RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      사민주의와 기민주의의 이념적 대립과 현실적 융합에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Nature of the Neo Social Democratism in Europe: Focusing on the Relationship with Christ Democracy

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102137472

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In Europe, both social democratic party and christ democratic party had tried to differentiate its own party from the other in order to develop its own unique political ideology. This differentiation resulted in a conflict relationship between two parties and each party employed different policies based on its own political ideology. However, each party showed a tendency to accommodate the counterpart party’s political ideology and policy when there were dramatic political, economic, and social changes. During the late 60’s and early 70’s in which there were a rapid economic growth and the expansion of welfare state, christ democratic party became “Social Democratization” and christ democratic party accepted the concept of employment & distribution and the principles of social security. On the contrary, social democratic party which became a ruling party since late 90’s tried to become “Christ Democratization” in order to increase the nation’s competitiveness in an effort to cope with the collapse of Eastern Europe and globalization. For this reason, social democratic party accommodated policies such as the reduction of social welfare expenditure, and minimization of governmental intervention into economic issues in order to increase the flexibility of labor market and economic revitalization. At the same time, the social democratic party is taking “the third road” to maintain the characteristics of equality principle as a welfare state by sustaining the principles of full employment and redistribution of wealth which is important for the dispersion of social risk. This trends is a sign of modernization in welfare system which aims at heightening of nation’s competitiveness in terms of economic perspective and promoting high quality welfare state in terms of social perspective.
      번역하기

      In Europe, both social democratic party and christ democratic party had tried to differentiate its own party from the other in order to develop its own unique political ideology. This differentiation resulted in a conflict relationship between two par...

      In Europe, both social democratic party and christ democratic party had tried to differentiate its own party from the other in order to develop its own unique political ideology. This differentiation resulted in a conflict relationship between two parties and each party employed different policies based on its own political ideology. However, each party showed a tendency to accommodate the counterpart party’s political ideology and policy when there were dramatic political, economic, and social changes. During the late 60’s and early 70’s in which there were a rapid economic growth and the expansion of welfare state, christ democratic party became “Social Democratization” and christ democratic party accepted the concept of employment & distribution and the principles of social security. On the contrary, social democratic party which became a ruling party since late 90’s tried to become “Christ Democratization” in order to increase the nation’s competitiveness in an effort to cope with the collapse of Eastern Europe and globalization. For this reason, social democratic party accommodated policies such as the reduction of social welfare expenditure, and minimization of governmental intervention into economic issues in order to increase the flexibility of labor market and economic revitalization. At the same time, the social democratic party is taking “the third road” to maintain the characteristics of equality principle as a welfare state by sustaining the principles of full employment and redistribution of wealth which is important for the dispersion of social risk. This trends is a sign of modernization in welfare system which aims at heightening of nation’s competitiveness in terms of economic perspective and promoting high quality welfare state in terms of social perspective.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 심성지, "폴더모델(Polder Model):복지국가의 합의적 개혁?" 분쟁해결연구센터 9 (9): 77-111, 2011

      2 김현수, "제3의 길과 포스트대처리즘 : 서유럽이 갈 길인가" 한국인문사회과학회 26 (26): 60-78, 2002

      3 권영달, "유럽 사회민주주의의 이념과 역사" 24 : 167-187, 1993

      4 심성지, "외국저축계정제도연구" 공무원연금연구센터 2007

      5 양창삼, "신자유주의 문제와 새로운 파라다임의 창출" 13 : 1-14, 2001

      6 신광영, "스웨덴 사회민주주의와 경제정책" 4 : 260-288, 1990

      7 조기제, "스웨덴 사회민주주의: 임금 소득자 기금을 중심으로" 2 (2): 51-74, 1993

      8 신광영, "스웨덴 계급타협의 형성과 위기" 34 : 897-927, 2000

      9 정범구, "수정주의, 개량주의, 사회민주주의: 사회민주당에 대한 Bernstein의 관점을 중심으로" 25 (25): 387-405, 1991

      10 김승현, "선진자본주의 사회에서의 복지정책의 변화: 사회민주주의와 신보수주의의 영향" 27 (27): 1263-1280, 1993

      1 심성지, "폴더모델(Polder Model):복지국가의 합의적 개혁?" 분쟁해결연구센터 9 (9): 77-111, 2011

      2 김현수, "제3의 길과 포스트대처리즘 : 서유럽이 갈 길인가" 한국인문사회과학회 26 (26): 60-78, 2002

      3 권영달, "유럽 사회민주주의의 이념과 역사" 24 : 167-187, 1993

      4 심성지, "외국저축계정제도연구" 공무원연금연구센터 2007

      5 양창삼, "신자유주의 문제와 새로운 파라다임의 창출" 13 : 1-14, 2001

      6 신광영, "스웨덴 사회민주주의와 경제정책" 4 : 260-288, 1990

      7 조기제, "스웨덴 사회민주주의: 임금 소득자 기금을 중심으로" 2 (2): 51-74, 1993

      8 신광영, "스웨덴 계급타협의 형성과 위기" 34 : 897-927, 2000

      9 정범구, "수정주의, 개량주의, 사회민주주의: 사회민주당에 대한 Bernstein의 관점을 중심으로" 25 (25): 387-405, 1991

      10 김승현, "선진자본주의 사회에서의 복지정책의 변화: 사회민주주의와 신보수주의의 영향" 27 (27): 1263-1280, 1993

      11 황준성, "서유럽 사회민주주의의 현황과 전망: 스웨덴을 중심으로" 5 : 449-486, 1997

      12 황신준, "사회적 시장경제, 질서 자유주의, 사회민주주의: 독일의 경제질서 이 념과 현실체제를 둘러싼 혼동" 1 : 145-165, 2000

      13 황병덕, "사회민주주의의 위기와 신자유주의의 세계화" 21 : 245-270, 1995

      14 Albers, D, "사회민주주의와 정치공간 유럽: 새로운 강령논의의 불 가피성" 노동사회 77-87, 2000

      15 김영순, "사회민주주의와 신자유주의 사이에서: 제3의길 이후의 스웨덴복지국가" 29 (29): 103-124, 1995

      16 문진영, "사회민주주의와 복지국가: 영국을 중심으로" 32 : 1996

      17 고세훈, "사회민주주의: 논리, 전개, 전망" 8 : 140-186, 1992

      18 Bless, Peter, "Zum Wandel wohlfahrtsstaatlicher Sicherung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Zwischen Lohnameit und Familie" 28 (28): 114-135, 1999

      19 Mahon, Rianne, "Yesterday’s Modern Times Are No Longer Modern: Swedish Unions Confront Double Shift. In The Brave New World of European Labor: European Trade Unions at the Millennium. edited by Andrew Martin" Berghahn Books 1999

      20 Schmidt, Josef, "Wohlfahrtsstaaten im Vergliech" Bochum 2010

      21 Clayton, Richard, "Welfare-state retrenchment revisited: Entitlement cuts, public sector restructuring and inegalitarian trends in advanced capitalist societies" 51 (51): 67-98, 1998

      22 Rimlinger, Gaston, "Welfare Policy and Industrialization in Europe, America, and Russia" John Wiley 1971

      23 Shaw·Eric, "Von, Old Labour, In New Labour: Die Transformation der britischen SOzialdemokratie" Vostand der SPD 1996

      24 Giddens, A, "The Third Way" Polity Press 2000

      25 Padgett, Stephen, "The German Social Democrats. A Redefinition of Social Democracy or Bad Godesberg Mark II?"

      26 Giddens, A, "The Critics of the Third Way" Polity Press 2004

      27 Lindgren, Anne-Marie, "Swedish Social Democracy in Transition"

      28 Pontusson, Jonas, "Sweden: After the Golden Age. in Mapping the West European Left" Patrick Camiller New York 1994

      29 Esping-Andersen, Gøsta, "States Against Markets" Princeton Uiversity Press 1985

      30 Schmidt, Manfred G., "Sozialpolitik in Deutschland: Historische Entwicklung und internationaler Vergleich" Leske+Budrich 1998

      31 Kersbergen, "Social Capitalism: A study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State" Routledge 1995

      32 Miliband, David, "Reinventing the Left" Polity Press 1994

      33 Wolinetz, S, "Reconstructing Dutch Social Democracy. Wood, Stewart, 2001, In The New Politics of the Welfare State" Oxford University Press 368-409, 2001

      34 Garrett, Geoffrey, "Political Responses to Interdependence: What’s, Left’ for the Left" 45 : 539-564, 1991

      35 Sassoon, Donald, "One Hundred Years of Socialism: The West European Left in the Twentieth Century" The New Press 1996

      36 Le Grand, Julian, "New Approaches to the Welfare State"

      37 PvdA, "Modern Social Security"

      38 Giddens, A, "Jenseits von Links und Rechts" Suhrkamp 1997

      39 Huber, Evelyne, "Internationalization and the Social Democratic Model: Crisis and Future Projects" 31 : 353-398, 1998

      40 Seeleib-Kaiser. Martin, "Globalisierung und Sozialpolitik. Ein Vergleich der Wohlfahrtssvsteme in Deutschland" Campus 2001

      41 Merkel, Wolfgang, "Ende der Sozialdemokratie?, In Machtressourcen und Regierungspolitik im Westeuropäischen Vergleich" Campus 1993

      42 Becker, Fans, "Dutch Social Democracy between Blair and Jospin" 1998

      43 Mückenberger, Ulrich, "Die Krise des Normalarbeitsverhältnisses: hat das Arbeitsrecht noch Zukunft?" 31 : 1985

      44 Dahrendorf, R, "Die Chancen der Krise" Ueber die Zukunft des Liberalismus 1983

      45 Blair/Schroeder, "Der Weg nach vorne fuer Europas Sozialdemokraten" Bonn 1999

      46 Czada, Roland, "Der Vereinigungsprozess- Wandel der externen und internen Konstitutionsbedingungen" Staerken und Schwaechen im weltweiten Strukturwandel 1998

      47 Merkel,A, "CDU당수의회연설"

      48 Labour Party, "Britain will be better with new Labour"

      49 Zohlnhoefer, R, "Bestimmungsfaktoren der Privatisierungserloese in EU-und OECD-Staaten 1990~2000" 6 (6): 602-628, 2005

      50 Schmidt, Manfred G, "Allerweltsparteien in Westeuropa? Ein Beitrag zu Kirchheimers These vom Wandel des westeuropäischen Parteiensystems" 13 : 376-397, 1985

      51 나병균, "1980년 이후 서유럽 복지국가들의 신보수주의와 사회보장제도의 개혁: 프랑스, 독일, 영국의 예" 13 (13): 207-246, 1997

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-10-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Dispute Resolution Studies Review KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.72 0.72 0.9
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.79 0.79 1.132 0.17
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼