RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    지방교육자치에 대한 정책논증 - 교육위원회 운영과 교육감 직선제 개선의 정당성 - = Policy Arguments about Act on Local Educational Autonomy: A reformative orientation

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A5076776

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This article critically examines to find the appropriate policy for local educational autonomy system. In detail, the article searches to guide the reformative orientation of the two current policies in focus of constitution of local educational board and election system of superintendent. It is argued that while changed in public service system and subject of educational administration, the authority and accountability should coincide with transformation of the related acts. As a result, the act obtains the legitimacy of power shift. However, recent examples of local educational autonomy system change deepen the conflict between the educative people and the administrative people. To solve the conflict, this article analyzes the following criteria in the perspective of policy argument method: educational perspective vs. economic perspective, education related control vs. public control, independence of educational administration, and professional management in education. The results of the policy arguments showed the followings. First, in the perspective of local autonomy system, eligibility for election of local educational board member and superintendent may be restricted within direct educational stakeholder. Second, the board member`s status may be strengthened in the focus of educational professionalism and political impartiality. Third, the superintendent`s duty should be clearly classified in the educational perspective. And the superintendent`s status about ambiguous act on local autonomy (Article 112) should be fixed in the educational professionalism. Finally, educational effectiveness should be fundamentally considered in the educational perspective.
    번역하기

    This article critically examines to find the appropriate policy for local educational autonomy system. In detail, the article searches to guide the reformative orientation of the two current policies in focus of constitution of local educational board...

    This article critically examines to find the appropriate policy for local educational autonomy system. In detail, the article searches to guide the reformative orientation of the two current policies in focus of constitution of local educational board and election system of superintendent. It is argued that while changed in public service system and subject of educational administration, the authority and accountability should coincide with transformation of the related acts. As a result, the act obtains the legitimacy of power shift. However, recent examples of local educational autonomy system change deepen the conflict between the educative people and the administrative people. To solve the conflict, this article analyzes the following criteria in the perspective of policy argument method: educational perspective vs. economic perspective, education related control vs. public control, independence of educational administration, and professional management in education. The results of the policy arguments showed the followings. First, in the perspective of local autonomy system, eligibility for election of local educational board member and superintendent may be restricted within direct educational stakeholder. Second, the board member`s status may be strengthened in the focus of educational professionalism and political impartiality. Third, the superintendent`s duty should be clearly classified in the educational perspective. And the superintendent`s status about ambiguous act on local autonomy (Article 112) should be fixed in the educational professionalism. Finally, educational effectiveness should be fundamentally considered in the educational perspective.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼