RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    국제근로계약에 관한 연구 = A Study on the International Employment Contracts

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101615030

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Korea has so far followed the generalized trend of globalization in the world economy, and its labor market has never yet been an exception. It is currently a common tendency from local companies going global and visa versa to now see the Korean employees working together with foreign staffs in foreign firms operating in Korea, as well as the foreign residing Korean employees working jointly with local workers in foreign operated Korean firms, and foreign workers employed to work with Korean local employees in Korean locally operated firms. In such employment relations, it is not a difficult matter to predict the legal issues arising from the application of different countries’ sometimes diverse employment laws to be disputed in the Korean court.
    The study objective of this research is to propose the integrated legal interpretation methods seeking a careful harmonization in approaching the legal issues, which to be arisen between the standpoints of labor law-side, which attempt to attaining ideology to protect the workers in the legal frame of positive law seeing them as socioeconomic weaker group, and International Court, which tries to fix its rule following certain binding points.
    Firstly various fundamental principles in American international employment contract law will be reviewed. The progressive meaning to put American law as the major subject for our comparative method is not only from its so far influences to Korean law, but also to capture the fact that the treaty of Rome has formed a basis of current American international employment contract law. The treaty sets a model to its nonmembers as well as member countries. As such, via reviewing the American case, this paper tries to analyze the common legal principles and issues governing each European country.
    Based on the identified legal principles from American law settings, this study will conduct to examine the specifics of its implementation morphologies in the area of international employment relation, from the relationship between its extent of governing employment contract law and the special connection with the practical labor law.
    Korean former theories and precedent trial cases on international employment contract law will be revised and analyzed with the critical comparative assessment on American and EU law, and finally followed by the summery proposals from its political implications.
    번역하기

    Korea has so far followed the generalized trend of globalization in the world economy, and its labor market has never yet been an exception. It is currently a common tendency from local companies going global and visa versa to now see the Korean emplo...

    Korea has so far followed the generalized trend of globalization in the world economy, and its labor market has never yet been an exception. It is currently a common tendency from local companies going global and visa versa to now see the Korean employees working together with foreign staffs in foreign firms operating in Korea, as well as the foreign residing Korean employees working jointly with local workers in foreign operated Korean firms, and foreign workers employed to work with Korean local employees in Korean locally operated firms. In such employment relations, it is not a difficult matter to predict the legal issues arising from the application of different countries’ sometimes diverse employment laws to be disputed in the Korean court.
    The study objective of this research is to propose the integrated legal interpretation methods seeking a careful harmonization in approaching the legal issues, which to be arisen between the standpoints of labor law-side, which attempt to attaining ideology to protect the workers in the legal frame of positive law seeing them as socioeconomic weaker group, and International Court, which tries to fix its rule following certain binding points.
    Firstly various fundamental principles in American international employment contract law will be reviewed. The progressive meaning to put American law as the major subject for our comparative method is not only from its so far influences to Korean law, but also to capture the fact that the treaty of Rome has formed a basis of current American international employment contract law. The treaty sets a model to its nonmembers as well as member countries. As such, via reviewing the American case, this paper tries to analyze the common legal principles and issues governing each European country.
    Based on the identified legal principles from American law settings, this study will conduct to examine the specifics of its implementation morphologies in the area of international employment relation, from the relationship between its extent of governing employment contract law and the special connection with the practical labor law.
    Korean former theories and precedent trial cases on international employment contract law will be revised and analyzed with the critical comparative assessment on American and EU law, and finally followed by the summery proposals from its political implications.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 석광현, "한국인간에 일본에서 체결된 근로계약의 준거법" 민사판례연구회 (31) : 567-622, 2009

    2 고준기, "외국에서의 국제적 노동관계를 둘러싼 법적문제" 한국기업법학회 (16) : 365-390, 2004

    3 김지형, "국제적 근로계약관계의 준거법" (68) : 2004

    4 최홍엽, "국제근로계약의 준거법과 해외투자기업 산업연수생" 서울대학교노동법연구회 (19) : 265-298, 2005

    5 석광현, "국제근로계약과 근로자보호" (13) : 2001

    6 松岡博, "渉外労働契約における競業禁止約款" 47 (47): 799-, 1997

    7 花見忠, "海外勤務の実態と法理" 日本労働協会 1987

    8 折茂豊, "当事者自治の原則" 倉文社 1970

    9 溜池良夫, "国際私法講義" 有斐閣 1993

    10 木棚照一, "国際私法槪論" 有斐閣 1991

    1 석광현, "한국인간에 일본에서 체결된 근로계약의 준거법" 민사판례연구회 (31) : 567-622, 2009

    2 고준기, "외국에서의 국제적 노동관계를 둘러싼 법적문제" 한국기업법학회 (16) : 365-390, 2004

    3 김지형, "국제적 근로계약관계의 준거법" (68) : 2004

    4 최홍엽, "국제근로계약의 준거법과 해외투자기업 산업연수생" 서울대학교노동법연구회 (19) : 265-298, 2005

    5 석광현, "국제근로계약과 근로자보호" (13) : 2001

    6 松岡博, "渉外労働契約における競業禁止約款" 47 (47): 799-, 1997

    7 花見忠, "海外勤務の実態と法理" 日本労働協会 1987

    8 折茂豊, "当事者自治の原則" 倉文社 1970

    9 溜池良夫, "国際私法講義" 有斐閣 1993

    10 木棚照一, "国際私法槪論" 有斐閣 1991

    11 石黒一憲, "国際私法" 新世社 1994

    12 山田鐐一, "国際私法" 有斐閣 1992

    13 折茂豊, "国際私法" 有斐閣 1972

    14 日本労働法学会, "国際的労働関係の法的課題" 総合労働研究所 (85) : 1995

    15 松岡博, "国際取引と国際私法" 晃洋書房 1993

    16 米津孝司, "国際労働契約法の研究31頁" 尚学社 1997

    17 樋爪誠, "債権契約の準拠法決定基準に関する『最も密接な関係国法』について" (236) : 1994

    18 川口美貴, "フランス・欧州連合(EU)における国際労働関係法の展開─国際労働契約と適用法─" 1 (1): 1996

    19 中窪裕也, "アメリカにおける解雇法理の展開" 6 (6): 81-, 1991

    20 David M. Kroeger, "Welcome to the Big World : the Emerging Tort of the Public Policy Exception To Employment At Will and its Chaotic Encounter With Conflict of Laws"

    21 Thomas G. Guedj, "The Theory of the Lois de Police, A Functional Trend In Continental Private International Law-A Comparative Analysis With Modern American Theories" 39 : 1991

    22 Stuart Dutson, "The Conflict of Laws and Statutes: The International Operation of Legislation Dealing With Matters of Civil Law in the United Kingdom and Australia" 60 : 1997

    23 State Labor Law Developments Committee, "State Labor Law Developments" 8 : 1992

    24 Schurig, Klaus, "Kllisionsnorm und Sachrecht" Kollisionsnorm 1981

    25 Reithmann, Cristof, "Internationales Vetragsrecht" Reithmann/Martiny 1988

    26 Kropholler, Jan, "Internationales Privatrecht" Kropholler 1994

    27 Kegel, Gerhard, "Internationales Privatrecht" Kegel 1995

    28 Bar, Christian von, "Internationales Privatrecht"

    29 Junker, Abbo, "Internationales Arbeitsrecht in Konzern" Konzern 1992

    30 Gamillscheg, Franz, "Internationales Arbeitsrecht" Gamill-scheg 1959

    31 Flessner, Axel, "Interessenjurisprudenz im internationalen Privatrecht" Interessenjurisprudenz 1990

    32 Friedlich K. Juenger, "General Course on Private International Law" 193 : 1983

    33 Neuhaus, Paul Heinrich, "Die Grundbegriffe des Internationalen Privatrechts" Grund- begriffe 1976

    34 Schlunck, Angelika, "Die Grenzen der Parteiautonomie im inter- nationalen Arbeitsrecht" Grenzen 1991

    35 Daübler, Wolfgang, "Das neue Internationale Arbeitsrecht"

    36 Heilmann, Frank Sven, "Das Arbeitsvertragsstatut" Heilmann 1991

    37 C. G. J. Morse, "Contracts of Employment and the E. E. C. Contractual Obligations Convention" CONTRACT CONFLICTS 1982

    38 Franz Gamillscheg, "Conflicts of Laws in Employment Contracts and Industrial Relations, In COMPARATIVE LABOUR LAW AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS IN INDUSTRIALIZED MARKET ECONOMY"

    39 Elliot E. Cheetham, "Choice of the Applicable Law" 52 : 1952

    40 ROGER C. CRAMTON, "CONFLICT OF LAWS 300"

    41 EUGENE F. SCOLES, "CONFLICT OF LAWS" Lawter's 1984

    42 SCOLES & HAY, "CONFLICT OF LAWS" Lawter's 1984

    43 FRIENDLICH K. JUENGER, "CHOICE OF LAW AND MULTISTATE JUSTICE"

    44 P. M. NORTH, "CHESHIRE & NORTH'S PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW"

    45 "Bd. 2 : Besonderer Teil"

    46 "Bd. 1 : Allgemeine Lehren"

    47 Martiny, Dieter, "Art. 27-34 EGBGB, In Münchener Kommentar zum BGBVII EGBGB/IPR" Martinay 1990

    48 Birk, Rolf, "Arbeitskollisionsrecht : Individualarbeitsrecht, in : Münchener Handbuch zum Arbeitsrecht Band 1 § 19"

    49 Brian M. Malsberger, "A STATE-BY-STATE SURVEY" chief 1996

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2017-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.74 0.74 0.67
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.59 0.53 0.667 0.39
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼