RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    미국 초등학교 환경교육과정 개발 및 평가체제 분석 = Analysis of Curriculum Development and Evaluation System in Environmental Education of an Elementary School in the U.S.

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3102910

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The main purpose of this study is to give an analysis of public elementary school environmental education curriculum development, and also to give an analysis of elementary curriculum evaluation from an environmental educational view compiled by the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction(WDPI). For this study various documents and literature related to the subject were reviewed and analyzed. Also, in-depth dialogues were conducted with professionals, curriculum directors, administrators, principals and teachers by interviews, phone-calls and e-mails. In the United States, local communities and states historically have the right to decide what is taught in schools. In each district and school, teachers have the right to decide what is taught and how it is taught. However, they must take into consideration state law, policies, and guidelines. State law specifies all subjects at all grade levels that must be taught in public elementary school. The WDPI publishes guidelines for teachers of all subjects to guide their new curriculum frameworks. These guides are generally much less specific and are intended to allow districts, schools and teachers to make their own decisions in creating a balance between depth and breadth of each subject`s content. Thus, teachers, schools, and districts can design their own set of course offerings and course syllabi within state guidelines. Curriculum development and implementation require this network of sample organizational structure for orderly development, implementation, and evaluation of curriculum change. Wisconsin`s historical commitment to environmental education is well-known. WDPI has developed A Guide to Curriculum Planning in Environmental Education. The guide has been widely used in the United States and in more than 40 other countries(WDPI, 1994: V). This guide includes procedures for developing an environmental education curriculum plan and for assessing the plan. These procedures for assessing the plan should be a continuous activity. The evaluation model of an environmental education is a hybrid model adapted by Thomas Marcinkowski from several sources in environmental education literature. It portrays the important elements of evaluation, planning, and implementation. Finally, from this study`s results I drew the following conclusions for the application of the 7th curriculum development and evaluation of our country. First of all, we should present the direct of curriculum development and evaluation in the post modernism, constructionism and critical pedagogy`s point of view. Second, government, school districts and schools must be closely related organically. Third, revisions and evaluations of curriculum should be made with a long interval and with sufficient time according to subjects. Fourth, curriculum development teams should cooperate and collaborate when subjects overlap. Fifth, we also should establish diverse evaluation institutes to develop and evaluate school based curriculum to help classroom teachers. Each elementary school should set up environmental education subject and develop each subject curriculum model include an environmental curriculum model. Finally, we should establish the system cooperation of the agencies concerned in environmental education.
    번역하기

    The main purpose of this study is to give an analysis of public elementary school environmental education curriculum development, and also to give an analysis of elementary curriculum evaluation from an environmental educational view compiled by the W...

    The main purpose of this study is to give an analysis of public elementary school environmental education curriculum development, and also to give an analysis of elementary curriculum evaluation from an environmental educational view compiled by the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction(WDPI). For this study various documents and literature related to the subject were reviewed and analyzed. Also, in-depth dialogues were conducted with professionals, curriculum directors, administrators, principals and teachers by interviews, phone-calls and e-mails. In the United States, local communities and states historically have the right to decide what is taught in schools. In each district and school, teachers have the right to decide what is taught and how it is taught. However, they must take into consideration state law, policies, and guidelines. State law specifies all subjects at all grade levels that must be taught in public elementary school. The WDPI publishes guidelines for teachers of all subjects to guide their new curriculum frameworks. These guides are generally much less specific and are intended to allow districts, schools and teachers to make their own decisions in creating a balance between depth and breadth of each subject`s content. Thus, teachers, schools, and districts can design their own set of course offerings and course syllabi within state guidelines. Curriculum development and implementation require this network of sample organizational structure for orderly development, implementation, and evaluation of curriculum change. Wisconsin`s historical commitment to environmental education is well-known. WDPI has developed A Guide to Curriculum Planning in Environmental Education. The guide has been widely used in the United States and in more than 40 other countries(WDPI, 1994: V). This guide includes procedures for developing an environmental education curriculum plan and for assessing the plan. These procedures for assessing the plan should be a continuous activity. The evaluation model of an environmental education is a hybrid model adapted by Thomas Marcinkowski from several sources in environmental education literature. It portrays the important elements of evaluation, planning, and implementation. Finally, from this study`s results I drew the following conclusions for the application of the 7th curriculum development and evaluation of our country. First of all, we should present the direct of curriculum development and evaluation in the post modernism, constructionism and critical pedagogy`s point of view. Second, government, school districts and schools must be closely related organically. Third, revisions and evaluations of curriculum should be made with a long interval and with sufficient time according to subjects. Fourth, curriculum development teams should cooperate and collaborate when subjects overlap. Fifth, we also should establish diverse evaluation institutes to develop and evaluate school based curriculum to help classroom teachers. Each elementary school should set up environmental education subject and develop each subject curriculum model include an environmental curriculum model. Finally, we should establish the system cooperation of the agencies concerned in environmental education.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼