RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    디지털 규율인가, 민간 리스크인가? -법정화폐 기반 스테이블코인에 대한 경제학 관점을 바탕으로 = Digital Discipline or Private Risk? A History of Economic Thought Perspective on Fiat-Backed Stablecoins

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110174821

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Fiat-backed stablecoins are digital assets peg one-to-one with sovereign currencies and have emerged as a pillar of financial innovation. This paper examines stablecoins through the theoretical frameworks of the Classical, Keynesian, and Austrian schools of economics. From the Classical and Monetarist perspective, stablecoins raise doubts about whether they truly offer a solid “real anchor” or operate under transparent and consistent “rules.” Keynesians, meanwhile, argue that the global spread of large-scale stablecoins could erode national monetary sovereignty and accelerate “digital dollarization”. In contrast, the Austrian school views the stablecoin ecosystem as a real-world experiment in monetary rivalry, raising the key question of whether this competition will drive a “race to the top” or a “race to the bottom”. The future trajectory of stablecoins depends on whether regulatory frameworks can balance private-sector innovation with the need to maintain monetary and financial stability.
    번역하기

    Fiat-backed stablecoins are digital assets peg one-to-one with sovereign currencies and have emerged as a pillar of financial innovation. This paper examines stablecoins through the theoretical frameworks of the Classical, Keynesian, and Austrian scho...

    Fiat-backed stablecoins are digital assets peg one-to-one with sovereign currencies and have emerged as a pillar of financial innovation. This paper examines stablecoins through the theoretical frameworks of the Classical, Keynesian, and Austrian schools of economics. From the Classical and Monetarist perspective, stablecoins raise doubts about whether they truly offer a solid “real anchor” or operate under transparent and consistent “rules.” Keynesians, meanwhile, argue that the global spread of large-scale stablecoins could erode national monetary sovereignty and accelerate “digital dollarization”. In contrast, the Austrian school views the stablecoin ecosystem as a real-world experiment in monetary rivalry, raising the key question of whether this competition will drive a “race to the top” or a “race to the bottom”. The future trajectory of stablecoins depends on whether regulatory frameworks can balance private-sector innovation with the need to maintain monetary and financial stability.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼