RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    `감성`의 측면으로 본 동서양의 공예론 -윌리엄 모리스와 야나기 무네요시를 중심으로 - = On the Craft Theory in Asian and Western from a View Point of Sensibility-Focused on William Morris and Yanagi Muneyoshi-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103205011

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The craft has played a role of simply additional beauty as the decorative and applied art by the master craftsman when the fine art that the western modern times has given the birth was recognized as the best beauty until the modernism era by excluding the usability in the 18th century. The interest for the craft respectively starting with the head of Art and Craft Movement of J. Ruskin and W. Morris in the West, as the starting point with the Folk crafts movement of Yanagi Muneyoshi (柳宗悅) in the East has been aroused rapidly under such circumstances. By the way, how the concept called the crafts in the thought of Morris and Yanagi can be tied as the same concept indeed?
    It would be difficult to find the aesthetic characteristic of certain common in molding elements among these crafts if you recall the curve and elegant art crafts of Arts and Crafts Movement that the medieval art of West shall be the model and the simple and elegant crafts of Folk crafts that Yanagi pursued. Although Yanagi and Morris emphasized the importance of crafts equally, it is because the difference that their emotion grown in a different cultural background called the East and West respectively as well are exposed in their view of art and work definitely.
    This paper would reconsider the difference of the emotion of Westerns in Art and Crafts and the emotion of Asian in Folk crafts on the basis of the point that the view of point about artwork has no alternative but to be different naturally if the emotion is different like this. By doing so, it aims to provide the key seeking the new direction of crafts in our climate of crafts world getting a lot of control still in the viewpoint overlooking the crafts in modern Western eyes after the Japanese colonial era.
    It has been noted that whereas Yanagi responded to the tactual sense like the ceramic sensitively out of especially crafts field, Morris responded to the pictorial art of textile or wallpaper, etc. mainly by comparatively analyzing the difference concretely in the aesthetic sensibility of Yanagi and Morris with the representative crafts they made or collected.
    번역하기

    The craft has played a role of simply additional beauty as the decorative and applied art by the master craftsman when the fine art that the western modern times has given the birth was recognized as the best beauty until the modernism era by excludin...

    The craft has played a role of simply additional beauty as the decorative and applied art by the master craftsman when the fine art that the western modern times has given the birth was recognized as the best beauty until the modernism era by excluding the usability in the 18th century. The interest for the craft respectively starting with the head of Art and Craft Movement of J. Ruskin and W. Morris in the West, as the starting point with the Folk crafts movement of Yanagi Muneyoshi (柳宗悅) in the East has been aroused rapidly under such circumstances. By the way, how the concept called the crafts in the thought of Morris and Yanagi can be tied as the same concept indeed?
    It would be difficult to find the aesthetic characteristic of certain common in molding elements among these crafts if you recall the curve and elegant art crafts of Arts and Crafts Movement that the medieval art of West shall be the model and the simple and elegant crafts of Folk crafts that Yanagi pursued. Although Yanagi and Morris emphasized the importance of crafts equally, it is because the difference that their emotion grown in a different cultural background called the East and West respectively as well are exposed in their view of art and work definitely.
    This paper would reconsider the difference of the emotion of Westerns in Art and Crafts and the emotion of Asian in Folk crafts on the basis of the point that the view of point about artwork has no alternative but to be different naturally if the emotion is different like this. By doing so, it aims to provide the key seeking the new direction of crafts in our climate of crafts world getting a lot of control still in the viewpoint overlooking the crafts in modern Western eyes after the Japanese colonial era.
    It has been noted that whereas Yanagi responded to the tactual sense like the ceramic sensitively out of especially crafts field, Morris responded to the pictorial art of textile or wallpaper, etc. mainly by comparatively analyzing the difference concretely in the aesthetic sensibility of Yanagi and Morris with the representative crafts they made or collected.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 민주식, "한국 전통미학 사상의 구조" 한국미학예술학회 17 : 23-42, 2003

    2 여건종, "일상적 삶의 상징적 창조성--윌리엄 모리스와 유물론적 미학" 19세기영어권문학회 9 (9): 89-111, 2005

    3 고유섭, "우현 고유섭 전집 1" 열화당 2007

    4 신나경, "야나기 무네요시의 민예론에 있어서 미와 도덕" 한국미학예술학회 28 : 57-84, 2008

    5 신나경, "야나기 무네요시에 있어서 '사회주의'의 의미와 그 원천" 민족미학회 3 : 2005

    6 이향근, "시적 감성의 교육 내용 설계 연구" 한국교원대학교 대학원 2012

    7 이승, "감성의 철학" 민음사 1996

    8 草光俊雄, "近代日本とイギリス思想(杉原四郎編)" 日本経済評論社 123-142, 1995

    9 紀田順一郎, "芸術新潮" 新潮社 1999

    10 桑子敏雄, "空間の履歴" 東信堂 2009

    1 민주식, "한국 전통미학 사상의 구조" 한국미학예술학회 17 : 23-42, 2003

    2 여건종, "일상적 삶의 상징적 창조성--윌리엄 모리스와 유물론적 미학" 19세기영어권문학회 9 (9): 89-111, 2005

    3 고유섭, "우현 고유섭 전집 1" 열화당 2007

    4 신나경, "야나기 무네요시의 민예론에 있어서 미와 도덕" 한국미학예술학회 28 : 57-84, 2008

    5 신나경, "야나기 무네요시에 있어서 '사회주의'의 의미와 그 원천" 민족미학회 3 : 2005

    6 이향근, "시적 감성의 교육 내용 설계 연구" 한국교원대학교 대학원 2012

    7 이승, "감성의 철학" 민음사 1996

    8 草光俊雄, "近代日本とイギリス思想(杉原四郎編)" 日本経済評論社 123-142, 1995

    9 紀田順一郎, "芸術新潮" 新潮社 1999

    10 桑子敏雄, "空間の履歴" 東信堂 2009

    11 桑子敏雄, "空間と身体―新しい哲学への出発" 東信堂 1998

    12 大熊信行, "社會思想家としてのラスキンとモリス" 新潮社 1927

    13 柳宗悅, "柳宗悅全集 全二十二卷(計二十五冊)" 筑摩書房 1992

    14 佐々木 健一, "日本的感性―触覚とずらしの構造" 中公新書 2010

    15 池田元, "大正「社会」主義の思想" 論創社 1993

    16 小野二郎, "ユートピアの構想" 晶文社 1986

    17 大内秀明, "ウィリアム・モリスのマルクス主義 アーツ&クラフツ運動の源流" 平凡社 2012

    18 Morris, William, "William Morris: On Art and Socialism" Lehmann 1947

    19 Morris, William, "The Unpublished Lectures of William Morris" Wayne State University

    20 Morris, William, "Collected Works of William Morris" Longmans 1915

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.28 0.28 0.29
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.29 0.29 0.613 0.07
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼