RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS

    Evaluation of the Agreement between Immunodot Assays and Intradermal Skin Testing or Favrot Diagnostic Criteria in Canine Atopic Dermatitis

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104695528

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study was undertaken to identify differences between atopic and non-atopic dogs in three rapid screeningimmunodot assays as well as the ability of the assays to predict the results of intradermal skin testing (IDST) or Favrotdiagnostic criteria (FDC). Twenty-nine dogs diagnosed with canine atopic dermatitis (CAD) were selected as the atopicgroup. Twenty-five dogs without CAD were included as the non-atopic group. Three types of immunodot assays wereconducted on all serum samples from both groups: Allercept E-screen 2nd generation (ES2G), Canine Allergic TendencyReference Test (ALERT), and Asan Easy Test Canine IgE (AETC). IDST, which included 39 allergens, and immunodotassays were performed concurrently in 13 dogs from the atopic group and compared. While there were no significantdifferences in positivity between the two groups in the evaluation of ALERT (P = 0.435) and AETC (P = 0.313),positivity in ES2G testing was significantly higher in the non-atopic group than the atopic group (P = 0.038). TheES2G, ALERT, and AETC results showed fair (κ = 0.235), slight (κ = 0.133), and slight (κ = 0.014) accordance withIDST, respectively. The outcomes of ES2G, ALERT, and AETC indicated poor (κ = −0.211), slight (κ = 0.106), andslight (κ = 0.087) agreement with FDC. In conclusion, rapid screening immunodot assays were not useful for thediagnosis of CAD. These assays may provide a supplementary method for predicting the results of IDST in atopic dogs.
    번역하기

    This study was undertaken to identify differences between atopic and non-atopic dogs in three rapid screeningimmunodot assays as well as the ability of the assays to predict the results of intradermal skin testing (IDST) or Favrotdiagnostic criteria (...

    This study was undertaken to identify differences between atopic and non-atopic dogs in three rapid screeningimmunodot assays as well as the ability of the assays to predict the results of intradermal skin testing (IDST) or Favrotdiagnostic criteria (FDC). Twenty-nine dogs diagnosed with canine atopic dermatitis (CAD) were selected as the atopicgroup. Twenty-five dogs without CAD were included as the non-atopic group. Three types of immunodot assays wereconducted on all serum samples from both groups: Allercept E-screen 2nd generation (ES2G), Canine Allergic TendencyReference Test (ALERT), and Asan Easy Test Canine IgE (AETC). IDST, which included 39 allergens, and immunodotassays were performed concurrently in 13 dogs from the atopic group and compared. While there were no significantdifferences in positivity between the two groups in the evaluation of ALERT (P = 0.435) and AETC (P = 0.313),positivity in ES2G testing was significantly higher in the non-atopic group than the atopic group (P = 0.038). TheES2G, ALERT, and AETC results showed fair (κ = 0.235), slight (κ = 0.133), and slight (κ = 0.014) accordance withIDST, respectively. The outcomes of ES2G, ALERT, and AETC indicated poor (κ = −0.211), slight (κ = 0.106), andslight (κ = 0.087) agreement with FDC. In conclusion, rapid screening immunodot assays were not useful for thediagnosis of CAD. These assays may provide a supplementary method for predicting the results of IDST in atopic dogs.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Landis JR, "The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data" 33 : 159-174, 1977

    2 Olivry T, "The ACVD task force on canine atopic dermatitis: forewords and lexicon" 81 : 143-146, 2001

    3 DeBoer DJ, "The ACVD task force on canine atopic dermatitis (XVII): intradermal testing" 81 : 289-304, 2001

    4 DeBoer DJ, "The ACVD task force on canine atopic dermatitis (XVI): laboratory evaluation of dogs with atopic dermatitis with serum-based “allergy” tests" 81 : 277-287, 2001

    5 Diesel A, "Serum allergen-specific immunoglobulin E in atopic and healthy cats: comparison of a rapid screening immunoassay and complete-panel analysis" 22 : 39-45, 2011

    6 Halliwell R, "Revised nomenclature for veterinary allergy" 114 : 207-208, 2006

    7 Olivry T, "New diagnostic criteria for canine atopic dermatitis" 21 : 124-127, 2010

    8 German AJ, "Measurement of IgG, IgM and IgA concentrations in canine serum, saliva, tears and bile" 64 : 107-121, 1998

    9 Halliwell REW, "Induced and spontaneous IgE antibodies to Dermatophagoides farinae in dogs and cats: evidence of functional heterogeneity of IgE" 9 : 179-184, 1998

    10 Olivry T, "Evaluation of the agreement between allergen specific intradermal or IgE serological tests and a point-ofcare immunodot assay in dogs with atopic dermatitis" 22 : 284-285, 2011

    1 Landis JR, "The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data" 33 : 159-174, 1977

    2 Olivry T, "The ACVD task force on canine atopic dermatitis: forewords and lexicon" 81 : 143-146, 2001

    3 DeBoer DJ, "The ACVD task force on canine atopic dermatitis (XVII): intradermal testing" 81 : 289-304, 2001

    4 DeBoer DJ, "The ACVD task force on canine atopic dermatitis (XVI): laboratory evaluation of dogs with atopic dermatitis with serum-based “allergy” tests" 81 : 277-287, 2001

    5 Diesel A, "Serum allergen-specific immunoglobulin E in atopic and healthy cats: comparison of a rapid screening immunoassay and complete-panel analysis" 22 : 39-45, 2011

    6 Halliwell R, "Revised nomenclature for veterinary allergy" 114 : 207-208, 2006

    7 Olivry T, "New diagnostic criteria for canine atopic dermatitis" 21 : 124-127, 2010

    8 German AJ, "Measurement of IgG, IgM and IgA concentrations in canine serum, saliva, tears and bile" 64 : 107-121, 1998

    9 Halliwell REW, "Induced and spontaneous IgE antibodies to Dermatophagoides farinae in dogs and cats: evidence of functional heterogeneity of IgE" 9 : 179-184, 1998

    10 Olivry T, "Evaluation of the agreement between allergen specific intradermal or IgE serological tests and a point-ofcare immunodot assay in dogs with atopic dermatitis" 22 : 284-285, 2011

    11 Hill PB, "Concentrations of total serum IgE, IgA, and IgG in atopic and parasitized dogs" 44 : 105-113, 1995

    12 Park S, "Comparison of response to immunotherapy by intradermal skin test and antigen-specific IgE in canine atopy" 62 : 983-988, 2000

    13 이예슬, "Comparison of rapid screening immunoassay and intradermal test for canine atopic dermatitis" 동물의학연구소 16 (16): 115-120, 2015

    14 Foster AP, "Comparison of intradermal and serum testing for allergen-specific IgE using a FcεRIα-based assay in atopic dogs in the UK" 93 : 51-60, 2003

    15 Zunic M, "Comparison between immunodot tests and the intradermal skin test in atopic dogs" 9 : 201-206, 1998

    16 김하정, "Common allergens of atopic dermatitis in dogs: comparative findings based on intradermal tests" 대한수의학회 12 (12): 287-290, 2011

    17 Zur G, "Canine atopic dermatitis:a retrospective study of 266 cases examined at the University of California, Davis, 1992-1998. Part I. Clinical features and allergy testing results" 13 : 89-102, 2002

    18 Le Roy L, "Canine atopic dermatitis diagnostic criteria:evaluation of four sets of published criteria among veterinary students" 42 : 79-84, 2015

    19 Favrot C, "A prospective study on the clinical features of chronic canine atopic dermatitis and its diagnosis" 21 : 23-31, 2010

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.05 0.05 0.04
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.04 0.04 0.213 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼