칼뱅의 자연과 생태 사상 = Ecological Thought of Calvin

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

??This paper aims to examine closely the ecological thought of Calvin, through his enormous writings, per example, Institution, Commentary and Predication etc.<br/>
??Even though, Calvin's ecological thought has limitations, yet some of the following reasons tell us that it is valuable in many ways today.<br/>
??First, Calvin's thought insists that Men are essentially equal with the others creatures because all were created from the same origin, which is earth. Men and Nature are not separated. They do not have any conflict. Men cultivate land not for the purpose of the income or goods, but of the pleasure of the activity it -self, So men's relation with the creatures is of being it-self not of having.<br/>
??Second, Calvin's thought don't receive literally the text of Gn 1;28 'conquer the earth ... rule over all of the creature ... '. The thought interprets it in the very convivial and favorable perspective. He adopts the 'nurture' instead of 'conquest' or 'government' etc., in order to emphasize the thoughtful and careful relation between Men and other creatures. In that manner, he reminds Men's responsibility to nature. <br/>
??Third, likewise, Men's right of using nature is interpreted in the same manner. Though Calvin's thought accepts that Men have the right to use the goods of nature or the nature it-self, the right is neither unlimited nor unconditioned. His thought always calls for restrain and limit, and underlines the frugal usage of the goods, this is because nature is offered only for the survival and life to men.<br/>
??Fourth and last, Calvin's thoughtmaintains that the troublemaker is not nature but man. The created world is destructed by Men due to sin and corruption. In relation to the nature, Calvin's thought regards the avarice as cause of sin. Therefore it is man who have to bring essential changes. According to his thought, men have to improve the love relationship between themselves and nature, by riding themselves out of avarice and greed.<br/>
??In general, there is a tendency that the responsibility of destruction of nature is shifted on the occidental civilization and the christianism. At least in the thought of Calvin, we can not find any relation between the contemporary ecological problem and the christianism. If there is certain relation, that is of the opposite manner against the destructive civilization, in the supposition that the christianism is faithful to his teaching.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

??This paper aims to examine closely the ecological thought of Calvin, through his enormous writings, per example, Institution, Commentary and Predication etc.<br/>
??Even though, Calvin's ecological thought has limitations, yet some of the following reasons tell us that it is valuable in many ways today.<br/>
??First, Calvin's thought insists that Men are essentially equal with the others creatures because all were created from the same origin, which is earth. Men and Nature are not separated. They do not have any conflict. Men cultivate land not for the purpose of the income or goods, but of the pleasure of the activity it -self, So men's relation with the creatures is of being it-self not of having.<br/>
??Second, Calvin's thought don't receive literally the text of Gn 1;28 'conquer the earth ... rule over all of the creature ... '. The thought interprets it in the very convivial and favorable perspective. He adopts the 'nurture' instead of 'conquest' or 'government' etc., in order to emphasize the thoughtful and careful relation between Men and other creatures. In that manner, he reminds Men's responsibility to nature. <br/>
??Third, likewise, Men's right of using nature is interpreted in the same manner. Though Calvin's thought accepts that Men have the right to use the goods of nature or the nature it-self, the right is neither unlimited nor unconditioned. His thought always calls for restrain and limit, and underlines the frugal usage of the goods, this is because nature is offered only for the survival and life to men.<br/>
??Fourth and last, Calvin's thoughtmaintains that the troublemaker is not nature but man. The created world is destructed by Men due to sin and corruption. In relation to the nature, Calvin's thought regards the avarice as cause of sin. Therefore it is man who have to bring essential changes. According to his thought, men have to improve the love relationship between themselves and nature, by riding themselves out of avarice and greed.<br/>
??In general, there is a tendency that the responsibility of destruction of nature is shifted on the occidental civilization and the christianism. At least in the thought of Calvin, we can not find any relation between the contemporary ecological problem and the christianism. If there is certain relation, that is of the opposite manner against the destructive civilization, in the supposition that the christianism is faithful to his teaching.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 칼뱅의 자연에 대한 사랑과 이해
• Ⅱ. 칼뱅의 생태사상은 인간중심적인가?
• Ⅲ. 인간이 자연과 맺는 관계와 청빈한 삶
• Ⅳ. 자연과 생태계는 어떻게 회복될 수 있을까?
• Ⅴ. 칼뱅 생태 사상의 현대적 의의
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이오갑, "칼빈의 하나님의 형상론" 3 : 1998

2 이오갑, "칼빈의 창조론" 4 : 2007

3 이오갑, "칼빈의 자연사상" 4 : 1993

4 월레스, 로날드 S., "칼빈의 기독교 생활 원리" 기독교문서선교회 1996

5 이오갑, "칼빈의 계시론" 41 (41): 2006

6 이오갑, "칼뱅의 신과 세계" 대한기독교서회 2010

7 골먼, 대니얼, "에코 지능" 웅진지식하우스 2010

8 Calvin J., "Supplementa Calviniana" Neukirchen-Vluyn 1936

9 Calvin J., "Petit traité de la Sainte Cène. in: La vraie pieté" Labor et Fides 1986

10 Perrot A., "Le visage humain de Jean Calvin" Labor et Fides 1986

11 Calvin J., "Ioannis Calvini Opera quae Supersunt Omnia" Brunsvigae. Apud c. A. Schwetschke et Filium 1863

12 Calvin J., "Institution de la religion chrétienne" Labor et Fides 1955

13 Calvin J., "Epître à tous amateurs de Jésus-Christ et son Evangile. in: Genève" Labor et Fides 1986

14 Calvin J., "Commentaires sur le Nouveau Testament 4 volumes" Société des Livres Religieux 1892

15 Calvin J., "Commentaires Bibliques. in; Genèse" Labor et Fides 1961

16 Calvin J., "Commentaires Bibliques. in: Romains" Labor et Fides 1968

17 Calvin J., "Commentaires Bibliques. in: Jean" Labor et Fides 1968

18 Torrance T. F., "Calvin’s Doctrine of man" Lutterworth Press 1952

19 Marcel P., "Calvin et Copernic, la légende ou les faits?" La Revue Réfomée 1980