RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    초등영어 읽기 지도를 위한 교사의 전문성 = The primary school teachers’ professionalism for reading instruction

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76466335

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This article investigates the content knowledge and beliefs of primary school teachers about reading instruction from the Shulman’s ‘pedagogical content knowledge’ view, and explores the realities of reading instruction in the classroom. For the purpose, questionnaires were used. The questions were consisted of three areas: items for in-class reading instruction, teacher’s belief on reading, and teacher’s content knowledge about reading. The data revealed that the primary school teachers have insufficient content knowledge for reading instruction, particularly in word analysis skills such as phonemic awareness, letter sound relationships, word frequency, and other topics related to reading. However, teachers’beliefs were different from their knowledge. Whereas their content knowledge about phonics, reading aloud, or story-based reading method is lower, they believe that those skills are effective for reading. It was also found that the realities of reading classroom were different from teachers’ beliefs. Although teachers believe that rich print environment facilitates the learners’ reading development, the print environments were little provided and they did not refer to print for their teaching. The result of analysis suggests that teacher training which focuses on reading instruction needs to be emphasized for effective reading instruction.
    번역하기

      This article investigates the content knowledge and beliefs of primary school teachers about reading instruction from the Shulman’s ‘pedagogical content knowledge’ view, and explores the realities of reading instruction in the classr...

      This article investigates the content knowledge and beliefs of primary school teachers about reading instruction from the Shulman’s ‘pedagogical content knowledge’ view, and explores the realities of reading instruction in the classroom. For the purpose, questionnaires were used. The questions were consisted of three areas: items for in-class reading instruction, teacher’s belief on reading, and teacher’s content knowledge about reading. The data revealed that the primary school teachers have insufficient content knowledge for reading instruction, particularly in word analysis skills such as phonemic awareness, letter sound relationships, word frequency, and other topics related to reading. However, teachers’beliefs were different from their knowledge. Whereas their content knowledge about phonics, reading aloud, or story-based reading method is lower, they believe that those skills are effective for reading. It was also found that the realities of reading classroom were different from teachers’ beliefs. Although teachers believe that rich print environment facilitates the learners’ reading development, the print environments were little provided and they did not refer to print for their teaching. The result of analysis suggests that teacher training which focuses on reading instruction needs to be emphasized for effective reading instruction.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론
      Ⅱ. 영어 지도와 교사의 전문성
      Ⅲ.연구 방법
      Ⅳ. 분석 결과 및 논의
      Ⅴ. 결론
      참고 문헌
      부록 - 설문지
    • Ⅰ. 서론
      Ⅱ. 영어 지도와 교사의 전문성
      Ⅲ.연구 방법
      Ⅳ. 분석 결과 및 논의
      Ⅴ. 결론
      참고 문헌
      부록 - 설문지
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "초등학교 영어과 교육과정에서 문자언어의 도입 시기에 관한 연구" 14 (14): 305-337, 1998

    2 "초등영어 읽기,쓰기 교육의 적정성 연구" 14 (14): 439-475, 2002

    3 "제7차 교육과정 초등영어 3,4학년 교재에 대한 학생들의 만족도 분석" 9 (9): 93-122, 2003

    4 "교육과정 및 교과서 읽기 내용 분석을 통한 초등영어 읽기 접근방법의 고찰" 12 (12): 167-190, 2005

    5 "script 쓰기를 통한 영어 발문 능력 신장 교사 연수 프로그램" 12 (12): 169-200, 2006

    6 "Words their way: Word study for phonics, vocabulary, & spelling instruction" Pearson. 2004

    7 "Tomorrow’s teacher of reading" Harvard University Press 1962

    8 "The teaching practices of effective teachers of literacy" 52 (52): 75-84, 2000

    9 "The knowledge of teaching: The K3P3 model. Reading Improvement" 97-107, 2004

    10 "Teaching teachers to teach reading: Paradigm shifts, persistent problems, and challenges" Erlbaum. 719-742, 2000

    1 "초등학교 영어과 교육과정에서 문자언어의 도입 시기에 관한 연구" 14 (14): 305-337, 1998

    2 "초등영어 읽기,쓰기 교육의 적정성 연구" 14 (14): 439-475, 2002

    3 "제7차 교육과정 초등영어 3,4학년 교재에 대한 학생들의 만족도 분석" 9 (9): 93-122, 2003

    4 "교육과정 및 교과서 읽기 내용 분석을 통한 초등영어 읽기 접근방법의 고찰" 12 (12): 167-190, 2005

    5 "script 쓰기를 통한 영어 발문 능력 신장 교사 연수 프로그램" 12 (12): 169-200, 2006

    6 "Words their way: Word study for phonics, vocabulary, & spelling instruction" Pearson. 2004

    7 "Tomorrow’s teacher of reading" Harvard University Press 1962

    8 "The teaching practices of effective teachers of literacy" 52 (52): 75-84, 2000

    9 "The knowledge of teaching: The K3P3 model. Reading Improvement" 97-107, 2004

    10 "Teaching teachers to teach reading: Paradigm shifts, persistent problems, and challenges" Erlbaum. 719-742, 2000

    11 "Teaching literacy effectively in the primary school." RoutledgePalmer. 2002

    12 "Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction" 2000

    13 "Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence." 8 (8): 2000

    14 "Stages of reading development" McGraw-Hill 1983

    15 "Research on teacher thinking" 279-304, 1977

    16 "Reading teacher education in the next millennium: What your grandmother’s teacher didn’t know that your granddaughter’s teacher should" 35 (35): 28-44, 2000

    17 "Preventing reading difficulties in young children." National Academy Press 1998

    18 "Phonics from A to Z." Scholastic Professional Books 1998

    19 "Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and inservice educators about early reading instruction." 51 : 97-120, 2001

    20 "National Commission on Excellence in Elementary Teacher Preparation for Reading Instruction" 105 (105): 267-287, 2005

    21 "National Board for Professional Teaching Standards" Author. 2001

    22 "Management strategies in elementary school classrooms The University of Texas at Austin Research and Development Center for Teacher Education" 1982

    23 "Learning to teach reading: The status of the knowledge base" International Reading Association. 4-19, 2001

    24 "Language enrichment teacher preparation and practice predicts third grade reading comprehension." 26 : 401-432, 2005

    25 "Knowledge growth in teaching" 4-14, 1986

    26 "Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics" Ablex. 83-104, 2000

    27 "Informed instruction for reading success: Foundations for teacher preparation." 1997

    28 "Foundation of the new reform" k (k): 1-22, 1987

    29 "English L2 reading: Getting to the bottom" Lawerence Erlbaum Associates. 2002

    30 "Effects of an extensive program of stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children" 263-284, 1988

    31 "Disciplinary knowledge of K-3 teachers and their knowledge calibration in the domain of early literacy" 54 (54): 139-197, 2004

    32 "Developing measures of content knowledge for teaching reading" 105 : 31-48, 2004

    33 "Defining phonological awareness and its relationship to early reading Journal of Educational Psychology" 221-234, 1994

    34 "Beginning to read Thinking and learning about print" MIT Press 1990

    35 "150 different ways of knowing Representations of knowledge in teaching" 104-123, 1987

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.74 0.74 0.74
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.76 0.74 1.149 0.11
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼