RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      GLOBALIZATION AND NATIONAL RESPONSES: THE CASE OF KOREA

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104726480

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In this paper, I first present a definition of globalization focused on deepened international interdependence, proliferation of relevant actors,and increased complexity of issues and problems, which all demands more effective multisectoral, collaborative problem-solving. Drawing on the existing literature on the nature and impact of globalization, I develop a typology of national responses to globalization. Using the typology, I examine the case of Korea and observe that successive Korean governments over the past few decades have all pursued a “bandwagoning” strategy,putting too much emphasis on accepting and adapting to neoliberal globalization. Considering that neoliberal globalization represents only one type of globalization, I suggest that Korea needs to pursue a more flexible national strategy to deal with multiple types of globalization. Flexibilization of Korea’s globalization strategy should begin with a careful examination of other countries’ strategies and a thorough assessment of those conditions that could enable Korea to utilize a transformative globalization strategy in alliance with other actors in global governance.
      번역하기

      In this paper, I first present a definition of globalization focused on deepened international interdependence, proliferation of relevant actors,and increased complexity of issues and problems, which all demands more effective multisectoral, collabora...

      In this paper, I first present a definition of globalization focused on deepened international interdependence, proliferation of relevant actors,and increased complexity of issues and problems, which all demands more effective multisectoral, collaborative problem-solving. Drawing on the existing literature on the nature and impact of globalization, I develop a typology of national responses to globalization. Using the typology, I examine the case of Korea and observe that successive Korean governments over the past few decades have all pursued a “bandwagoning” strategy,putting too much emphasis on accepting and adapting to neoliberal globalization. Considering that neoliberal globalization represents only one type of globalization, I suggest that Korea needs to pursue a more flexible national strategy to deal with multiple types of globalization. Flexibilization of Korea’s globalization strategy should begin with a careful examination of other countries’ strategies and a thorough assessment of those conditions that could enable Korea to utilize a transformative globalization strategy in alliance with other actors in global governance.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 임도빈, "한국 신공공관리론적 개혁에 대한 비판적 고찰 - 지방자치단체 행정서비스헌장제 도입사례 -" 한국정부학회 15 (15): 1-23, 2003

      2 하연섭, "정책아이디어와 제도변화: 우리나라에서 신자유주의의 해석과 적용을 중심으로" 한국행정연구소 44 (44): 1-27, 2006

      3 왕재선, "신자유주의 정부개혁의 다양성에 관한 연구: 국가 간 비교분석" 한국행정연구소 46 (46): 105-143, 2008

      4 안병철, "신공공관리(NPM)적 행정개혁과 제도적 정합성" 한국정부학회 18 (18): 765-792, 2006

      5 윤광재, "사르코지 정부와 이명박 정부의 행정개혁에 관한 비교연구" 한국행정학회 43 (43): 287-308, 2009

      6 Blue House, "Two Years of the Lee Myung Bak Government"

      7 Kettl, Donald F., "The Transformation of Governance: Globalization, Devolution and the Role of the Government" 60 (60): 488-497, 2000

      8 Huntington, Samuel P., "The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century" University of Oklahoma Press 1991

      9 Fougner, Tore, "The State, International Competitiveness and Neoliberal Globalisation: Is There a Future beyond ‘the Competition State’" 32 : 165-185, 2006

      10 Pempel, T. J., "The Politics of the Asian Economic Crisis" Cornell University Press 1999

      1 임도빈, "한국 신공공관리론적 개혁에 대한 비판적 고찰 - 지방자치단체 행정서비스헌장제 도입사례 -" 한국정부학회 15 (15): 1-23, 2003

      2 하연섭, "정책아이디어와 제도변화: 우리나라에서 신자유주의의 해석과 적용을 중심으로" 한국행정연구소 44 (44): 1-27, 2006

      3 왕재선, "신자유주의 정부개혁의 다양성에 관한 연구: 국가 간 비교분석" 한국행정연구소 46 (46): 105-143, 2008

      4 안병철, "신공공관리(NPM)적 행정개혁과 제도적 정합성" 한국정부학회 18 (18): 765-792, 2006

      5 윤광재, "사르코지 정부와 이명박 정부의 행정개혁에 관한 비교연구" 한국행정학회 43 (43): 287-308, 2009

      6 Blue House, "Two Years of the Lee Myung Bak Government"

      7 Kettl, Donald F., "The Transformation of Governance: Globalization, Devolution and the Role of the Government" 60 (60): 488-497, 2000

      8 Huntington, Samuel P., "The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century" University of Oklahoma Press 1991

      9 Fougner, Tore, "The State, International Competitiveness and Neoliberal Globalisation: Is There a Future beyond ‘the Competition State’" 32 : 165-185, 2006

      10 Pempel, T. J., "The Politics of the Asian Economic Crisis" Cornell University Press 1999

      11 Kim, Sunhyuk, "The Political Origins of South Korea's Economic Crisis: Is Democratization to Blame" 7 (7): 81-103, 2000

      12 Thelen, Kathleen, "The Paradox of Globalization: Labor Relations in Germany and Beyond" 36 (36): 859-880, 2003

      13 Fukuyama, Francis, "The End of History" 16 : 3-18, 1989

      14 Weyland, Kurt, "The Diffusion of Innovations: How Cognitive Heuristics Shaped Bolivia’s Pension Reform" 38 (38): 21-42, 2005

      15 Woo-Cumings, Meredith, "The Developmental State" Cornell University Press 1999

      16 김선혁, "State-Society Relations in South Korea after Democratization: Is the Strong State Defunct" 국제관계연구소 23 (23): 252-270, 2008

      17 Yeung, Henry Wai-chung, "State Intervention and Neoliberalism in the Globalizing World Economy: Lessons from Singapore’s Regionalization Programme" 13 (13): 133-152, 2000

      18 Osborne, David, "Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector" Addison Wesley 1992

      19 Pollitt, Christopher, "Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis, 2nd ed" Oxford University Press 2004

      20 Cerny, G. Philip, "Paradoxes of the Competition State: the Dynamics of Political Globalization" 32 (32): 251-274, 1997

      21 McLaughlin, Kate, "New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects" Routledge 2006

      22 Kus, Basak, "Neoliberalism, Institutional Change and the Welfare State: The Case of Britain and France" 47 (47): 488-525, 2006

      23 Choi, Byung Sun, "Internationalization and Reexamination of the Government’s Role" 33 (33): 231-268, 1994

      24 Kwon, Huck-ju, "Income Redistributional Effects of Welfare Reform in UK" 32 (32): 27-43, 1998

      25 Kim, Byeong Seob, "Governmental Reform in Korea: Achievements, Problems, and Tasks" 2005

      26 Lee, Yeonho, "Economic Reform during the Kim Dae Jung Government and the Limits of the Emergence of a Neoliberal State" 33 (33): 287-307, 1999

      27 Shin, Dong-Myeon, "Economic Policy and Social Policy: Policy-Linkages in an Era of Globalisation" 9 : 17-30, 2000

      28 Kim, Sunhyuk, "Economic Crisis and Dual Transition in South Korea: A Case Study in Comparative Perspective" Seoul National University Press 2004

      29 Pierson, Paul, "Dismantling the Welfare State?: Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment" Cambridge University Press 1994

      30 Weiss, Linda, "Developmental States in Transition: Adapting, Dismantling, Innovating, Not ‘Normalizing’" 13 (13): 21-55, 2000

      31 Yu, Hyeon Seok, "Democracy and Neoliberal Policies in the Era of Globalization" 31 (31): 233-256, 1997

      32 Kang, David C., "Crony Capitalism: Corruption and Development in South Korea and the Philippines" Cambridge University Press 2002

      33 Pak, Se Il, "Creative Globalization" Seoul National University Press 2010

      34 Brandsen, Taco, "Contextualizing the meaning of public management reforms: a comparison of the Netherlands and South Korea" SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD 76 (76): 367-386, 2010

      35 Wang, Jae Seon, "Conditions for Neoliberal Governmental Reform" 15 (15): 9-49, 2009

      36 Pak, Su Gyeong, "Characteristics of Governmental Organizational Restructuring of the Lee Myung Bak Administration" 19 : 21-47, 2009

      37 Shin, Dong Myeon, "Changes in Social Policy in the Age of Globalization" 11 (11): 40-73, 2005

      38 Pirie, Iain, "Better by Design: Korea’s Neoliberal Economy" 18 (18): 355-374, 2005

      39 Kim, Gyeong Pil, "A Politico-sociological Study of Neoliberal Conversion" 9 (9): 189-228, 2008

      40 Kim, Cheol, "A Need to Re-establish Discourse on Publicness: The Case of Governmental Restructuring of the Lee Myung Bak Government" 2008

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.29 0.29 0.28
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.25 0.27 0.381 0.05
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼