 결론
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이헌석, "청주 청원통합과정의 문제점과 시사점, 청주 청원 공동발전을 위한 정책토론회" 충북행정학회 2009

2 김이수, "지방자치단체간 통합과정에 관한 실증적 연구 - 여수시, 여천시, 여천군의 3려(麗) 통합사례를 중심으로 -" 한국거버넌스학회 16 (16): 253-280, 2009

3 고종협, "제주 해군기지 정책변동과정에 대한 동태적 분석: 책옹호연합모형(ACF)의 적용을 통한 연구" 서울행정학회 20 (20): 139-178, 2009

4 최은영, "정책옹호연합모형에서 정책중개자(Policy Broker)의 역할에 관한 비판적 검토" 97-120, 2008

5 강은숙, "정책변동의 정책네트워크이론적 분석-그린벨트정책을 중심으로" 13 (13): 103-125, 2002

6 김순양, "정책과정분석과 옹호연합모형-이론적･실천적 적실성 검토" 한국정책학회 19 (19): 35-70, 2010

7 전영평, "일본군위안부소수자 정책변동 과정 분석 -소수자관점과 옹호연합모형(ACF)의 적용-" 한국정부학회 20 (20): 767-794, 2008

8 전진석, "의약분업 정책변화에 대한 연구: 정책옹호연합 모형을 적용하여" 한국정책학회 12 (12): 59-88, 2003

9 양승일, "옹호연합모형(ACF)을 활용한 정책변동 분석-그린벨트정책을 중심으로" 한국도시지리학회 8 (8): 41-52, 2005

10 조만형, "옹호연합 틀(ACF)을 활용한 교육정책이해관계자간 정책갈등에 관한 실증적 연구" 사회과학연구소 21 (21): 121-152, 2010

11 3려통합사, "여수시편찬위원회"

12 유경화, "시 군통합추진과정의 정치적 갈등에 관한 연구-여수반도와 무안반도를 중심으로" 전남대학교 1999

13 전진석, "새만금 간척사업의 정치경제와 정책옹호연합모형" 14 (14): 207-234, 2003

14 김웅진, "비교사회연구방법론" 한울아카데미 2000

15 김순양, "보건의료 정책형성 과정의 동태성:옹호연합모형(ACF)을 통한 의료보험 통합일원화 논쟁의 해석" 한국정책학회 15 (15): 1-34, 2006

16 김영종, "고용정책형성과정의 동태성 분석: 외국인 고용허가제의 정책네트워크와 정책옹호연합모형을 중심으로" 한국정책과학학회 13 (13): 119-144, 2009

17 장지호, "경유승용차 판매허용의 정책변동연구: 옹호연합모형(Advocacy Coalition Framework)의 적용" 한국행정학회 38 (38): 175-196, 2004

18 Charles Brecher., "understanding the Political Context of New Policy Issues: The Use of the Advocacy Coalition Framework in the Case of Expanded After-School Programs" 30 : 1-21, 2009

19 Sabatier, Paul A., "Theories of the policy process" Westview Press 117-168, 1999

20 Weible, Christopher M., "Themes and Variations: taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework" 37 (37): 121-140, 2009

21 Sabatier, Paul A., "The devil shift: Perceptions and misperceptions of opponents" 41 : 449-476, 1987

22 Pfeffer, "The External Control of Organization" Harper 1979

23 Howlett, Michael, "Studying public policy : policy cycles and policy subsystems" Oxford University Press 1995

24 Zafonte, Matthew, "Short-term versus long-term coalitions in the policy process: Automotive pollution control" 32 (32): 75-108, 2004

25 Zafonte, Matthew, "Shared beliefs and imposed interdependencies as determinants of ally networks in overlapping subsystems" 10 (10): 473-505, 1998

26 Meltsner, Arnold J, "Political feasibility and policy analysis" 32 : 859-867, 1972

27 Adrian Smith., "Policy networks and advocacy coalitions: explaining policy change and stability in UK industrial pollution policy?" 18 : 95-114, 2000

28 Weber, Edward P, "Pluralism by the rules" Georgetown University Press 1998

29 Marie Hojnacki., "Organized Interests' Advocacy Behavior in Alliances" 51 (51): 437-459, 1998

30 Sabatier, Paul, "Knowledge, policy-oriented learning, and policy change" 8 : 649-692, 1987

31 Menno Fenger, "Interdependency, beliefs, and coalition behavior: A contribution to the advocacy coalition framework" 34 (34): 157-170, 2001

32 Sabatier, Paul A., "Innovations in the advocacy coalition framework" 2005

33 Sabatier, Paul A., "Incorporating multiple actors and guidance instruments into models of regulatory policymaking: An advocacy coalition framework" 19 (19): 236-263, 1987

34 박상원, "IPTV 정책형성 과정의 역동성에 관한 분석-옹호연합(Advocacy Coalition)의 신념체계(belief system) 변화과정을 중심으로" 511-536, 2009

35 Weible, Christopher M., "Comparing policy networks: Marine protected areas in California" 33 (33): 181-204, 2005

36 Sabatier, Paul, "An advocacy coalition model of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein" 21 : 129-168, 1988

37 Weible, C. M, "An advocacy coalition framework approach to stakeholder analysis: Understanding the political context of California marine protected area policy" 17 : 95-117, 2006

38 Kingdon, John, "Agendas, ideas, and policy change. 2d ed" HarperCollins 1994

39 Baumgartner, Frank R., "Agendas and instability in American politics" University of Chicago Press 1993

40 Mintrom, Michael, "Advocacy coalitions, policy entrepreneurs, and policy change" 24 : 420-434, 1996

41 여천환경운동본부, "3여통합관련 내부자료"

42 한창진, "3려통합의 성과와 행정구역 통합방안" 2009

43 이건철, "2000년대 통일한국시대를 주도할 여수반도권의 발전전략" 전남발전연구원 1997