RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    미국 교육바우처의 효과 분석: 무작위실험 사례를 중심으로 = A Review of the Effects of School Vouchers in the United States: Empirical Studies with Randomized Experimental Designs

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104157978

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study summarizes the current status and performance of educational voucher programs in the United States. The programs feature a type of means-tested voucher especially for the poor. They consist of two forms of vouchers supported either by government or private foundations. This study analyzes the effectiveness of randomized voucher programs. Recent empirical studies have reported a consistently high level of satisfaction with them among US parents. In addition, there have been remarkable academic achievements in math and reading for blacks. However, the positive effects of the voucher on short-term academic performance are still controversial. Further studies are required to explore the effects of the expansion of voucher programs on public schools and on the performance of private non-sectarian schools. The recent experiences of Chile and Columbia, where national experiments of educational vouchers have been conducted, can provide various policy implications for this future research.
    번역하기

    This study summarizes the current status and performance of educational voucher programs in the United States. The programs feature a type of means-tested voucher especially for the poor. They consist of two forms of vouchers supported either by gover...

    This study summarizes the current status and performance of educational voucher programs in the United States. The programs feature a type of means-tested voucher especially for the poor. They consist of two forms of vouchers supported either by government or private foundations. This study analyzes the effectiveness of randomized voucher programs. Recent empirical studies have reported a consistently high level of satisfaction with them among US parents. In addition, there have been remarkable academic achievements in math and reading for blacks. However, the positive effects of the voucher on short-term academic performance are still controversial. Further studies are required to explore the effects of the expansion of voucher programs on public schools and on the performance of private non-sectarian schools. The recent experiences of Chile and Columbia, where national experiments of educational vouchers have been conducted, can provide various policy implications for this future research.

    더보기

    국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    본 연구는 미국의 교육바우처의 현황과 그 성과를 살펴보고 있다. 이 프로그램은 빈곤집단을 대상으로 한 자산형 바우처(means tested voucher)의 성격을 가지고 있다. 미국의 교육바우처는 주정부 또는 연방정부가 지원하는 것과 민간재단이 지원하는 것으로 구분된다. 본 연구는 이 중에서 무작위 실험연구가 가능한 프로그램들의 효과를 분석하고 있다. 최근 실증연구에 따르면 미국 교육바우처에 대한 학부모의 만족도는 매우 높다. 특히 교육바우처의 학업향상효과는 흑인집단과 산수과목에서 두드러진다. 하지만 교육바우처의 이용으로 단기간에 나타난 학업성적의 향상 정도에 대해서는 다소 논란이 있다. 앞으로 교육바우처가 확대된다면 기존 공립학교가 어떤 영향을 받을지 그리고 여기에 참여하는 비종교계통의 사립학교들이 어떤 성과를 거둘지 추가 연구가 필요하다. 이와 관련하여 칠레나 콜롬비아처럼 대규모 교육바우처를 시행한 국가들의 경험은 향후 연구에 좋은 시사점을 제공할 수 있을 것이다.
    번역하기

    본 연구는 미국의 교육바우처의 현황과 그 성과를 살펴보고 있다. 이 프로그램은 빈곤집단을 대상으로 한 자산형 바우처(means tested voucher)의 성격을 가지고 있다. 미국의 교육바우처는 주정...

    본 연구는 미국의 교육바우처의 현황과 그 성과를 살펴보고 있다. 이 프로그램은 빈곤집단을 대상으로 한 자산형 바우처(means tested voucher)의 성격을 가지고 있다. 미국의 교육바우처는 주정부 또는 연방정부가 지원하는 것과 민간재단이 지원하는 것으로 구분된다. 본 연구는 이 중에서 무작위 실험연구가 가능한 프로그램들의 효과를 분석하고 있다. 최근 실증연구에 따르면 미국 교육바우처에 대한 학부모의 만족도는 매우 높다. 특히 교육바우처의 학업향상효과는 흑인집단과 산수과목에서 두드러진다. 하지만 교육바우처의 이용으로 단기간에 나타난 학업성적의 향상 정도에 대해서는 다소 논란이 있다. 앞으로 교육바우처가 확대된다면 기존 공립학교가 어떤 영향을 받을지 그리고 여기에 참여하는 비종교계통의 사립학교들이 어떤 성과를 거둘지 추가 연구가 필요하다. 이와 관련하여 칠레나 콜롬비아처럼 대규모 교육바우처를 시행한 국가들의 경험은 향후 연구에 좋은 시사점을 제공할 수 있을 것이다.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 주철환, "학교선택권의 보장을 위한 학교체제 재구조화 방안에 관한 연구" 7 : 123-149, 2002

    2 성열관, "종교교육과정과 바우처 제도에 관한 일 고찰" 20 (20): 23-42, 2004

    3 정광호, "바우처 연구" 법문사 2008

    4 Contreras,D., "Vouchers, School Choice and the Access to Higher Education" Yale University Economic Growth Center Discussion Paper No. 845. 2002

    5 Angrist, J., "Vouchers for Private Schooling in Colombia: Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment" 92 : 1535-1558, 2002

    6 Gauri, V., "Vouchers for Basic Education in Developing Economies: An Accountability Perspective" 19 (19): 259-280, 2004

    7 Bolick,C., "Voucher Wars: Waging the Legal Battle over School Choice" The Cato Institute 2003

    8 Howell, W. G., "Uses of Theory in Randomized Field Trials: Lessons from School Voucher Research on Disaggregation, Missing Data, and the Generalization of Findings" 47 (47): 634-657, 2004

    9 West,E.G., "Tom Paine's Voucher Scheme for Public Education" 33 : 378-382, 1967

    10 Fiske, E. B., "The Voucher Debate after Zelman v. Simmons-Harris: The Need to Focus on Core Education Issues" Education Reform, 2(1), Center for Child and Family Policy. Duke University 2002

    1 주철환, "학교선택권의 보장을 위한 학교체제 재구조화 방안에 관한 연구" 7 : 123-149, 2002

    2 성열관, "종교교육과정과 바우처 제도에 관한 일 고찰" 20 (20): 23-42, 2004

    3 정광호, "바우처 연구" 법문사 2008

    4 Contreras,D., "Vouchers, School Choice and the Access to Higher Education" Yale University Economic Growth Center Discussion Paper No. 845. 2002

    5 Angrist, J., "Vouchers for Private Schooling in Colombia: Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment" 92 : 1535-1558, 2002

    6 Gauri, V., "Vouchers for Basic Education in Developing Economies: An Accountability Perspective" 19 (19): 259-280, 2004

    7 Bolick,C., "Voucher Wars: Waging the Legal Battle over School Choice" The Cato Institute 2003

    8 Howell, W. G., "Uses of Theory in Randomized Field Trials: Lessons from School Voucher Research on Disaggregation, Missing Data, and the Generalization of Findings" 47 (47): 634-657, 2004

    9 West,E.G., "Tom Paine's Voucher Scheme for Public Education" 33 : 378-382, 1967

    10 Fiske, E. B., "The Voucher Debate after Zelman v. Simmons-Harris: The Need to Focus on Core Education Issues" Education Reform, 2(1), Center for Child and Family Policy. Duke University 2002

    11 Friedman, M., "The Role of Government in Education in Economics and the Public Interest" Rutgers University Press 123-144, 1955

    12 McEwan,P.J., "The Potential Impact of Vouchers" 79 (79): 57-80, 2004

    13 McEwan,P.J., "The Potential Impact of Large-scale Voucher Programs" 70 : 103-149, 2000

    14 Ryan, J., "The Political Economy of School Choice" 111 (111): 2043-2136, 2002

    15 Witte,J.F., "The Milwaukee Voucher Experiment" 20 (20): 229-251, 1998

    16 Witte,J.F., "The Market Approach to Education: An Analysis of America's First Voucher Program" Princeton University Press 2000

    17 Belfield,C.R., "The Evidence on Education Vouchers: An Application to the Cleveland Scholarship and Tutoring Program" 2005

    18 Peterson, P. E., "The Effects of School Choice in New York City Earning and Learning: How Schools Matter" Brookings Institution Press and Russell Sage Foundation 317-339, 1999

    19 Belfield, C. R., "The Effects of Competition between Schools on Educational Outcomes" 72 : 279-341, 2002

    20 Jepsen,C., "The Effectiveness of Catholic Primary Schooling" Northwestern University 1999

    21 Greene,J.P., "The Effect of School Choice: An Evaluation of the Charlotte Children’s Scholarship Fund" 1 (1): 55-60, 2001

    22 Howell, W. G., "The Education Gap: Vouchers and Urban Public Schools" Brookings Institution Press 2002

    23 Hoxby, C. M., "The Economics of School Choice" University of Chicago Press 2003

    24 Peterson, P. E., "School Vouchers: Results from Randomized Experiments" University of Chicago Press: Chicago 1-22, 2003

    25 Ladd,H.F., "School Vouchers: A Critical View" 16 (16): 3-24, 2002

    26 Rouse, C. E., "School Vouchers and Student Achievement: Recent Evidence, Remaining Questions" 1 : 1-49, 2009

    27 Howell, W. G., "School Vouchers and Academic Performance: Results from Three Randomized Field Trials" 21 (21): 191-218, 2002

    28 Wolf,P.J., "School Voucher Programs: What the Research Says About Parental School Choice" 1 : 415-446, 2008

    29 Mizala, A., "School Performance and Choice: The Chilean Experience" 35 (35): 392-417, 2000

    30 Mayer, D. P., "School Choice in New York City After Three Years: An Evaluation of the School Choice Scholarships Program" 2002

    31 Howell, W. G., "School Choice in Dayton, Ohio: An Evaluation After One Year" Harvard University 2000

    32 Burke,L., "School Choice in America 2009: What It Means for Children's Futures" The Heritage Foundation 2009

    33 Cowen,Joshua M., "School Choice as a Latent Variable: Estimating the ‘Complier Average Causal Effect' of Vouchers in Charlotte" 36 (36): 301-315, 2008

    34 Figlio, D. N., "School Choice and Student Performance: Are Private Schools Really Better?" 18 : 115-140, 1999

    35 Daniels, R. J., "Rethinking the Welfare State: The Propsects for Government by Voucher" Routledge 학지사 2005

    36 Wolf, P., "Results of a School Voucher Experiment: The Case of Washington D.C. After Two Years" 2001

    37 Kremer,M., "Randomized Evaluations of Educational Programs in Developing Countries: Some Lessons" 93 (93): 102-106, 2003

    38 McGeorge,C., "Private and Integrated Schools in New Zealand: Subsidizing the Illusion of Choice" 10 (10): 259-270, 1995

    39 Sander,W., "Private Schools and Public School Achievement" 34 (34): 697-709, 1999

    40 Witte,J.F., "Private School versus Public School Achievement: Are There Findings That Should Affect the Educational Choice Debate?" 11 (11): 371-394, 1992

    41 Rouse, Cecilia Elena, "Private School Vouchers and Student Achievement: An Evaluation of the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program" 113 (113): 553-602, 1998

    42 Couch, J. F., "Private School Enrollments and Public School Performance" 76 (76): 301-312, 1993

    43 Rangvid,B.C., "Private School Diversity in Denmark's National Voucher System" 52 (52): 331-354, 2008

    44 Barnard, J., "Principal Stratification Approach to Broken Randomized Experiments: A Case Study of School Choice Vouchers in New York City" 98 (98): 299-323, 2003

    45 Chubb, J. E., "Politics, Markets, and America's Schools" Brookings Institution 1990

    46 McMillan,R., "Parental Pressure and Private School Competition: An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of Public School Quality" Stanford University 1998

    47 Carnoy,M., "National Voucher Plans in Chile and Sweden: Did Privatization Reforms Make for Better Education?" 42 (42): 309-337, 1998

    48 Coulson,A.J., "Market Education: The Unknown History" Transaction Publishers 1999

    49 Angrist, J., "Long-Term Educational Consequences of Secondary School Vouchers: Evidence from Administrative Records in Colombia" 96 : 847-862, 2006

    50 Kremer, M., "Improving Education in the Developing World: What Have We Learned from Randomized Evaluations?" 1 : 513-545, 2009

    51 Green.D., "How a Voucher Scheme Brought Hope to Harlem" 1995

    52 Neal,D., "How Vouchers Could Change the Market for Education" 16 (16): 25-44, 2002

    53 Grogger, J., "Further Evidence on the Effects of Catholic Secondary Schooling in Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs" Brookings Institution 2000

    54 Wolf, P., "Evaluation of the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program: Impacts after Three Years. U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences" U.S. Government Printing Office 2009

    55 Wolf, P., "Evaluation of the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship program: Impacts after Two Years. U.S. Department of Education" Institute of Education Science 2008

    56 Wolf, P., "Evaluation of the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program: Impacts after One Year. U.S. Department of Education" Institute of Education Science 2007

    57 Peterson, P. E., "Efficiency, Bias, and Classification Schemes: A Response to Alan B. Krueger and Pei Zhu" 47 : 699-719, 2004

    58 Greene, J. P., "Effectiveness of School Choice: The Milwaukee Experiment" 31 (31): 190-213, 1999

    59 Levin,H.M., "Educational Vouchers: Effectiveness, Choice, and Costs" 17 (17): 373-391, 1998

    60 Peterson,P.E., "Education: The Case for Vouchers. Hoover Digest : Research and Opinion on Public Policy"

    61 West,E.G., "Education Vouchers in Principle and Practice: A Survey" 12 (12): 83-103, 1997

    62 Hoxby,C.M., "Does Competition among Public Schools Benefit Students and Taxpayers?" 90 : 1209-1238, 2000

    63 Hoxby,C.M., "Do Private Schools Provide Competition for Public Schools?" National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. 1994

    64 Arum,R., "Do Private Schools Force Public Schools to Compete?" 61 (61): 29-46, 1996

    65 Levin, H, M., "Costs of an Educational Voucher System" 5 (5): 265-283, 1997

    66 Ensor,T., "Consumer-led, Demand-Side Financing in Health and Education and its Relevance for Low- and Middle-Income Countries" 19 : 267-285, 2003

    67 Dee,T.S., "Competition and the Quality of Public Schools" 17 (17): 419-427, 1998

    68 Bryk, A. S., "Catholic Schools and the Common Good" Harvard University Press 1993

    69 Friedman, M., "Capitalism and Freedom" University of Chicago Press 1962

    70 Wylie,C., "Can Vouchers Better Education? A Review of the Literature with Special Reference to New Zealand"

    71 Krueger, A. B., "Another Look at the New York City School Voucher Experiment" 47 (47): 699-717, 2004

    72 Hoxby,C.M., "Analyzing School Reforms that Use America's Traditional Forms of Parental Choice" Brookings Press 133-155, 1998

    73 Peterson, P. E., "An Evaluation of the Cleveland Voucher Program After Two Years" Harvard Program on Education Policy and Government Working Paper 1999

    74 Hess,F.M., "After Milwaukee" The Journal of American Enterprise Institute 2008

    75 Belfield,C.R., "Achievement effects of the Cleveland Scholarship and Tutoring Program" Working Paper Department of Economics Queen’s University 2007

    76 Greene, J. P., "A Survey of Results from Voucher Experiments: Where We Are and What We Know" Manhattan Institute for Policy Research 1-22, 2000

    77 Dolton,Peter, "A Review of ‘The Economics of School Choice" 113 (113): F167-F179, 2003

    78 van Vliet, W., "A Nineteenth-Century French Proposal to Use School Vouchers" 26 (26): 95-103, 1982

    79 Levin,H.M., "A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Educational Vouchers" 24 (24): 159-174, 2002

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.29 1.29 1.18
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.39 1.32 1.39 0.26
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼