RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    국민연금 민영화 주장에 대한 비판적 고찰 = A Critical Consideration on Privatizing the National Pension System in Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3078925

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this paper is to examine critically the recent debates on privatizing of the National Pension System(NPS) in Korea. The paper is developed through both a critical examination of the rationales for the privatization and a case study on Chilean Pension Reform of 1981. The theoretical examination leads me to the conclusion that the Rationales for supporting a privatization. of the public pension system are those like immunity of the private system related to demographic change, admistrative efficiency, its positive effects on the economic growth etc. and those rationals are not correct. The Chilean case is often cited to support the arguments for privatizing the public pension system. However, as the Chilean Pension Reform in 1981 was the last alternative for Chile to solve the financial problems of the old public pension system, the Chilean model is not regarded as an adequate one to reform not only the public pension system generally, but also the NPS in Korea specially. A substitution of the public pension system to the private one does not guarantee to improve individual and national prosperities. It does not also help to reduce the distribution conflict and the financial problem of the public pension system related to demographical change and economic recession. Therefore, it is not regarded that privatization is the best alternative to reform the public pension system of Korea.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this paper is to examine critically the recent debates on privatizing of the National Pension System(NPS) in Korea. The paper is developed through both a critical examination of the rationales for the privatization and a case study on C...

    The purpose of this paper is to examine critically the recent debates on privatizing of the National Pension System(NPS) in Korea. The paper is developed through both a critical examination of the rationales for the privatization and a case study on Chilean Pension Reform of 1981. The theoretical examination leads me to the conclusion that the Rationales for supporting a privatization. of the public pension system are those like immunity of the private system related to demographic change, admistrative efficiency, its positive effects on the economic growth etc. and those rationals are not correct. The Chilean case is often cited to support the arguments for privatizing the public pension system. However, as the Chilean Pension Reform in 1981 was the last alternative for Chile to solve the financial problems of the old public pension system, the Chilean model is not regarded as an adequate one to reform not only the public pension system generally, but also the NPS in Korea specially. A substitution of the public pension system to the private one does not guarantee to improve individual and national prosperities. It does not also help to reduce the distribution conflict and the financial problem of the public pension system related to demographical change and economic recession. Therefore, it is not regarded that privatization is the best alternative to reform the public pension system of Korea.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼