RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Clinical and biochemical outcomes of men undergoing radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100899767

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: We analyzed outcomes of patients with prostate cancer undergoing either radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) +/– salvage radiation or definitive radiation therapy (RT) +/– androgen deprivation. Materials and Methods: From 2003–2010 there were 251 patients who underwent RRP and 469 patients who received RT (≥7,560 cGy) for prostate cancer. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed with the log-rank test to compare biochemical control (bCR), distant metastatic-free survival (DMPFS), and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) between the two groups. Results: The median follow-up was 70 months and 61.3% of the men were African American. For low risk disease the 6-year bCR were 90.3% for RT and 85.6% for RRP (p = 0.23) and the 6-year post-salvage bCR were 90.3% vs. 90.9%, respectively (p = 0.84). For intermediate risk disease the 6-year bCR were 82.6% for RT and 59.7% for RRP (p < 0.001) and 82.6% vs. 74.0%, respectively, after including those salvaged with RT (p = 0.06). For high risk disease, the 6-year bCR were 67.4% for RT and 41.3% for RRP (p < 0.001) and after including those salvaged with RT was 67.4% vs. 43.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in regards to DMPFS or PCSS. Conclusion: Treatment approaches utilizing RRP +/– salvage radiation or RT +/– androgen deprivation yielded equivalent DMPFS and PCSS outcomes. Biochemical control rates, using their respective definitions, appeared equivalent or better in those who received treatment with RT.
      번역하기

      Purpose: We analyzed outcomes of patients with prostate cancer undergoing either radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) +/– salvage radiation or definitive radiation therapy (RT) +/– androgen deprivation. Materials and Methods: From 2003–2010 th...

      Purpose: We analyzed outcomes of patients with prostate cancer undergoing either radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) +/– salvage radiation or definitive radiation therapy (RT) +/– androgen deprivation. Materials and Methods: From 2003–2010 there were 251 patients who underwent RRP and 469 patients who received RT (≥7,560 cGy) for prostate cancer. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed with the log-rank test to compare biochemical control (bCR), distant metastatic-free survival (DMPFS), and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) between the two groups. Results: The median follow-up was 70 months and 61.3% of the men were African American. For low risk disease the 6-year bCR were 90.3% for RT and 85.6% for RRP (p = 0.23) and the 6-year post-salvage bCR were 90.3% vs. 90.9%, respectively (p = 0.84). For intermediate risk disease the 6-year bCR were 82.6% for RT and 59.7% for RRP (p < 0.001) and 82.6% vs. 74.0%, respectively, after including those salvaged with RT (p = 0.06). For high risk disease, the 6-year bCR were 67.4% for RT and 41.3% for RRP (p < 0.001) and after including those salvaged with RT was 67.4% vs. 43.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in regards to DMPFS or PCSS. Conclusion: Treatment approaches utilizing RRP +/– salvage radiation or RT +/– androgen deprivation yielded equivalent DMPFS and PCSS outcomes. Biochemical control rates, using their respective definitions, appeared equivalent or better in those who received treatment with RT.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. Introduction
      • 2. Materials and Methods
      • 3. Results
      • 4. Discussion and Conclusion
      • 5. Conflict of Interest
      • 1. Introduction
      • 2. Materials and Methods
      • 3. Results
      • 4. Discussion and Conclusion
      • 5. Conflict of Interest
      • 6. References
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Cookson MS, "Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes" 177 : 540-545, 2007

      2 Kupelian PA, "Radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy < 72 Gy, external beam radiotherapy > or = 72 Gy, permanent seed implantation, or combined seeds/external beam radiotherapy for stage T1-T2prostate cancer" 58 : 25-33, 2004

      3 Aizer AA, "Radical prostatectomy vs. intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the management of localized prostate adenocarcinoma" 93 : 185-191, 2009

      4 Rayala HJ, "Radical prostatectomy reigns supreme" 23 : 863-867, 2009

      5 Surapaneni A, "Radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: long-term results of 469 patients from a single institution in the era of dose escalation" 10 : 951-956, 2014

      6 Du XL, "Racial disparity and socioeconomic status in association with survival in older men with local/regional stage prostate carcinoma: findings from a large community-based cohort" 106 : 1276-1285, 2006

      7 Tewari A, "Racial differences in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time, histopathological variables and long-term PSA recurrence between African-American and white American men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer" 96 : 29-33, 2005

      8 Klein EA, "Outcomes for intermediate risk prostate cancer: are there advantages for surgery, external radiation, or brachytherapy?" 27 : 67-71, 2009

      9 "National Comprehensive Cancer Network; c2015" National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines on prostate cancer

      10 Potters L, "Monotherapy for stage T1-T2 prostate cancer: radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, or permanent seed implantation" 71 : 29-33, 2004

      1 Cookson MS, "Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes" 177 : 540-545, 2007

      2 Kupelian PA, "Radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy < 72 Gy, external beam radiotherapy > or = 72 Gy, permanent seed implantation, or combined seeds/external beam radiotherapy for stage T1-T2prostate cancer" 58 : 25-33, 2004

      3 Aizer AA, "Radical prostatectomy vs. intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the management of localized prostate adenocarcinoma" 93 : 185-191, 2009

      4 Rayala HJ, "Radical prostatectomy reigns supreme" 23 : 863-867, 2009

      5 Surapaneni A, "Radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: long-term results of 469 patients from a single institution in the era of dose escalation" 10 : 951-956, 2014

      6 Du XL, "Racial disparity and socioeconomic status in association with survival in older men with local/regional stage prostate carcinoma: findings from a large community-based cohort" 106 : 1276-1285, 2006

      7 Tewari A, "Racial differences in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time, histopathological variables and long-term PSA recurrence between African-American and white American men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer" 96 : 29-33, 2005

      8 Klein EA, "Outcomes for intermediate risk prostate cancer: are there advantages for surgery, external radiation, or brachytherapy?" 27 : 67-71, 2009

      9 "National Comprehensive Cancer Network; c2015" National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines on prostate cancer

      10 Potters L, "Monotherapy for stage T1-T2 prostate cancer: radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, or permanent seed implantation" 71 : 29-33, 2004

      11 Joseph J. Safdieh, "Long-term tolerance and outcomes for dose escalation in early salvage post-prostatectomy radiation therapy" 대한방사선종양학회 32 (32): 179-186, 2014

      12 Cross CK, "Impact of race on prostate-specific antigen outcome after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate" 20 : 2863-2868, 2002

      13 Du KL, "Impact of marital status and race on outcomes of patients enrolled in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group prostate cancer trials" 20 : 1317-1325, 2012

      14 Vassil AD, "Five year biochemical recurrence free survival for intermediate risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy or permanent seed implantation" 76 : 1251-1257, 2010

      15 Chu DI, "Effect of race and socioeconomic status on surgical margins and biochemical outcomes in an equal-access health care setting: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH)database" 118 : 4999-5007, 2012

      16 Chornokur G, "Disparities at presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and survival in African American men, affected by prostate cancer" 71 : 985-997, 2011

      17 Shah C, "Differences in disease presentation, treatment outcomes, and toxicities in African American patients treated with radiation therapy for prostate cancer" 35 : 566-571, 2012

      18 Roach M 3rd, "Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer:recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference" 65 : 965-974, 2006

      19 Nielsen ME, "Black race does not independently predict adverse outcome following radical retropubic prostatectomy at a tertiary referral center" 176 : 515-519, 2006

      20 D'Amico AV, "Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer" 280 : 969-974, 1998

      21 Sundi D, "African American men with very low-risk prostate cancer exhibit adverse oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy: should active surveillance still be an option for them?" 31 : 2991-2997, 2013

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2020-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 SCOPUS 등재 (기타) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2012-04-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-12-30 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Society For Therapeutic Radiology And Oncology -> The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology KCI등재
      2011-08-22 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한방사선종양학회지 -> Radiation oncology journal
      외국어명 : The Journal of the Korean Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology -> Radiation oncology journal
      KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.31 0.31 0.25
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.23 0.22 0.864 0.05
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼