RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      미국의 교원양성 프로그램 인증제도에 대한 분석: CAEP 체제를 중심으로

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107065268

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study analyzes the case of the United States, wherein teacher education programs have been systemically accredited, in order to draw implications for Korea. To this end, an evaluation system analysis framework (system background, enforcement agency, certification process, and certification standards) was established, and the certification system of the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) was analyzed based on this framework.
      The analysis results show that the current certification system for US teacher training programs follow the flow of data-based, performance- oriented education reform, and that CAEP established accreditation standards in connection with external standards and in cooperation with external organizations. Moreover, by setting the accreditation period as 7 years, the education programs can be operated with the goal of improving the program quality from a longer-term perspective.
      Thus, the competency diagnosis of teacher education institutes in Korea must include the performance of graduates in the indicators. The method for quality management must be materialized by a major field. Moreover, to ensure the predictability of the teacher education institution for the competency diagnosis, it is necessary to pre-announce the diagnosis period and diagnostic indicators before a specific period (1 year).
      번역하기

      This study analyzes the case of the United States, wherein teacher education programs have been systemically accredited, in order to draw implications for Korea. To this end, an evaluation system analysis framework (system background, enforcement agen...

      This study analyzes the case of the United States, wherein teacher education programs have been systemically accredited, in order to draw implications for Korea. To this end, an evaluation system analysis framework (system background, enforcement agency, certification process, and certification standards) was established, and the certification system of the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) was analyzed based on this framework.
      The analysis results show that the current certification system for US teacher training programs follow the flow of data-based, performance- oriented education reform, and that CAEP established accreditation standards in connection with external standards and in cooperation with external organizations. Moreover, by setting the accreditation period as 7 years, the education programs can be operated with the goal of improving the program quality from a longer-term perspective.
      Thus, the competency diagnosis of teacher education institutes in Korea must include the performance of graduates in the indicators. The method for quality management must be materialized by a major field. Moreover, to ensure the predictability of the teacher education institution for the competency diagnosis, it is necessary to pre-announce the diagnosis period and diagnostic indicators before a specific period (1 year).

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박선형, "호주의 교원양성 질 관리 기제의 특징과 정책적 시사점" 한국비교교육학회 30 (30): 101-122, 2020

      2 김병주, "한국과 미국의 교사양성기관평가 비교 연구" 한국비교교육학회 14 (14): 1-43, 2004

      3 배소연, "유아교사교육기준 구성 방안에 관한 연구- 미국 교사교육기준의 분석을 중심으로 -" 한국유아교육학회 34 (34): 275-307, 2014

      4 이광현, "미국의 학업성취도 평가 현황 및 활용 방안 연구" 한국비교교육학회 21 (21): 81-105, 2011

      5 이덕란, "미국의 기초학력 보장 강화"

      6 박상완, "미국과 영국의 교원양성기관 평가제의 특징과 정책적 시사점" 한국초등교육학회 23 (23): 283-307, 2010

      7 이옥선, "미국 체육 교사양성 프로그램 평가체제의 특징과 시사점" 한국교원교육학회 28 (28): 73-92, 2011

      8 하봉운, "미국 NCLB(No Child Left Behind)법 성과평가 관리의 특징과 시사점" 한국교육정치학회 21 (21): 121-145, 2014

      9 "교원양성기관 역량진단, 교원양성기관 역량진단 연혁"

      10 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, "Transforming Competencies for 2030"

      1 박선형, "호주의 교원양성 질 관리 기제의 특징과 정책적 시사점" 한국비교교육학회 30 (30): 101-122, 2020

      2 김병주, "한국과 미국의 교사양성기관평가 비교 연구" 한국비교교육학회 14 (14): 1-43, 2004

      3 배소연, "유아교사교육기준 구성 방안에 관한 연구- 미국 교사교육기준의 분석을 중심으로 -" 한국유아교육학회 34 (34): 275-307, 2014

      4 이광현, "미국의 학업성취도 평가 현황 및 활용 방안 연구" 한국비교교육학회 21 (21): 81-105, 2011

      5 이덕란, "미국의 기초학력 보장 강화"

      6 박상완, "미국과 영국의 교원양성기관 평가제의 특징과 정책적 시사점" 한국초등교육학회 23 (23): 283-307, 2010

      7 이옥선, "미국 체육 교사양성 프로그램 평가체제의 특징과 시사점" 한국교원교육학회 28 (28): 73-92, 2011

      8 하봉운, "미국 NCLB(No Child Left Behind)법 성과평가 관리의 특징과 시사점" 한국교육정치학회 21 (21): 121-145, 2014

      9 "교원양성기관 역량진단, 교원양성기관 역량진단 연혁"

      10 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, "Transforming Competencies for 2030"

      11 Council for Higher Education Accreditation, "The value of accreditation"

      12 Tatto, M. T., "The Emergence of High-Stakes Accountability Policies in Teacher Preparation: An Examination of the U.S. Department of Education's Proposed Regulations" 24 (24): 2016

      13 National Council on Teacher Quality, "Teacher Prep Review 2014"

      14 Ehlert, M. K., "Selecting Growth Measures for Use in School Evaluation Systems" 30 : 465-, 2016

      15 Database of Accredited Postsecondary Institutions and Programs, "Role of the U.S. Department of Education in postsecondary accreditation"

      16 Brookings Institution, "Learning to Leapfrog: Innovative Pedagogies"

      17 Tatto, M. T., "Knowledge, Policy and Practice in Teacher Education: A Cross-National Study" Bloomsbury Academic 2019

      18 Cochran-Smith, M., "Introduction : The politics of policy in teacher education : International perspectives" 77 : 3-4, 2013

      19 Council of Chief State School Officers, "InTASC: Model core teaching standards and learning progressions for teachers 1.0"

      20 Hanson, K., "Georogia standards for the approval of educator preparation providers and educator preparation programs"

      21 Georgia., "Educator Preparation Rules: 505-3-.02 Educator preparation provider reporting and evaluation"

      22 Popham, J. A., "Does CAEP Have it Right? An Analysis of the Impact of the Diversity of Field Placements on Elementary Candidates' Teacher Performance Assessments Completed During Student Teaching" Brigham Young University 2015

      23 Council for Higher Education Accreditation, "CHEA at a glance. History of CAEP"

      24 Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation, "CAEP consolidated handbook"

      25 Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation, "CAEP 2018K-6 Elementary teacher prepration standards"

      26 Hegji, A., "An overview of accreditation of higher education in the United States"

      27 Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation, "Accreditation policy"

      28 U. S. Department of Education(USDOE), "Accreditation in the United States. U.S. Department of Education(USDOE)"

      29 Office of Postsecondary Education, "A proposed rule by the education department on 12/03/2014"

      30 Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation, "2013 CAEP standards"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼