본 연구는 MMO(Massive1y Multi-player Online) 게임플레이 경험에 관한 게이머의 행동을 체계적으로 코드화 할 수 있는 분석적 틀을 개발하고 문제해결과정으로서의 게임플레이를 실증적으로 규명하...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
국문 초록 (Abstract)
본 연구는 MMO(Massive1y Multi-player Online) 게임플레이 경험에 관한 게이머의 행동을 체계적으로 코드화 할 수 있는 분석적 틀을 개발하고 문제해결과정으로서의 게임플레이를 실증적으로 규명하...
본 연구는 MMO(Massive1y Multi-player Online) 게임플레이 경험에 관한 게이머의 행동을 체계적으로 코드화 할 수 있는 분석적 틀을 개발하고 문제해결과정으로서의 게임플레이를 실증적으로 규명하는데 목적이 있다. MMO 게임플레이 경험에 관한 분석틀은 모델휴먼프로세서, 내용기반연구, 절차기반연구를 고찰하여 전체적인 틀을 구축하였다. 게임플레이에 관한 구체적인 행동과 내용은 MMO 게임에 관한 실증적 실험 진행과 동시조서 분석을 통하여 도출되었다. 그 결과를 통해서 MMO 게임플레이 행동은 운동, 지각 기능 표상 시뮬레이션, 법칙 행동(휴리스틱스, 법칙적용, 법칙초월)들로 분류되어 MMO 게임에 적합한 새로운 분석틀이 개발되었다. 본 실험결과 시행착오를 통해 게임의 법칙을 발견하는 '휴리스틱행동' 해당 법칙을 따르는 '법칙적용행동', 해당법칙을 초월하는 '법칙초월행동'이 발견되었다. 특히 문제공간에서 '법칙적용행동'과 '법칙초월행동'이 시행되는 두 가지 법칙공간이 발견되었다. 새로 발견된 법칙공간과 게임플레이 패턴은 MMO 게임의 레벨디자인 요소에 해당하는 지역특성, 몬스터의 속성, 아이템, 스킬 등을 결정하는데 중요한 기초를 마련한다. 그래서 본 연구결과는 MMO 게임의 품질을 향상하기 위한 게임디자인 방법론에 중요한 시사점을 제공할 것이다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The objective of this study is to develop an analytic framework to code systematically the gamer's behaviour in MMO(Massively Multi-player Online) gameplay experience, to explore their gameplay as a problem solving procedure empirically. Previous stud...
The objective of this study is to develop an analytic framework to code systematically the gamer's behaviour in MMO(Massively Multi-player Online) gameplay experience, to explore their gameplay as a problem solving procedure empirically. Previous studies about model human processor, content based protocol, and procedure based protocol are reviewed in order to build the outline of the analytic framework related to MMO gameplay. The specific gameplay actions and contents were derived by using concurrent protocol analysis method through the empirical experiment executed in MMORPG gameplay. Consequently, gameplay are divided into six actions : kinematics, perception, function, representation, simulation, and rule (heuristics, following, and transcedence). The analytic framework suitable for MMO gameplay was built. As a result of this study, we found three rule spaces in the problem solving domain of gameplay that are an heuristics, a following of the rule, and a transcendence of the rule. 'Heuristics' denotes the rule action that discovers the rule of game through trial-and-error. 'Following' indicates the rule action that follows the rule of game embedded in game by game designers. 'Transcendence' presents the rule action that transcends that. The new discovered rule spaces where 'Following' and 'Transcendence' actions occur and the gameplay pattern in them is provided with the key basis to determine the level design elements of MMO game, such as terrain feature, monster attribute, item, and skill et cetera. Therefore, this study is concludes with key implications to support game design to improve the quality of MMO game product.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 이준희, "영화의 몽타주 기법을 통해 분석해 본 게임 스토리텔링 - 게임 World of Warcraft를 중심으로 -" 한국디자인학회 19 (19): 119-128, 2006
2 "http://www.gamestudies.org/0101/juul-gts/"
3 "http://gigaom.com/2007/06/13/top-ten-most-popular- mmos"
4 "http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topicId=19110335191&sid=1"
5 J. Hahn, "Why Are Some Diagrams Easier to Work with? Effects of Diagrammatic Representation on The Cognitive Integration Process of Systems Analysis and Design" 6 (6): 181-213, 1999
6 M. Suwa, "What Architects See in Their Design Sketches : Implications for Design Tools" 191-192, 1996
7 Newman. J, "Videogames" Taylor & Francis Group 2004
8 Elgood. C, "Using Management Game 2nd Ed" Grower Press 1996
9 Hayes, J, "Understanding written problem instructions. in: Models of Thought, Vol. 1" Yale University Press 451-476, 1979
10 J. Hughes, "Trends in use of verbal protocol analysis in software engineering research" 22 (22): 127-140, 2003
1 이준희, "영화의 몽타주 기법을 통해 분석해 본 게임 스토리텔링 - 게임 World of Warcraft를 중심으로 -" 한국디자인학회 19 (19): 119-128, 2006
2 "http://www.gamestudies.org/0101/juul-gts/"
3 "http://gigaom.com/2007/06/13/top-ten-most-popular- mmos"
4 "http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topicId=19110335191&sid=1"
5 J. Hahn, "Why Are Some Diagrams Easier to Work with? Effects of Diagrammatic Representation on The Cognitive Integration Process of Systems Analysis and Design" 6 (6): 181-213, 1999
6 M. Suwa, "What Architects See in Their Design Sketches : Implications for Design Tools" 191-192, 1996
7 Newman. J, "Videogames" Taylor & Francis Group 2004
8 Elgood. C, "Using Management Game 2nd Ed" Grower Press 1996
9 Hayes, J, "Understanding written problem instructions. in: Models of Thought, Vol. 1" Yale University Press 451-476, 1979
10 J. Hughes, "Trends in use of verbal protocol analysis in software engineering research" 22 (22): 127-140, 2003
11 K. Bielaczyc, "Training in Self-explanation and Self-regulation Strategies: Investigating The Effects of Knowledge Acquisition Activities on Problem Solving" 13 (13): 221-252, 1995
12 J. Kim, "Towards a Model of Cognitive Process in Logical Design : Comparing Object-Oriented and Traditional Functional Decomposition Software Methodologies" 3-7, 1992
13 Klabbers. J, "Three Easy Pieces : A Taxonomy on Gaming" Chapman and Hall 1999
14 Mayer. R, "Thinking, Problem Solving, Cognition. 2nd Ed" Freeman 1991
15 Van Someren, M, "The Think Aloud Method : A Practical Guide to Modeling Cognitive Processes" Academic Press Prof., Inc. 1994
16 Card, K, "The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Pub 1983
17 Crawford. C, "The Art of Computer Game Design"
18 J. Funk, "Reevaluating the impact of video games" 32 (32): 86-90, 1993
19 J. Kim, "Reasoning with Multiple Diagrams : Focusing on The Cognitive Integration Process" 376-381, 1997
20 S. Wineburg, "Reading Abraham Lincoln: An Expert/Expert Study in The Interpretation of Historical Texts" 22 (22): 319-346, 1998
21 Simon, H, "Problem solving and rule induction" Yale University Press 329-346, 1977
22 E. Kant, "Problem Solving Techniques for The Design of Algorithms" 97-118, 1984
23 C. Fabricatore, "Playability in Action Videogames: A Qualitative Design Model" 17 : 311-368, 2002
24 S. Sonnentag, "Planning and Knowledge about Strategies: Their Relationship to Work Characteristics in Software Design" 15 (15): 213-225, 1996
25 Friedman. T, "Making Sense of Software: Computer Games and Interactive Textuality. in: Cybersociety" Sage Publications 1995
26 송승근, "MMO게임 디자인의 사용성 평가와 핵심디자인 요인" 한국디자인학회 19 (19): 195-206, 2006
27 J. Kim, "Internal Representation and Rule Development in Object-Oriented Design" 2 (2): 357-390, 1995
28 Newell, A, "Human Problem Solving" Prentice Hall 1972
29 김진우, "Human Computer Interaction 개론" 안그라픽스 2005
30 S. Wineburg, "Historical Problem Solving: A Study of The Cognitive Processes Used in The Evaluation of Documentary and Picture Evidence" 83 (83): 79-87, 1991
31 Juul. J, "Half-Real: Video Games Between Real Rules and Fictional Worlds" The MIT Press 2005
32 S. Sonnentag, "Expertise in Professional Software Design : a Process Study" 83 (83): 703-715, 1998
33 G. Irwin, "Expert-novice Differences in Object-oriented Modelling" 719-720, 1998
34 Simon, H, "Empirical Tests of a Theory of Human Acquisition of Concepts for Sequential Patters. Vol. I" Yale University Press 274-291, 1977
35 "ESA(The Entertainment Software Association)"
36 D. Klahr, "Dual Space Search During Scientific Reasoning" 12 (12): 1-48, 1998
37 D. Myers, "Computer Game Semiotics" 4 : 1991
38 J. Sutcliffe, "Analysing The Novice Aanalyst: Cognitive Models in Software Engineering" 36 : 719-740, 1992
39 F. Detienne, "An Empirically- derived Control Structure for The Process of Program Understanding" 33 : 323-342, 1990
40 J. Hong, "A Study on Thinking Strategy between Experts and Novices of Computer Games" 19 (19): 245-258, 2003
41 Adelson, B., "A Model for Software Design. in: Tile Nature of Expertise" Lawrence Erlbaum 185-208, 1988
42 B. John, "A GOMS Analysis of a Graphic, Machine-Paced, Highly Interactive Task" 251-258, 1992
43 M. Kavakli, "A Cognitive Modeling Approach to Capturing The Context of Complex Behavior in Gameplay" 2002
44 C. Schumn, "A 4Space Model of Scientific Discovery" 106-111, 1995
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2027 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
2005-06-29 | 학회명변경 | 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korea Game Society | ![]() |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.54 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.54 | 0.51 | 0.691 | 0.09 |