원전구조물의 비선형 시간영역 SSI 해석을 위한 경계반력법에 의한 유효지진하중과 PML의 적용|RISS 상세보기

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Considering the non-linear behavior of structure and soil when evaluating a nuclear power plant's seismic safety under a beyond-design basis earthquake is essential. In order to obtain the nonlinear response of a nuclear power plant structure, a time-domain SSI analysis method that considers the nonlinearity of soil and structure and the nonlinear Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI) effect is necessary. The Boundary Reaction Method (BRM) is a time-domain SSI analysis method. The BRM can be applied effectively with a Perfectly Matched Layer (PML), which is an effective energy absorbing boundary condition. The BRM has a characteristic that the magnitude of the response in far-field soil increases as the boundary interface of the effective seismic load moves outward. In addition, the PML has poor absorption performance of low-frequency waves. For this reason, the accuracy of the low-frequency response may be degraded when analyzing the combination of the BRM and the PML. In this study, the accuracy of the analysis response was improved by adjusting the PML input parameters to improve this problem. The accuracy of the response was evaluated by using the analysis response using KIESSI-3D, a frequency domain SSI analysis program, as a reference solution. As a result of the analysis applying the optimal PML parameter, the average error rate of the acceleration response spectrum for 9 degrees of freedom of the structure was 3.40%, which was highly similar to the reference result. In addition, time-domain nonlinear SSI analysis was performed with the soil's nonlinearity to show this study's applicability. As a result of nonlinear SSI analysis, plastic deformation was concentrated in the soil around the foundation. The analysis results found that the analysis method combining BRM and PML can be effectively applied to the seismic response analysis of nuclear power plant structures.

번역하기

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이은행 ; 김재민 ; 이상훈, "경계반력법을 이용한 지진격리 원전구조물의 비선형 지반-구조물 상호작용 해석" 한국지진공학회 19 (19): 37-43, 2015

2 Idriss IM, "User's manual for SHAKE91: a computer program for conducting equivalent linear seismic response analyses of horizontally layered soil deposits" Center for Geotechnical Modeling. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. University of California 1993

3 Fathi A, "Time-Domain Hybrid Formulations for Wave Simulations in Three-Dimensional PMLtruncated Heterogeneous Media" 101 (101): 165-198, 2015

4 Jeremić B, "Time Domain Simulation of Soil-Foundation-Structure Interaction in Non-Uniform Soils" 38 (38): 699-718, 2009

5 Ngo VL, "Semi-Automated Procedure to Estimate Nonlinear Kinematic Hardenging Model to Simulate the Nonlinear Dynamic Properties of Soil and Rock" 11 (11): 2021

6 EPRI, "Seismic Evaluation Guidance: Screening, Prioritization and Implementation Details (SPID) for the Resolution of Fukushima Near-term Task Force Recommendation 2.1: Seismic" Electric Power Research Institute 2012

7 Pled F, "Review and Recent Developments on the Perfectly Matched Layer(PML)Method for the Numerical Modeling and Simulation of Elastic Wave Propagation in Unbounded Domains" 29 : 471-518, 2022

8 Basu U, "Perfectly Matched Layers for Time-harmonic Elastodynamics of Unbounded Domains : Theory and Finite-element Implementation" 192 (192): 1337-1375, 2003

9 Chew WC, "Perfectly Matched Layers for Elastodynamics : A New Absorbing Boundary Condition" 4 (4): 341-359, 1996

10 Collino F, "Optimizing the Perfectly Matched Layer" 164 (164): 157-171, 1998