RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    OECD/DAC의 증여등가제(Grant Equivalent System) 도입이후 공적개발원조(ODA)의 변화와 향후 과제 = Changes in Official Development Assistance since the OECD/DAC's Grant Equivalent System and Future Challenges

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109440991

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Despite the introduction of the OECD/DAC's grant equivalent system, which aims to increase concessionality and target ODA to the poorest countries, the actual distribution of ODA shows that these goals have not been fully realized. A significant portion of ODA is still concentrated in middle-income countries (MICs), with only a small fraction reaching low-income countries (LDCs and LICs). There has also been little change in the overall volume of ODA or in donors' lending practices under the new system. While the grant equivalent system represents an important step forward in the way ODA is measured and reported, its impact remains limited mainly due to donor-centered priorities and a lack of concessions to the poorest countries. This paper traces the causes to donor prioritization and risk aversion, inadequate lending conditions, structural problems with the new methodology, and an outdated DAC recommendation framework. Future challenges to address these issues and improve the effectiveness of the grant equivalent methodology include strengthening incentives to lend to the poorest countries, improving the terms and conditions of lending to low-income countries, increasing the proportion of grant aid to low-income countries, enhancing transparency and monitoring of donor aid, and revising DAC recommendation on terms and conditions of ODA. If implemented, these measures would enable donors to better align their practices with the objectives of the grant equivalent system and ensure that ODA effectively supports the poorest and lowest-income countries.
    번역하기

    Despite the introduction of the OECD/DAC's grant equivalent system, which aims to increase concessionality and target ODA to the poorest countries, the actual distribution of ODA shows that these goals have not been fully realized. A significant porti...

    Despite the introduction of the OECD/DAC's grant equivalent system, which aims to increase concessionality and target ODA to the poorest countries, the actual distribution of ODA shows that these goals have not been fully realized. A significant portion of ODA is still concentrated in middle-income countries (MICs), with only a small fraction reaching low-income countries (LDCs and LICs). There has also been little change in the overall volume of ODA or in donors' lending practices under the new system. While the grant equivalent system represents an important step forward in the way ODA is measured and reported, its impact remains limited mainly due to donor-centered priorities and a lack of concessions to the poorest countries. This paper traces the causes to donor prioritization and risk aversion, inadequate lending conditions, structural problems with the new methodology, and an outdated DAC recommendation framework. Future challenges to address these issues and improve the effectiveness of the grant equivalent methodology include strengthening incentives to lend to the poorest countries, improving the terms and conditions of lending to low-income countries, increasing the proportion of grant aid to low-income countries, enhancing transparency and monitoring of donor aid, and revising DAC recommendation on terms and conditions of ODA. If implemented, these measures would enable donors to better align their practices with the objectives of the grant equivalent system and ensure that ODA effectively supports the poorest and lowest-income countries.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼