RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Incidence and Risk Factors of the Caudal Screw Loosening after Pelvic Fixation for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108968010

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study was to assess the factors affecting caudal screw loosening after spinopelvic fixation for adult patients with spinal deformity. This meta-analysis calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) using Review Manager ver. 5.3 (RevMan; Cochrane, London, UK). The loosening group was older than the control group (WMD, 2.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48–3.87; <i>p</i>=0.01). The S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) could prevent the caudal screw from loosening (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20–0.94; <i>p</i>=0.03). However, gender distribution (<i>p</i>=0.36), the number of fusion segments (<i>p</i>=0.24), rod breakage (<i>p</i>=0.97), T-score (<i>p</i>=0.10), and proximal junctional kyphosis (<i>p</i>=0.75) demonstrated no difference. Preoperatively, only pelvic incidence (PI) in the loosening group was higher (WMD, 5.08; 95% CI, 2.71–7.45; <i>p</i><0.01), while thoracic kyphosis (<i>p</i>=0.09), lumbar lordosis (LL) (<i>p</i>=0.69), pelvic tilt (PT) (<i>p</i>=0.31), pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI–LL) (<i>p</i>=0.35), sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (<i>p</i>=0.27), and T1 pelvic angle (TPA) demonstrated no difference (<i>p</i>=0.10). PI–LL (WMD, 6.05; 95% CI, 0.96–11.14; <i>p</i>=0.02), PT (WMD, 4.12; 95% CI, 0.99–7.26; <i>p</i>=0.01), TPA (WMD, 4.72; 95% CI, 2.35–7.09; <i>p</i><0.01), and SVA (WMD, 13.35; 95% CI, 2.83–3.87; <i>p</i>=0.001) were higher in the screw loosening group immediately postoperatively. However, TK (<i>p</i>=0.24) and LL (<i>p</i>=0.44) demonstrated no difference. TPA (WMD, 8.38; 95% CI, 3.30–13.47; <i>p</i><0.01), PT (WMD, 6.01; 95% CI, 1.47–10.55; <i>p</i>=0.01), and SVA (WMD, 23.13; 95% CI, 12.06–34.21; <i>p</i><0.01) were higher in the screw loosening group at the final follow-up. However, PI–LL (<i>p</i>=0.17) demonstrated no significant difference. Elderly individuals were more susceptible to the caudal screw loosening, and the S2AI screw might better reduce the caudal screw loosening rate than the iliac screws. The lumbar lordosis and sagittal alignment should be reconstructed properly to prevent the caudal screw from loosening. Measures to block sagittal alignment deterioration could also prevent the caudal screw from loosening.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study was to assess the factors affecting caudal screw loosening after spinopelvic fixation for adult patients with spinal deformity. This meta-analysis calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) using Review...

      The purpose of this study was to assess the factors affecting caudal screw loosening after spinopelvic fixation for adult patients with spinal deformity. This meta-analysis calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) using Review Manager ver. 5.3 (RevMan; Cochrane, London, UK). The loosening group was older than the control group (WMD, 2.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48–3.87; <i>p</i>=0.01). The S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) could prevent the caudal screw from loosening (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20–0.94; <i>p</i>=0.03). However, gender distribution (<i>p</i>=0.36), the number of fusion segments (<i>p</i>=0.24), rod breakage (<i>p</i>=0.97), T-score (<i>p</i>=0.10), and proximal junctional kyphosis (<i>p</i>=0.75) demonstrated no difference. Preoperatively, only pelvic incidence (PI) in the loosening group was higher (WMD, 5.08; 95% CI, 2.71–7.45; <i>p</i><0.01), while thoracic kyphosis (<i>p</i>=0.09), lumbar lordosis (LL) (<i>p</i>=0.69), pelvic tilt (PT) (<i>p</i>=0.31), pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI–LL) (<i>p</i>=0.35), sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (<i>p</i>=0.27), and T1 pelvic angle (TPA) demonstrated no difference (<i>p</i>=0.10). PI–LL (WMD, 6.05; 95% CI, 0.96–11.14; <i>p</i>=0.02), PT (WMD, 4.12; 95% CI, 0.99–7.26; <i>p</i>=0.01), TPA (WMD, 4.72; 95% CI, 2.35–7.09; <i>p</i><0.01), and SVA (WMD, 13.35; 95% CI, 2.83–3.87; <i>p</i>=0.001) were higher in the screw loosening group immediately postoperatively. However, TK (<i>p</i>=0.24) and LL (<i>p</i>=0.44) demonstrated no difference. TPA (WMD, 8.38; 95% CI, 3.30–13.47; <i>p</i><0.01), PT (WMD, 6.01; 95% CI, 1.47–10.55; <i>p</i>=0.01), and SVA (WMD, 23.13; 95% CI, 12.06–34.21; <i>p</i><0.01) were higher in the screw loosening group at the final follow-up. However, PI–LL (<i>p</i>=0.17) demonstrated no significant difference. Elderly individuals were more susceptible to the caudal screw loosening, and the S2AI screw might better reduce the caudal screw loosening rate than the iliac screws. The lumbar lordosis and sagittal alignment should be reconstructed properly to prevent the caudal screw from loosening. Measures to block sagittal alignment deterioration could also prevent the caudal screw from loosening.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼