(제Ⅰ장)

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104471608
2006
-
KCI등재
학술저널
223-243(21쪽)
5
0
상세조회0
다운로드참고문헌 (Reference)
1 "정부투자기관의 BSCⅢ: 성과주의 예산제도와 BSC의 결합" 34 : 28-52, 2001
2 "정부투자기관 경영평가편람" 기획예산처 2001
3 "정부투자기관 경영평가보고서" 기획예산처 2000
4 "Why does Business Need a Balanced Scorecard?" 5-10, June1997
5 "Why Balanced Scorecard Fail" 6-11, 1999.1.
6 "Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Manage- ment System" 75-86, 1996b
7 "Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Manage- ment:PartⅡ" 15 (15): 147-160, 2001b.6.
8 "Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Manage- ment:PartⅠ" 15 (15): 87-104, 2001a.3.
9 "Total Quality Management and the Choice of Information and Reward Systems" 33 : 1-34, 1995
10 "The performance measurement of government investment organizations a aim of this research is to show implications of positive verification of a horizontal and vertical balance In the results of this research management appraisal system of government investment institutions does not represent that vertical balance among three perspectives Therefore measurement system should be controled and organized by strategic performance Indicator"
1 "정부투자기관의 BSCⅢ: 성과주의 예산제도와 BSC의 결합" 34 : 28-52, 2001
2 "정부투자기관 경영평가편람" 기획예산처 2001
3 "정부투자기관 경영평가보고서" 기획예산처 2000
4 "Why does Business Need a Balanced Scorecard?" 5-10, June1997
5 "Why Balanced Scorecard Fail" 6-11, 1999.1.
6 "Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Manage- ment System" 75-86, 1996b
7 "Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Manage- ment:PartⅡ" 15 (15): 147-160, 2001b.6.
8 "Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Manage- ment:PartⅠ" 15 (15): 87-104, 2001a.3.
9 "Total Quality Management and the Choice of Information and Reward Systems" 33 : 1-34, 1995
10 "The performance measurement of government investment organizations a aim of this research is to show implications of positive verification of a horizontal and vertical balance In the results of this research management appraisal system of government investment institutions does not represent that vertical balance among three perspectives Therefore measurement system should be controled and organized by strategic performance Indicator"
11 "The Balanced Sco- recard" Harvard Business School Press 1996a
12 "Quality Strategy. Strategic Control Systems, and Or- ganizational Performance, Accounting" 22 : 293-314, 1997
13 "Performance Drivers" John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Parker, C. 49 (49): 62-66, 2000
14 "Measures That Drive Performance" 1992
15 "Linking the Balanced Scorecard to Strategy" 39 (39): 53-57, 1996c
16 "Innovations in Per- formance Measurement" 10 : 205-238, 1998a
17 "Bal- anced Scorecard:A Rising Trend in Strategic Performance Measuerment" 5 (5): 41-51, 2001
18 "BSC개념에 의한 정부투자기관 경영평가지표간의 인과관계" 12 (12): 133-162, 2003
19 "Are Non-Financial Measures Leading Indicators of Financial Performance An Analysis of Customer Satisfaction" 36 : 1-35, 1998b
20 "An Empirical Investigation of an Incentive Plan that Includes Nonfinancial Performance Measures" 65-92, 2000.1.
21 "An Empirical Analysis on the Balance of Management Appraisal Indicator System in Governmental Investment Institution"
한국과 미국 기업의 이사회제도 차이가 기업재무보고 행태에 미치는 영향에 대한 실증적 비교 연구-사외이사와 감사위원회를 중심으로-
사외이사의 특성과 감사품질이 이익조정과 KIS 신용평점과의 관련성에 미치는 영향
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2021-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2018-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2015-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2005-08-25 | 학회명변경 | 영문명 : Korea Accounting Information Associon -> Korea Accounting Information Association | ![]() |
| 2005-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.96 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 1.15 | 1.25 | 1.443 | 0.23 |