RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      한국 언론의 교육현실에 대한 인식과 그 문제점 비판 = The Recognition on Educational Reality of the Korean Press

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A30047149

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This Study was to analyze the recognition of the Korean press on educational reality and its problems which was expressed in editorials of Chosun Ilbo, JungAng Ilbo, and Dong-a Ilbo after departure of Kim Dae Jung government. The three newspapers recognized that Korean education was collapsed or was on the verge of collapse. They thought two factors were the major causes of educational collapse in Korea. The one was the policy failure of ministry of education, and the other was the insufficient quality of teacher. They indicated educational equalization system and university entrance examination system etc. as representative wrong policies. The three newspapers suggested that educational equalization policy be abolished or reduced to overcome educational crisis, and that competitive system be introduced into teaching profession. The reports of these newspapers contained four major problems; Firstly, they treated lightly the fundamental cause of educational crisis in Korea. The crisis of Korean education was caused from the social climate of success for success' sake, and so it is necessary to change radically this climate to overcome educational crisis. However, focusing on the first-class university, they promote the excessive competition for university entrance examination and the social climate of success for success' sake. Secondly, they are little interested in the tasks which are pursued and achieved in elementary and secondary education. They overemphasize the competitive power and the excellence of education and elementary and secondary education is reported only with regard to university entrance. Thirdly, the reports are inconsistent. As seen in their changeable and arbitrary evaluation on the policy of ministry of equation, they report impromptu and sensationally with no clear criteria. Fourthly, the reports of these newspapers make educational reality worse rather than serve to normalize it. Especially, educational authority was fallen down rapidly by irresponsible reports on the accidents concerning teachers, and educational crisis was accelerated.
      번역하기

      This Study was to analyze the recognition of the Korean press on educational reality and its problems which was expressed in editorials of Chosun Ilbo, JungAng Ilbo, and Dong-a Ilbo after departure of Kim Dae Jung government. The three newspapers reco...

      This Study was to analyze the recognition of the Korean press on educational reality and its problems which was expressed in editorials of Chosun Ilbo, JungAng Ilbo, and Dong-a Ilbo after departure of Kim Dae Jung government. The three newspapers recognized that Korean education was collapsed or was on the verge of collapse. They thought two factors were the major causes of educational collapse in Korea. The one was the policy failure of ministry of education, and the other was the insufficient quality of teacher. They indicated educational equalization system and university entrance examination system etc. as representative wrong policies. The three newspapers suggested that educational equalization policy be abolished or reduced to overcome educational crisis, and that competitive system be introduced into teaching profession. The reports of these newspapers contained four major problems; Firstly, they treated lightly the fundamental cause of educational crisis in Korea. The crisis of Korean education was caused from the social climate of success for success' sake, and so it is necessary to change radically this climate to overcome educational crisis. However, focusing on the first-class university, they promote the excessive competition for university entrance examination and the social climate of success for success' sake. Secondly, they are little interested in the tasks which are pursued and achieved in elementary and secondary education. They overemphasize the competitive power and the excellence of education and elementary and secondary education is reported only with regard to university entrance. Thirdly, the reports are inconsistent. As seen in their changeable and arbitrary evaluation on the policy of ministry of equation, they report impromptu and sensationally with no clear criteria. Fourthly, the reports of these newspapers make educational reality worse rather than serve to normalize it. Especially, educational authority was fallen down rapidly by irresponsible reports on the accidents concerning teachers, and educational crisis was accelerated.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
      • Ⅱ. 언론의 교육현실 인식
      • Ⅲ. 언론이 제시한 교육붕괴의 원인과 해법
      • Ⅳ. 언론의 교육현실 인식에 대한 문제
      • Ⅴ. 맺음말
      • Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
      • Ⅱ. 언론의 교육현실 인식
      • Ⅲ. 언론이 제시한 교육붕괴의 원인과 해법
      • Ⅳ. 언론의 교육현실 인식에 대한 문제
      • Ⅴ. 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      • ABSTRACT
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼