RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    가상화폐의 의미와 법적지위 - 비트코인을 중심으로 - = Understanding and Legal Status of Virtual Currency - Focusing on Bitcoin -

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105465133

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Various disputes arose following the government's announcement of a regulation plan for virtual currency at the end of 2017, but no visible regulatory measures such as the completion of legislation or the proposal of government-level regulatory measures like foreign countries have been developed.
    Japan and USA, which completed the legislation, may have legal stability, but the legal nature of the virtual currency can not be clarified, so there may be more confusion in the future.
    Before the legal regulations, this study was designed to explore the concept and nature of virtual currency based on Bitcoin which is the origin of virtual currency. First, we examined the process of acquisition of virtual currency so we called “Mining” and try to understand the way of existence of virtual money. Secondly, the current legal system, such as the electronic payment method, which has a similar existence method as the virtual currency, was examined for reference in regulating the virtual currency. It also tried to approach the nature of virtual currency by analyzing its actual usage.
    Also the recently announced accounting audit report for Virtual Money Exchange stated that virtual currency differs from assets based on existing accounting standards in accounting terms based on the classification of virtual currency into different items.
    In a criminal case, the court recognized the virtual currency as a valuable economic asset and sentenced it to forfeit.
    Conclusions were replaced by suggestions on what should be focused on in future legal regulations. Unlike the background of the virtual currency, the reason why it is misused is because there are more speculation for profit than for its merits. It proposed ways to prevent speculative demand in the future by seeking ways to give intrinsic value to virtual currencies.
    번역하기

    Various disputes arose following the government's announcement of a regulation plan for virtual currency at the end of 2017, but no visible regulatory measures such as the completion of legislation or the proposal of government-level regulatory measur...

    Various disputes arose following the government's announcement of a regulation plan for virtual currency at the end of 2017, but no visible regulatory measures such as the completion of legislation or the proposal of government-level regulatory measures like foreign countries have been developed.
    Japan and USA, which completed the legislation, may have legal stability, but the legal nature of the virtual currency can not be clarified, so there may be more confusion in the future.
    Before the legal regulations, this study was designed to explore the concept and nature of virtual currency based on Bitcoin which is the origin of virtual currency. First, we examined the process of acquisition of virtual currency so we called “Mining” and try to understand the way of existence of virtual money. Secondly, the current legal system, such as the electronic payment method, which has a similar existence method as the virtual currency, was examined for reference in regulating the virtual currency. It also tried to approach the nature of virtual currency by analyzing its actual usage.
    Also the recently announced accounting audit report for Virtual Money Exchange stated that virtual currency differs from assets based on existing accounting standards in accounting terms based on the classification of virtual currency into different items.
    In a criminal case, the court recognized the virtual currency as a valuable economic asset and sentenced it to forfeit.
    Conclusions were replaced by suggestions on what should be focused on in future legal regulations. Unlike the background of the virtual currency, the reason why it is misused is because there are more speculation for profit than for its merits. It proposed ways to prevent speculative demand in the future by seeking ways to give intrinsic value to virtual currencies.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "피자 두판이 금값으로…웃돈 치솟는 암호화폐"

    2 김홍기, "최근 디지털 가상화폐 거래의 법적 쟁점과 운용방안 - 비트코인 거래를 위주로 -" 한국증권법학회 15 (15): 377-431, 2014

    3 "전자금융거래법 일부 개정법률안"

    4 김동섭, "분산원장 기술과 디지털통화의 현황 및 시사점" 한국은행 2016

    5 김수형, "국내 네트워크형 전자화폐 동향 및 시사점, in 전자통신동향분석" 2004

    6 "가상화폐 '엇박자'에 국조실 직접 정리…향후 대책 주목"

    7 차현진, "가상통화․블록체인 공청회 발표문"

    8 "가상통화(virtual currency) 현황 및 대응방향"

    9 정순섭, "가상통화 및 블록체인 관련 공청회 발표문"

    10 ECB, "Virtual Currency Schemes"

    1 "피자 두판이 금값으로…웃돈 치솟는 암호화폐"

    2 김홍기, "최근 디지털 가상화폐 거래의 법적 쟁점과 운용방안 - 비트코인 거래를 위주로 -" 한국증권법학회 15 (15): 377-431, 2014

    3 "전자금융거래법 일부 개정법률안"

    4 김동섭, "분산원장 기술과 디지털통화의 현황 및 시사점" 한국은행 2016

    5 김수형, "국내 네트워크형 전자화폐 동향 및 시사점, in 전자통신동향분석" 2004

    6 "가상화폐 '엇박자'에 국조실 직접 정리…향후 대책 주목"

    7 차현진, "가상통화․블록체인 공청회 발표문"

    8 "가상통화(virtual currency) 현황 및 대응방향"

    9 정순섭, "가상통화 및 블록체인 관련 공청회 발표문"

    10 ECB, "Virtual Currency Schemes"

    11 "The Crypto-Currency-Bitcoin and its mysterious inventor"

    12 남기연, "Bitcoin의 법적 가치에 관한 연구" 법학연구소 38 (38): 525-549, 2014

    13 Nakamoto, Satoshi, "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System"

    14 "'가상화폐 규제반대' 靑국민청원 18만3천명…20만 돌파 임박"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.09 1.09 0.95
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.81 0.75 0.922 0.48
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼