RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    淸末 駐漢城 商務公署와 華商組織 = The Office for Chinese Commercial Affairs in Hanseong and Overseas Chinese Organizations in the Late Qing Dynasty

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103684823

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Overseas Chinese in Korea originated from Chinese merchants at the end of the Qing Dynasty. As each Chinese merchant had to be a member of a group in order to run their business in Korea, the guilds in Seoul naturally became the center of this overseas Chinese society. In this way, Chinese merchants in the early Chinese society in Korea formed their groups centering on specific localities, and the structure divided into groups was a remarkable phenomenon. However, while complying with the goals of the organization of the Chinese Guild, the Chinese merchants wanted to form their own groups with culturally homogeneous members, separate the organization, and promote the group’s common goals. This is also probably the reason that they were grouped by locality according to the traditional principle of organization.
    As the guild was established for pursuing common goals, namely,the development and unity of the Chinese merchant association, it was the first private office launched mainly by Chinese merchants. Chinese merchants opened a center for discussing public affairs and recommended the representative of the guild. In addition, they collected 0.4% dues from the members’ trades and used it for the operation of the guild. Even boatmen agreed on the “Regulations on the Guild” stipulated by Chinese merchants for raising funds for the guild’s operation. This suggests that there were motives for voluntary participation. However,the selection of director, the representative of the guild, was initiated by the role of supervising the ground-leveling work for the Incheon settlement, and the official seal was paid for by the Commercial Affairs Office. Furthermore, half of the money for buying the guild building was borrowed by General Commissioner Chen Shutang from official funds. Considering these facts, the guild was launched not as a completely private organization but as “a semi-governmental”institution.
    Differing from pre-modern overseas Chinese who were irrelevant to state power, modern overseas Chinese grew in close connection with state power. Chinese merchants in Seoul were managed strategically by their homeland from the early period of overseas Chinese social organizations. On the other hand, Chinese merchants used state power by complying with the state’s political strategies actively. This provided a base for Chinese merchants to grow and surpassed Korean and Japanese merchants in Seoul where competition among Korea, Japan,and China was most fierce.
    번역하기

    Overseas Chinese in Korea originated from Chinese merchants at the end of the Qing Dynasty. As each Chinese merchant had to be a member of a group in order to run their business in Korea, the guilds in Seoul naturally became the center of this oversea...

    Overseas Chinese in Korea originated from Chinese merchants at the end of the Qing Dynasty. As each Chinese merchant had to be a member of a group in order to run their business in Korea, the guilds in Seoul naturally became the center of this overseas Chinese society. In this way, Chinese merchants in the early Chinese society in Korea formed their groups centering on specific localities, and the structure divided into groups was a remarkable phenomenon. However, while complying with the goals of the organization of the Chinese Guild, the Chinese merchants wanted to form their own groups with culturally homogeneous members, separate the organization, and promote the group’s common goals. This is also probably the reason that they were grouped by locality according to the traditional principle of organization.
    As the guild was established for pursuing common goals, namely,the development and unity of the Chinese merchant association, it was the first private office launched mainly by Chinese merchants. Chinese merchants opened a center for discussing public affairs and recommended the representative of the guild. In addition, they collected 0.4% dues from the members’ trades and used it for the operation of the guild. Even boatmen agreed on the “Regulations on the Guild” stipulated by Chinese merchants for raising funds for the guild’s operation. This suggests that there were motives for voluntary participation. However,the selection of director, the representative of the guild, was initiated by the role of supervising the ground-leveling work for the Incheon settlement, and the official seal was paid for by the Commercial Affairs Office. Furthermore, half of the money for buying the guild building was borrowed by General Commissioner Chen Shutang from official funds. Considering these facts, the guild was launched not as a completely private organization but as “a semi-governmental”institution.
    Differing from pre-modern overseas Chinese who were irrelevant to state power, modern overseas Chinese grew in close connection with state power. Chinese merchants in Seoul were managed strategically by their homeland from the early period of overseas Chinese social organizations. On the other hand, Chinese merchants used state power by complying with the state’s political strategies actively. This provided a base for Chinese merchants to grow and surpassed Korean and Japanese merchants in Seoul where competition among Korea, Japan,and China was most fierce.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 譚建平, "재한화교의 사단조직에 대한 연구: 서울지역을 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 1985

    2 강진아, "근대전환기 한국화상의 대중국 무역의 운영방식― 『同順泰寶號記』의 분석을 중심으로 ―" 동양사학회 (105) : 205-251, 2008

    3 김건우, "근대공문서의 탄생" 소와당 2008

    4 김희신, "근대 한중관계의 변화와 외교당안의 생성 ― 「淸季駐韓使館保存檔」을 중심으로 ―" 중국근현대사학회 (50) : 35-73, 2011

    5 이옥련, "근대 한국 화교사회의 형성과 전개" 인하대학교 2005

    6 강진아, "근대 동아시아의 초국적 자본의 성장과 한계-재한화교기업 同順泰(1874?~1937)의 사례, In 근대전환기 동아시아 삼국과 한국-근대인식과 정책" 성균관대학교출판부 2006

    7 김희신, "駐朝鮮使館의 화교 실태조사와 관리 ― 청일전쟁 이전 漢城ㆍ仁川을 중심으로 ―" 명청사학회 (34) : 205-236, 2010

    8 崔承現, "韓國華僑史硏究-從上國國民到多層認定" 北京大學 2000

    9 孫禎睦, "韓國 開港期 都市變化過程硏究-開港場·開市場·租界·居留地" 一志社 1994

    10 石川亮太, "開港期漢城における朝鮮人·中國人間の商取引と紛爭-『駐韓使館檔案』を通じて" 10 : 2007

    1 譚建平, "재한화교의 사단조직에 대한 연구: 서울지역을 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 1985

    2 강진아, "근대전환기 한국화상의 대중국 무역의 운영방식― 『同順泰寶號記』의 분석을 중심으로 ―" 동양사학회 (105) : 205-251, 2008

    3 김건우, "근대공문서의 탄생" 소와당 2008

    4 김희신, "근대 한중관계의 변화와 외교당안의 생성 ― 「淸季駐韓使館保存檔」을 중심으로 ―" 중국근현대사학회 (50) : 35-73, 2011

    5 이옥련, "근대 한국 화교사회의 형성과 전개" 인하대학교 2005

    6 강진아, "근대 동아시아의 초국적 자본의 성장과 한계-재한화교기업 同順泰(1874?~1937)의 사례, In 근대전환기 동아시아 삼국과 한국-근대인식과 정책" 성균관대학교출판부 2006

    7 김희신, "駐朝鮮使館의 화교 실태조사와 관리 ― 청일전쟁 이전 漢城ㆍ仁川을 중심으로 ―" 명청사학회 (34) : 205-236, 2010

    8 崔承現, "韓國華僑史硏究-從上國國民到多層認定" 北京大學 2000

    9 孫禎睦, "韓國 開港期 都市變化過程硏究-開港場·開市場·租界·居留地" 一志社 1994

    10 石川亮太, "開港期漢城における朝鮮人·中國人間の商取引と紛爭-『駐韓使館檔案』を通じて" 10 : 2007

    11 石川亮太, "開港後朝鮮における華商の貿易活動-1894年の淸國米中繼貿易を通じて, In 中國近代化の動態構造" 京都大學人文科學硏究所 2004

    12 김희신, "淸末(1882-1894년) 漢城 華商組織과 그 位相" 중국근현대사학회 (46) : 53-80, 2010

    13 臺灣中央硏究院近代史硏究所所藏, "淸季駐韓使館檔: 陳樹棠, 袁世凱, 唐紹儀 宗"

    14 中央硏究院近代史硏究所, "淸季中日韓關係史料" 中央硏究院近代史硏究所 3-5, 1972

    15 石川亮太, "朝鮮開港後における華商の對上海貿易-同順泰資料を通じて" 63 (63): 2005

    16 楊昭全, "朝鮮華僑史" 中國華僑出版公司 1991

    17 강진아, "廣東네트워크(Canton-Networks)와 朝鮮華商 同順泰" 한국사학회 88 (88): 775-820, 2007

    18 石川亮太, "ソウル大學所藏『同泰來信』の性格と成立科程-近代朝鮮華僑硏究の端緖として" 32 : 2004

    19 김희신, "‘漢城 開設行棧 조항 개정’ 교섭과 중국의 대응" 동양사학회 (113) : 199-244, 2010

    20 石川亮太, "19世紀末東アジアにおける國際流通構造と朝鮮-海産物の生産·流通から" 109 (109): 2000

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.18 1.18 1.19
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.06 0.98 2.155 0.1
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼