RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      Hitachi LABOSPECT 008에서의 Wako 및 Sekisui 임상화학시약의 분석성능 = Analytical Performance of Wako and Sekisui Clinical Chemistry Assays on Hitachi LABOSPECT 008

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101598661

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: We evaluated the analytical performance of Wako assays for albumin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), complement C3 and C4, calcium, creatine kinase (CK), C-reactive protein (CRP), direct bilirubin (DBIL), iron, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), HDL cholesterol (HDLC), inorganic phosphorus (IP), LDL cholesterol (LDLC), total bilirubin (TBIL), total protein (TP),and uric acid (UA), as well as the performance of Sekisui assays for albumin, BUN, calcium, CRP, HDLC, IP, LDLC, TP, and UA by using Hitachi LABOSPECT 008 (Hitachi High-Tech Co., Japan).
      Methods: Liquid Assayed Multiqual Control (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA) and pooled patients’ sera were analyzed for 20 days. Wako linearity material (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Japan) and Sysmex Interference Check A Plus kit (Sysmex Co., Japan) were used to test linearity and interference,respectively. Concentrations of the target analytes were measured using Hitachi LABOSPECT 008 in 100 residual patient specimens and compared to those in Pureauto S series reagent (Sekisui Medical, Japan), which were measured using Hitachi 7600 (Hitachi High-Tech Co., Japan).
      Results: Total coefficients of variation (CVs) for the tested analytes were 0.91-9.26% in Wako and 1.04-7.46% in Sekisui assays. Linearity was demonstrated up to the highest concentration within the analytical range in all the assays except for Wako albumin and Sekisui TP. Wako and Sekisui albumin, BUN, CRP, HDLC, and LDLC assays, and in Wako C3, C4, calcium, and UA assays showed no interference with the test concentrations used.
      All the tested assays, except for Wako AST, LDLC, and TP, and Sekisui calcium and TP, demonstrated comparability with comparative method for at least one medical decision level.
      Conclusions: Our study results showed that the analytical performances of Wako and Sekisui chemistry assays evaluated using Hitachi LABOSPECT 008 had appropriate analytical performance for clinical use
      번역하기

      Background: We evaluated the analytical performance of Wako assays for albumin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), complement C3 and C4, calcium, creatine kinase (CK), C-reactive protein (CRP),...

      Background: We evaluated the analytical performance of Wako assays for albumin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), complement C3 and C4, calcium, creatine kinase (CK), C-reactive protein (CRP), direct bilirubin (DBIL), iron, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), HDL cholesterol (HDLC), inorganic phosphorus (IP), LDL cholesterol (LDLC), total bilirubin (TBIL), total protein (TP),and uric acid (UA), as well as the performance of Sekisui assays for albumin, BUN, calcium, CRP, HDLC, IP, LDLC, TP, and UA by using Hitachi LABOSPECT 008 (Hitachi High-Tech Co., Japan).
      Methods: Liquid Assayed Multiqual Control (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA) and pooled patients’ sera were analyzed for 20 days. Wako linearity material (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Japan) and Sysmex Interference Check A Plus kit (Sysmex Co., Japan) were used to test linearity and interference,respectively. Concentrations of the target analytes were measured using Hitachi LABOSPECT 008 in 100 residual patient specimens and compared to those in Pureauto S series reagent (Sekisui Medical, Japan), which were measured using Hitachi 7600 (Hitachi High-Tech Co., Japan).
      Results: Total coefficients of variation (CVs) for the tested analytes were 0.91-9.26% in Wako and 1.04-7.46% in Sekisui assays. Linearity was demonstrated up to the highest concentration within the analytical range in all the assays except for Wako albumin and Sekisui TP. Wako and Sekisui albumin, BUN, CRP, HDLC, and LDLC assays, and in Wako C3, C4, calcium, and UA assays showed no interference with the test concentrations used.
      All the tested assays, except for Wako AST, LDLC, and TP, and Sekisui calcium and TP, demonstrated comparability with comparative method for at least one medical decision level.
      Conclusions: Our study results showed that the analytical performances of Wako and Sekisui chemistry assays evaluated using Hitachi LABOSPECT 008 had appropriate analytical performance for clinical use

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 강소영, "측정 범위가 넓은 C-Reactive Protein 검사법 비교" 대한진단검사의학회 25 (25): 227-233, 2005

      2 Burtis CA, "Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry and molecular diagnostics" Elsevier Saunders 2131-2188, 2011

      3 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, "Procedures for the handling and processing of blood specimens for common laboratory tests; approved guideline-Fourth edition, H18-A4"

      4 Steen G, "Multicenter evaluation of the interference of hemoglobin, bilirubin and lipids on Synchron LX-20 assays" 44 : 413-419, 2006

      5 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, "Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples; approved guideline-Second edition, EP09-A2"

      6 Westgard J., "Medical decision levels"

      7 Jacques W, "Interpretation of diagnostic tests" Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 8-30, 2007

      8 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, "Interference testing in clinical chemistry, EP07-A2"

      9 "Hitachi Clinical Chemistry Analytical Instrument LABOSPECT 008"

      10 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, "Evaluation of the linearity of quantitative measurement procedures : a statistical approach; approved guideline, EP06-A"

      1 강소영, "측정 범위가 넓은 C-Reactive Protein 검사법 비교" 대한진단검사의학회 25 (25): 227-233, 2005

      2 Burtis CA, "Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry and molecular diagnostics" Elsevier Saunders 2131-2188, 2011

      3 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, "Procedures for the handling and processing of blood specimens for common laboratory tests; approved guideline-Fourth edition, H18-A4"

      4 Steen G, "Multicenter evaluation of the interference of hemoglobin, bilirubin and lipids on Synchron LX-20 assays" 44 : 413-419, 2006

      5 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, "Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples; approved guideline-Second edition, EP09-A2"

      6 Westgard J., "Medical decision levels"

      7 Jacques W, "Interpretation of diagnostic tests" Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 8-30, 2007

      8 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, "Interference testing in clinical chemistry, EP07-A2"

      9 "Hitachi Clinical Chemistry Analytical Instrument LABOSPECT 008"

      10 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, "Evaluation of the linearity of quantitative measurement procedures : a statistical approach; approved guideline, EP06-A"

      11 Ji JZ, "Evaluation of the interference of hemoglobin, bilirubin, and lipids on Roche Cobas 6000 assays" 412 : 1550-1553, 2011

      12 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, "Evaluation of precision performance of quantitative measurement methods; approved guideline- second edition, EP05-A2"

      13 Zivkovic AM, "Effects of sample handling and storage on quantitative lipid analysis in human serum" 5 : 507-516, 2009

      14 Westgard J., "Desirable biological variation database specifications"

      15 Sisman AR, "Comparison and evaluation of two C-reactive protein assays based on particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetry" 21 : 71-76, 2007

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 학술지 분리 (기타) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.16 0.16 0.11
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.09 0.09 0.306 0.05
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼