RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    環境人權으로서의 環境行政節次 參與權- 오르후스協約 제2기둥의 內容과 示唆點 - = The Right to Public Participation in Environmental Decision-Making as Environmental Procedural Rights- The Second Pillar of the Aarhus Convention -

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104972261

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper addresses the public participation in environmental decision-making as environmental human rights, devoting most the discussion to the Aarhus Convention, which was concluded in 1998 by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Public participation in decision-making is the second pillar of the Convention, which is found in articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Convention.
    Article 6 concerns public participation in decision-making by public authorites on whether to permit or license specific activities.
    Article 7 covers public participation with respect to plans, programmes and policies.
    Articel 8 sets out the public participation during the preparation of executive regulations and/or generally applicable legally binding normative instruments.
    The following categories of public participation are especially in this paper pointed out;-The public must be informed, early in the environmental decision-making procedure- The procedural time-frames must allow for genuine public participation.
    - The final decision to authorise the activity must take due account of the outcome of the public participation.
    - The public must take part in the procedures concerning plans, programmes and policies relating to the Environment.
    - Public participation must be ensured also in the preparation of environmental policies as well as standards and legislation that may have a significant effect on the environment.
    Finally, the paper compare current Korean Administratve Procedure Act with emerging international trends such as the Arhus Convention.
    번역하기

    This paper addresses the public participation in environmental decision-making as environmental human rights, devoting most the discussion to the Aarhus Convention, which was concluded in 1998 by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Publ...

    This paper addresses the public participation in environmental decision-making as environmental human rights, devoting most the discussion to the Aarhus Convention, which was concluded in 1998 by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Public participation in decision-making is the second pillar of the Convention, which is found in articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Convention.
    Article 6 concerns public participation in decision-making by public authorites on whether to permit or license specific activities.
    Article 7 covers public participation with respect to plans, programmes and policies.
    Articel 8 sets out the public participation during the preparation of executive regulations and/or generally applicable legally binding normative instruments.
    The following categories of public participation are especially in this paper pointed out;-The public must be informed, early in the environmental decision-making procedure- The procedural time-frames must allow for genuine public participation.
    - The final decision to authorise the activity must take due account of the outcome of the public participation.
    - The public must take part in the procedures concerning plans, programmes and policies relating to the Environment.
    - Public participation must be ensured also in the preparation of environmental policies as well as standards and legislation that may have a significant effect on the environment.
    Finally, the paper compare current Korean Administratve Procedure Act with emerging international trends such as the Arhus Convention.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.84 0.84 0.73
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.69 0.69 0.687 0.35
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼