RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    상징천황제와 한국언론: <동아일보>의 쇼와천황 보도를 중심으로 = The Symbolic Emperor System of Japan in the Korean Press: focusing on the reports of DongaIlbo on Showa Emperor

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99955913

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This thesis is intended to examine the approach of Donga Ilbo to the Japanese emperor and the symbolic emperor system of Japan in a critical manner. The reports of the media on the remarks of Showa emperor on the past issues and his responsibility for them during the world war II are analyzed to find any coherence in them. The varying titles of Japanese emperor in the newspaper are also examined to reflect the meaning of objectivity in the press. It is revealed that the Korean press did not show consistent and critical approach toward the symbolic emperor system of Japan as well as the title of the emperor. Although its critical approach toward them appeared momentarily in the form of depreciative titles of the japanese emperor in the medium after the liberation of Korea, it did not last long due to political turmoil and the Korean War. The medium pointed out the emperor`s responsibility for the war for the first time in the 1980s, but it was not a consistent response either. It belittled the emperor`s responsibility for japan`s colonial rule in Korea and war crime by interpreting his indirect remarks of the past issues as an official apology toward Korea and its people. As the Japanese government turn rightest, several points are to be made for Korean media. Firstly, they should not let the japanese emperor get away with his war crime issues and his role in the colonial rule in Korea by any political considerations. Secondly, they should avoid emotional responses and persue consistency based on the principle of objectivity. In particular, it is not proper to use the title ‘King of Japan’ to avoid serious misunderstanding because Japan is not a typical constitutional monarchy. Lastly, the approach should be focused on the Japanese emperor system itself rather than an individual.
    번역하기

    This thesis is intended to examine the approach of Donga Ilbo to the Japanese emperor and the symbolic emperor system of Japan in a critical manner. The reports of the media on the remarks of Showa emperor on the past issues and his responsibility for...

    This thesis is intended to examine the approach of Donga Ilbo to the Japanese emperor and the symbolic emperor system of Japan in a critical manner. The reports of the media on the remarks of Showa emperor on the past issues and his responsibility for them during the world war II are analyzed to find any coherence in them. The varying titles of Japanese emperor in the newspaper are also examined to reflect the meaning of objectivity in the press. It is revealed that the Korean press did not show consistent and critical approach toward the symbolic emperor system of Japan as well as the title of the emperor. Although its critical approach toward them appeared momentarily in the form of depreciative titles of the japanese emperor in the medium after the liberation of Korea, it did not last long due to political turmoil and the Korean War. The medium pointed out the emperor`s responsibility for the war for the first time in the 1980s, but it was not a consistent response either. It belittled the emperor`s responsibility for japan`s colonial rule in Korea and war crime by interpreting his indirect remarks of the past issues as an official apology toward Korea and its people. As the Japanese government turn rightest, several points are to be made for Korean media. Firstly, they should not let the japanese emperor get away with his war crime issues and his role in the colonial rule in Korea by any political considerations. Secondly, they should avoid emotional responses and persue consistency based on the principle of objectivity. In particular, it is not proper to use the title ‘King of Japan’ to avoid serious misunderstanding because Japan is not a typical constitutional monarchy. Lastly, the approach should be focused on the Japanese emperor system itself rather than an individual.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 河西秀哉, "「象徴天皇」の戦後史" 講談社選書 2010

    2 오현숙, "히로히토 평전, 근대 일본의 형성" 삼인 2010

    3 정창석, "현대 천황제의 리저널리즘" 국제학연구소 13 (13): 73-97, 2004

    4 정창석, "현대 천황제 사상" 한국일본문화학회 (31) : 451-486, 2006

    5 한승동, "한일밀사 세지마 류조 자서전 <기산하>로 본 역사왜곡의 뿌리" (3) : 2001

    6 김창록, "한국에서 바라본 천황제" (50) : 2000

    7 조용래, "천황제코드" 논형 2009

    8 Field,Norma, "죽어가는 천황의 나라에서" 창작과 비평사 2002

    9 김준섭, "전후 일본인의 역사인식에 관한 고찰" 34 (34): 2001

    10 정려정, "일본의 양태 ; 일본 정치인들의 ‘망언’ 일지" 25 : 2006

    1 河西秀哉, "「象徴天皇」の戦後史" 講談社選書 2010

    2 오현숙, "히로히토 평전, 근대 일본의 형성" 삼인 2010

    3 정창석, "현대 천황제의 리저널리즘" 국제학연구소 13 (13): 73-97, 2004

    4 정창석, "현대 천황제 사상" 한국일본문화학회 (31) : 451-486, 2006

    5 한승동, "한일밀사 세지마 류조 자서전 <기산하>로 본 역사왜곡의 뿌리" (3) : 2001

    6 김창록, "한국에서 바라본 천황제" (50) : 2000

    7 조용래, "천황제코드" 논형 2009

    8 Field,Norma, "죽어가는 천황의 나라에서" 창작과 비평사 2002

    9 김준섭, "전후 일본인의 역사인식에 관한 고찰" 34 (34): 2001

    10 정려정, "일본의 양태 ; 일본 정치인들의 ‘망언’ 일지" 25 : 2006

    11 남상구, "일본의 '전후처리'와 식민지 문제" 한일관계사학회 (36) : 291-315, 2010

    12 강재언, "일본수상의 망언을 비판한다" 76 (76): 1995

    13 손승철, "일본 역사교과서 왜곡의 사적전개와 대응" 한일관계사학회 (40) : 3-38, 2011

    14 박진우, "상징천황제와 미국" (창간) : 2009

    15 이노우에 타쯔오, "민주적 천황제를 넘어서: 자유주의의 관점에서" 13 (13): 1996

    16 坂本孝治郎, "象徴天皇制へのパフォーマンス" 山川出版社 1989

    17 渡辺治, "日本の大国化とネオ・ナショナリズムの形成" 桜井書店 2001

    18 Kenneth J.Ruoff, "国民の天皇" 岩波現代文庫 2009

    19 박진우, "21세기 천황제와 일본 : 일본 지식인과의 대담" 논형 2006

    20 이기완, "1945년 이후 일본의 對韓인식과 對韓정책: 지속의 동학" 일민국제관계연구원 14 (14): 113-141, 2009

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-05-08 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal for Japanese Studies -> The Korea Journal of Japanese Studies KCI등재
    2019-04-22 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Association For Japanese Studies -> The Korean Association of Contemporary Japanese Studies KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2016-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-05-30 학술지명변경 한글명 : 日本硏究論叢 -> 일본연구논총 KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼