RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      농촌지역 고등학생들의 성별 및 계열별 자아정체감의 차이 = (A) study on the differences of ego identies in the high school student's in agricultural area by their major and sex

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T9844256

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study intends to examine the formation of high school students' ego-identity, and helps them to establish positive ego-identity. Accordingly, this study is focused on offering more meaningful source for the guidance of high school students by analyzing high school students' ego-identity.
      This study can be concluded as follows :
      First, there was a significant difference about ego-identity between academic high school students and technical high school students. In the six sub-items, self-subjectivity, self-acceptance, a firm belief of future, goal-directness, intimity, self-assertiveness, the academic high school students were higher than the technical high school students. That is, the academic high school students remain higher in the change of inner consciousness.
      Second, there is no significant difference about ego-identity between male and female high school students. In sub-items, self-subjectivity, self-acceptance, a firm belief of future, there is no significant difference between male and female students.
      Interpreting and discussing the analyzed results by means of findings of theoretical backgrounds and precedent studies.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study intends to examine the formation of high school students' ego-identity, and helps them to establish positive ego-identity. Accordingly, this study is focused on offering more meaningful source for the guidance of high school ...

      The purpose of this study intends to examine the formation of high school students' ego-identity, and helps them to establish positive ego-identity. Accordingly, this study is focused on offering more meaningful source for the guidance of high school students by analyzing high school students' ego-identity.
      This study can be concluded as follows :
      First, there was a significant difference about ego-identity between academic high school students and technical high school students. In the six sub-items, self-subjectivity, self-acceptance, a firm belief of future, goal-directness, intimity, self-assertiveness, the academic high school students were higher than the technical high school students. That is, the academic high school students remain higher in the change of inner consciousness.
      Second, there is no significant difference about ego-identity between male and female high school students. In sub-items, self-subjectivity, self-acceptance, a firm belief of future, there is no significant difference between male and female students.
      Interpreting and discussing the analyzed results by means of findings of theoretical backgrounds and precedent studies.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차 = ⅴ
      • Abstract = ⅶ
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 목적 및 문제 = 3
      • 목차 = ⅴ
      • Abstract = ⅶ
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 목적 및 문제 = 3
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 4
      • 1. 자아정체감의 의미 = 4
      • 2. 자아정체감의 발달 = 7
      • 가. 자아 정체감 발달에 관한 이론 = 7
      • 1) Erikson의 8단계 심리 사회적 발달론 = 7
      • 2) Marcia의 자아정체감 수준의 분류 = 10
      • 나. 자아정체감 발달의 관련 요인과 정체감 위기의 극복 = 11
      • 1) 자아정체감 발달에 영향을 주는 요인 = 11
      • 2) 정체감 위기의 극복 = 13
      • 3. 선행연구의 고찰 = 14
      • 가. 자아정체감 발달의 제요인 = 14
      • 나. 자아정체감과 제 요소와의 상관관계 = 15
      • Ⅲ. 연구의 방법 및 절차 = 17
      • 1. 연구 대상 = 17
      • 2. 측정 도구 = 18
      • 3. 자료 분석 = 21
      • 4. 연구의 제한점 = 21
      • Ⅳ. 연구결과 및 논의 = 22
      • 1. 결과 = 22
      • 2. 논의 = 38
      • Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론 = 41
      • 1. 요약 = 41
      • 2. 결론 = 44
      • 참고문헌 = 45
      • 부록 = 49
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼