구조화된 입력처리 문법지도에 대한 학습자의 인식과 효과

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

  The purpose of the study was to investigate what kinds of learning strategies EFL learners use to learn English grammar and what is benefit from structured grammar input processing. Students of the study consisted of 48 college students who took Practical English Grammar at a university in Kyung-Gi area and were divided into two groups based on grammar scores. The students were asked to take two grammar tasks and grammar tests and complete a survey including questions on grammar strategy and input processing. The results of the study are as follows. First, learners" grammar level has an effect on use of grammar attack strategy including asking teachers, using grammar books and given contexts whereas there was no significant difference between groups in the planning strategies, Among memory strategies, using grammar exercise and linking with already known structure demonstrated a significant difference between groups. Second, with regard to input processing, high level students got higher score on how much they understood the structured grammar input compared with low level students. Third, explicit implicit instruction added to input processing seems more comprehensible and more available than structured input only, Finally, it showed that there is positive relationship between perception and score of input processing tasks and grammar tests. Especially, learners" perception of input processing correlated more with final tests and tasks. Therefore, it suggests that the more input processing task need to develop and utilize in order to facilitate learners" intake.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박혜숙, "문법의식향상을 통한 영어 관사 습득" 56 (56): 383-402, 2001

2 한상호, "대학생의 영어어휘능력과 어휘학습전략의 상관관계" 15 (15): 239-269, 2003

3 Aza, B, "Understanding and using English grammar" Longman 2004

4 Kim, Boram, "The role of focus on form in the EFL classroom setting: Looking into recast and CR tasks" 57 (57): 267-296, 2002

5 Lee, Kang-Sub, "The renaissance in formal grammar instruction and grammar consciousness raising tasks" 57 (57): 215-238, 2002

6 Kang, Dong-Ho, "The differential effects of focus-on-form instructions on EFL learners' grammar learning" 16 (16): 29-53, 2004

7 VanPatten, "Studies in Second Language Acquisition" & cadier : 225-243, 1993

8 Swain, "Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development Input in second language acquisition" Heinle & Heinle Publisher 235-253, 1985

9 Guilloteaux, M, "Psychological verbs: comprehensive based vs. production based grammar instruction" 56 (56): 93-112, 2001

10 Swan, M, "Practical English usage" Oxford University Press 2005

11 Doughty, C, "Pedagogical choices in focus on form" Cambridge University Press 197-261, 1998

12 Gass,S, "Language transfer and universal grammatical relations" 27 (27): 327-344, 1980

13 Hwang, Jong-Bai, "L2 acquisition of English unaccusative verbs under implicit and explicit learning conditions" 54 (54): 145-176, 1999

14 Park, J. U, "Korean EFL learners' vocabulary learning strategies" 56 (56): 3-30, 2001

15 Ellis, R, "Investigating form-focused instruction" 51 (51): 1-46, 2001

16 VanPatten, B, "Input processing and grammar instruction" Ablex 1996

17 VanPatten,B, "Grammar teaching for the acquisition-rich classroom" 26 (26): 435-450, 1993

18 Cheng, A, "Grammar instruction and input processing: The acquisition of Spanish ser and estar" University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1995

19 Long, M, "Focus on form: Theory, research and practice, Focus on form in classroom second language acquisitio" Cambridge University Press 15-41, 1998

20 Hwang, Jong-Bai, "Focus on form and the L2 learning of English unaccusative verbs" 56 (56): 111-133, 2001

21 Lee, Hwa-ja, "A comparative study on the awareness of grammar instructional approach by EFL teachers and learners" 60 (60): 69-96, 2005