근대전환기 일본 ‘국민’의 동아시아 인식 - 1870년대 건백서를 중심으로 - = How the Japanese “People” Perceived East Asia during the Transition Period to Modern Era - Focusing on the Petitions Submitted in the 1870s -

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this paper, the traditional East Asian region “Chaekbong-Chogong(冊封·朝貢) relation” and new “Treaty relations” was filed in 1870 to begin to coexist Kenpakusyo(建白書) be a turning point in modern Japanese “people” in East Asia and how By analyzing what was recognized.
First, the formative period of modern Japanese national system that has characterized Kenpakusyo are as follows.
One, Kenpakusyo is, “kougiyoron(公議與論)” as one of the new government declared in his justification, was an institutional apparatus was provided to prove this.
Two, Kenpakusyo is, Sain(左院) policy for the various “people” was to promote active political participation. In this process Kenpakusyo is an active “citizen” show me the birth, from below, “patriotic” now represent a device. As a result, Kenpakusyo from the government’s position, “national” from the standpoint of “public vote” was popular until 1875, while acting as a powerful tool.
Three, but instead placed on Sain instead of Genrouin(元老院) petition and related documents will result in 1876 enacted a provision that will be accepted until the movement spread nationwide in 1880 Congress established the petition was submitted less Kenpakusyo.
To around the year 1875 as the “people” are working actively participate in state affairs, according to this kenpankusyo period was submitted to positively, Seikanron-seihen (征韓論政變) of 1873, Taiwan expedition of 1874, Kanghwa Island incident of 1875 While continuing to occur, but was upset when the internal order in East Asia began.
The year Taiwan expedition of 1874, Kanghwa Island incident of 1875 of the year presented their opinions on “the people” written specifically for the analysis of the petition, here is a “Nihongatakaitituzyo (日本型華夷秩序).” based on the recognition and East Asia,“Chaekbong-Chogong relation.” Turn of the traits had recognized the coexistence of modern East Asia based on international law to justify the establishment of a modern concept to resolve the territory.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김민규, "조규? 조약!" 역사문제연구소 (75) : 273-279, 2006

2 박삼헌, "명치초년에 있어서 地方官會議의 성격" 25 : 2004

3 박삼헌, "메이지초년 태정관문서의 역사적 성격 in 독도·울릉도 연구-역사·고고·지리학적 고찰" 동북아역사재단 2010

4 권혁수, "근대 한중관계사의 재조명" 혜안 2007

5 김민규, "근대 동아시아 국제질서의 변용과 조선-‘조규체제’의 성립과 와해 in 한국사의 국제환경과 민족문화" 경인문화사 2002

6 金旼奎, "近代 東아시아 國際秩序의 變容과 淸日修好條規(1871年) ― '條規體制'의 生成" 대동문화연구원 41 : 321-356, 2002

7 松田道之, "琉球處分 上卷, 橫山學 責任編集 in 琉球所屬問題關係資料 第6卷 琉球處分 上·中" 本邦書籍 1980

8 川島眞, "東アジア國際政治史" 名古屋大學出版會 2007

9 色川大吉, "明治建白書集成 第四卷" 筑摩書房 1988

10 色川大吉, "明治建白書集成 第六卷" 筑摩書房 1987

11 色川大吉, "明治建白書集成 第五卷" 筑摩書房 1996

12 色川大吉, "明治建白書集成 第二卷" 筑摩書房 1990

13 色川大吉, "明治建白書集成 第三卷" 筑摩書房 1986

14 色川大吉, "明治建白書集成 第一卷" 筑摩書房 2000

15 石井孝, "明治初期の日本と東アジア" 有隣堂 1983

16 牧原憲夫, "明治七年の大論爭-建白書から見た近代國家と民衆" 日本經濟評論社 1990

17 芝原拓自, "日本近代思想大系12 對外觀" 岩波書店 1988

18 紙屋敦之, "日本史リブレット43 琉球と日本·中國" 山川出版社 2003

19 和田春樹, "岩波講座 東アジア近現代通史1 東アジア世界の近代" 岩波書店 2010

20 三谷博, "大人のための近現代史 19世紀編" 東京大學出版會 2009

21 柴田和夫, "國立公文書館所藏明治初期建白書について" (2) : 1974

22 池田敏, "二. 日本型華夷意識 in 日本の對外關係6 近世的世界の成熟" 吉川弘文館 2010

23 吉澤誠一郞, "シリーズ中國近現代史① 淸朝と近代世界 19世紀" 岩波新書 2010

24 박삼헌, "1874년 지방관회의 준비와 左院의 역할" 한국일본학회 0 (0): 481-492, 2006