RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      역사적 관점에서 본 기업이론의 전개과정

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      For the last 50 years, particularly during the last 20 years, various theories of the business firm have appeared and theoretical disputes about the nature of modern corporation have been intensified. As the significance of the neo-classical model which assumes perfect competition and profit maximization weakened, the theory of monopolistic competition and oligopoly which seems to describe a market form common in the modern economy, managerialism and new institutional school emerged simultaneously during the 1930s, which constituted a watershed in theoretical studies of the firm. On the one hand, many theorists have been interested in the changes of corporate behavior as a variety of market structure was identified. On the other hand, as the giant corporations emerged at the end of 19th century and early 20th century, some theorists paid attention to the fact that ownership had become divorced from control, generating managerialism which includes a number of managerial models of the firm. For the last 20 years, the new institutional school attracted many social scientists` interest, which was greatly influenced by managerialism. It contains various approach such as transaction cost economics, theory of property rights, principal-agent theory and evolutionary economics, etc., explaining corporate behavior and its organizational characteristics in a broad perspective. As far as theory about modern corporation is concerned, managerialism and new institutional school are known to be representative ones. Both approaches possess common factor by recognizing the firm as an `institution`. However, while managerialism keeps wholistic position and new institutional school chooses individualistic approach in methodological aspect, the former perceives the firm as a social and historical institution and the latter perceives it as a result of individual`s rational choice in the aspect of content. The theory of corporate behavior is more diverse, more complex, and less complete than it seemed in the past. However, by investigating the implications of theoretical nature of the existing firm in reality, a desirable economic system may be sought. In this respect, the author believes this paper can contribute to the development of such system.
      번역하기

      For the last 50 years, particularly during the last 20 years, various theories of the business firm have appeared and theoretical disputes about the nature of modern corporation have been intensified. As the significance of the neo-classical model whi...

      For the last 50 years, particularly during the last 20 years, various theories of the business firm have appeared and theoretical disputes about the nature of modern corporation have been intensified. As the significance of the neo-classical model which assumes perfect competition and profit maximization weakened, the theory of monopolistic competition and oligopoly which seems to describe a market form common in the modern economy, managerialism and new institutional school emerged simultaneously during the 1930s, which constituted a watershed in theoretical studies of the firm. On the one hand, many theorists have been interested in the changes of corporate behavior as a variety of market structure was identified. On the other hand, as the giant corporations emerged at the end of 19th century and early 20th century, some theorists paid attention to the fact that ownership had become divorced from control, generating managerialism which includes a number of managerial models of the firm. For the last 20 years, the new institutional school attracted many social scientists` interest, which was greatly influenced by managerialism. It contains various approach such as transaction cost economics, theory of property rights, principal-agent theory and evolutionary economics, etc., explaining corporate behavior and its organizational characteristics in a broad perspective. As far as theory about modern corporation is concerned, managerialism and new institutional school are known to be representative ones. Both approaches possess common factor by recognizing the firm as an `institution`. However, while managerialism keeps wholistic position and new institutional school chooses individualistic approach in methodological aspect, the former perceives the firm as a social and historical institution and the latter perceives it as a result of individual`s rational choice in the aspect of content. The theory of corporate behavior is more diverse, more complex, and less complete than it seemed in the past. However, by investigating the implications of theoretical nature of the existing firm in reality, a desirable economic system may be sought. In this respect, the author believes this paper can contribute to the development of such system.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼