RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    농지의 보전 및 전용 법제 개선 = Legal Study on the Preservation and Diversion of Farmland

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99923538

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The legal system of farmland preservation and diversion in Korea has unique characteristics in terms of its history and law-making behavior. Under land-to-the tiller principle of the Korean Constitution of 1948 and the Farmland Reform Act in 1950, helped to create a large population of independent farmers, while preserving the farmland and prohibiting the diversion in order to extend the performance of farmland reform Since 1960 industrialization and urbanization made much more demand to change from farmland to factory and housing lost, causing dilemma between high growth of economy and severe food security problem. In order to solve this dilemma, there was several legislative efforts, for example, Act on the Utilization and Management of the National Territory in 1972 as primary law and Act on the Preservation and Utilization of Farmland in 1972 as its special law. The one has been transformed into the Farmland Act in 1994, while the other into the Act on the Land Planning and Utilization of the National Territory in 2002. Speaking of the farmland, under the Act on the Special Measures for Development of Agricultural and Fishing Villages in 1990 could make the preservation method of category from the individual lot of land to zoning area(so called ‘agricultural development region’), taking after the Japanese legal system. This study suggests that preservation of farmland should mean the reasonable regulation of the diversion of farmland. Farmland is surely related to market failure and has multi-functionality and public economic effect as common goods. In order to ensure the effectiveness of the farmland conservation policy, new realization as well as the systematic development is required. There are three ways to improve the system to ensure the effective farmland conservation, utilization and management. First, minimum farmland for food self-sufficiency should be secured. Securing total amount of farmland means securing the minimum farmland to maintain the certain level of food self-sufficiency. Expanding designation of the agriculture promotion area, strengthening of the farmland conversion restriction system and selective approval of the farmland conversion should be implemented. Second, in order to promote agriculture and reduce the fallow ground rate, quality of the land`s arability should be improved with temporary reorganization of the farmland, establishment of agricultural roads and development of the profitable crops and the ideal crops that suit the local characteristics. Finally, in order to utilize and maintain the unique nature of the farmland in long term, tight supervision over illegal activities, accurate investigation of actual farmland usage and strengthening of the disposition order system should be implemented. At the same time, in order to raise the transparency of the system, the management system should be regulated by law and the whole process should be systemized to establish the effective management system. This study seeks also to clear conceptual ambiguities around the concept of the farmland in field of Farmland Act. Specifically, farmland is defined as land used for cultivation without the consideration of nominal land category. In reality it is impossible for the authorities to review the transaction document substantially under the current Farmland Act. Though its ambiguity had resulted from arbitrary decision during the farmland reform in 1950 and afterward political consideration of the farmer`s complaint, it has introduced so many problems in auction process. Only under the substantial review system it is possible for the authorities to review the requirement of farmers. Alternative solution is the reform of farmland act from present condition test to land category test regarding mismatching problem between present condition and land category. In conclusion, this issue should be considered in the reforming process of the farmland transaction system: congruence for land use and nominal land category, adoption of farming permit system, registration of farmers, establishment of farmland management organization, and improvement of the procedure for substantial farmland transaction review.
    번역하기

    The legal system of farmland preservation and diversion in Korea has unique characteristics in terms of its history and law-making behavior. Under land-to-the tiller principle of the Korean Constitution of 1948 and the Farmland Reform Act in 1950, hel...

    The legal system of farmland preservation and diversion in Korea has unique characteristics in terms of its history and law-making behavior. Under land-to-the tiller principle of the Korean Constitution of 1948 and the Farmland Reform Act in 1950, helped to create a large population of independent farmers, while preserving the farmland and prohibiting the diversion in order to extend the performance of farmland reform Since 1960 industrialization and urbanization made much more demand to change from farmland to factory and housing lost, causing dilemma between high growth of economy and severe food security problem. In order to solve this dilemma, there was several legislative efforts, for example, Act on the Utilization and Management of the National Territory in 1972 as primary law and Act on the Preservation and Utilization of Farmland in 1972 as its special law. The one has been transformed into the Farmland Act in 1994, while the other into the Act on the Land Planning and Utilization of the National Territory in 2002. Speaking of the farmland, under the Act on the Special Measures for Development of Agricultural and Fishing Villages in 1990 could make the preservation method of category from the individual lot of land to zoning area(so called ‘agricultural development region’), taking after the Japanese legal system. This study suggests that preservation of farmland should mean the reasonable regulation of the diversion of farmland. Farmland is surely related to market failure and has multi-functionality and public economic effect as common goods. In order to ensure the effectiveness of the farmland conservation policy, new realization as well as the systematic development is required. There are three ways to improve the system to ensure the effective farmland conservation, utilization and management. First, minimum farmland for food self-sufficiency should be secured. Securing total amount of farmland means securing the minimum farmland to maintain the certain level of food self-sufficiency. Expanding designation of the agriculture promotion area, strengthening of the farmland conversion restriction system and selective approval of the farmland conversion should be implemented. Second, in order to promote agriculture and reduce the fallow ground rate, quality of the land`s arability should be improved with temporary reorganization of the farmland, establishment of agricultural roads and development of the profitable crops and the ideal crops that suit the local characteristics. Finally, in order to utilize and maintain the unique nature of the farmland in long term, tight supervision over illegal activities, accurate investigation of actual farmland usage and strengthening of the disposition order system should be implemented. At the same time, in order to raise the transparency of the system, the management system should be regulated by law and the whole process should be systemized to establish the effective management system. This study seeks also to clear conceptual ambiguities around the concept of the farmland in field of Farmland Act. Specifically, farmland is defined as land used for cultivation without the consideration of nominal land category. In reality it is impossible for the authorities to review the transaction document substantially under the current Farmland Act. Though its ambiguity had resulted from arbitrary decision during the farmland reform in 1950 and afterward political consideration of the farmer`s complaint, it has introduced so many problems in auction process. Only under the substantial review system it is possible for the authorities to review the requirement of farmers. Alternative solution is the reform of farmland act from present condition test to land category test regarding mismatching problem between present condition and land category. In conclusion, this issue should be considered in the reforming process of the farmland transaction system: congruence for land use and nominal land category, adoption of farming permit system, registration of farmers, establishment of farmland management organization, and improvement of the procedure for substantial farmland transaction review.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼