RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국 자동차산업 산업내무역의 특성 및 결정요인 분석 : 품질차이, FDI 및 무역불균형을 중심으로 = Main Features and Determinants of Intra-industry Trade in Korea`s Auto Industry : Focusing on Quality Difference, FDI and Trade Imbalance

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101747809

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Conventional theory of comparative advantage hardly explains intra-industry trade which is defined as simultaneous exports and imports of products within the same industry between countries with similar production factor abundance. Proliferation of intra-industry trade has been followed by tons of theoretical and empirical research on it. In the late 1980’s, arguments was raised that intra-industry trade be decomposed into vertical and horizontal intra-industry trade on the basis of product characteristics. While some previous domestic researches analyzed intra-industry trade in Korea’s auto sector, they failed to identify that intra-industry trade in Korea’s auto sector may be materialized by vertical. This is a theoretical prediction, because auto industry is typical durable consumer product industry. With the motivation, this article is to analyze the characteristics and determinants of vertical intra-industry trade in auto sector between Korea and OECD member countries during 1991~2012, using gravity model. Empirical analysis employs not only country-specific variables such as average economic scale, per capita GNI gap and geographic distance between trading partners, but also industry-specific variables such as FDI, product quality difference and trade imbalance ratio. Empirical approach of this paper is in contrast with the previous research, particularly in the following aspects. By decomposing IIT index(Grubel- Lloyd index), it seeks to examine the vertical intra-industry factor and its trade pattern in Korea’s intra-industry trade in auto sector. Level of trade imbalance is another concern to check, since it is associated with downward bias of IIT index. Along with due adjustment of downward bias from trade imbalance, product quality difference and FDI are also reflected as explanatory variables in estimating determinants of vertical intra-industry trade. First of all, research output confirms that Korea’s intra-industry trade vis-a-vis OECD is represented by vertical one, where Korea exports low quality products and imports high quality. Another important finding is significant level of trade imbalance in vertically differentiated product category and downward bias of IIT index, accordingly. Among explanatory variables, economic size, geographic distance and trade imbalance turn out best significant fits in interpreting vertical intra-industry trade. Product quality difference proves to be highly significant variable, but unexpectedly negative relationship with vertical intra-industry trade in auto parts sector.
    번역하기

    Conventional theory of comparative advantage hardly explains intra-industry trade which is defined as simultaneous exports and imports of products within the same industry between countries with similar production factor abundance. Proliferation of in...

    Conventional theory of comparative advantage hardly explains intra-industry trade which is defined as simultaneous exports and imports of products within the same industry between countries with similar production factor abundance. Proliferation of intra-industry trade has been followed by tons of theoretical and empirical research on it. In the late 1980’s, arguments was raised that intra-industry trade be decomposed into vertical and horizontal intra-industry trade on the basis of product characteristics. While some previous domestic researches analyzed intra-industry trade in Korea’s auto sector, they failed to identify that intra-industry trade in Korea’s auto sector may be materialized by vertical. This is a theoretical prediction, because auto industry is typical durable consumer product industry. With the motivation, this article is to analyze the characteristics and determinants of vertical intra-industry trade in auto sector between Korea and OECD member countries during 1991~2012, using gravity model. Empirical analysis employs not only country-specific variables such as average economic scale, per capita GNI gap and geographic distance between trading partners, but also industry-specific variables such as FDI, product quality difference and trade imbalance ratio. Empirical approach of this paper is in contrast with the previous research, particularly in the following aspects. By decomposing IIT index(Grubel- Lloyd index), it seeks to examine the vertical intra-industry factor and its trade pattern in Korea’s intra-industry trade in auto sector. Level of trade imbalance is another concern to check, since it is associated with downward bias of IIT index. Along with due adjustment of downward bias from trade imbalance, product quality difference and FDI are also reflected as explanatory variables in estimating determinants of vertical intra-industry trade. First of all, research output confirms that Korea’s intra-industry trade vis-a-vis OECD is represented by vertical one, where Korea exports low quality products and imports high quality. Another important finding is significant level of trade imbalance in vertically differentiated product category and downward bias of IIT index, accordingly. Among explanatory variables, economic size, geographic distance and trade imbalance turn out best significant fits in interpreting vertical intra-industry trade. Product quality difference proves to be highly significant variable, but unexpectedly negative relationship with vertical intra-industry trade in auto parts sector.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김석민, "한국과 OECD 국가 간 자동차산업의 산업 내 무역 결정요인 연구" 국제지역학회 17 (17): 259-284, 2013

    2 김태기, "한국 자동차산업의 산업내무역과 산업정책" 41 (41): 197-218, 1994

    3 김성철, "우리나라 자동차산업의 수출경쟁력과 산업내 무역 분석" 한국산업경제학회 22 (22): 1241-1259, 2009

    4 이한영, "국가 간 규제 및 IT활용 격차의 서비스무역에 대한 영향" 한국관세학회 14 (14): 247-264, 2013

    5 Balassa, "try and Multi-Industry Framework" 97 (97): 923-939,

    6 Greenaway, D., "Vertical and Horizontal Intra-Industry Trade : A Cross Industry Analysis for The United Kingdom" 105 (105): 1505-1518, 1995

    7 Turkcan, K., "Vertical Intra-industry Trade and Product Fragmentation in the Auto-Parts Industry" 11 (11): 149-186, 2010

    8 Dixit, A., "Theory of International Trade" Cambridge University Press 1980

    9 Subramanian, A., "The WTO Promotes Trade, Strongly but Unevenly" 72 (72): 151-175, 2007

    10 Ekanayake, E. M., "The U.S. Intra-Industry Trade with Caribbean Countries" 41 : 191-210, 2014

    1 김석민, "한국과 OECD 국가 간 자동차산업의 산업 내 무역 결정요인 연구" 국제지역학회 17 (17): 259-284, 2013

    2 김태기, "한국 자동차산업의 산업내무역과 산업정책" 41 (41): 197-218, 1994

    3 김성철, "우리나라 자동차산업의 수출경쟁력과 산업내 무역 분석" 한국산업경제학회 22 (22): 1241-1259, 2009

    4 이한영, "국가 간 규제 및 IT활용 격차의 서비스무역에 대한 영향" 한국관세학회 14 (14): 247-264, 2013

    5 Balassa, "try and Multi-Industry Framework" 97 (97): 923-939,

    6 Greenaway, D., "Vertical and Horizontal Intra-Industry Trade : A Cross Industry Analysis for The United Kingdom" 105 (105): 1505-1518, 1995

    7 Turkcan, K., "Vertical Intra-industry Trade and Product Fragmentation in the Auto-Parts Industry" 11 (11): 149-186, 2010

    8 Dixit, A., "Theory of International Trade" Cambridge University Press 1980

    9 Subramanian, A., "The WTO Promotes Trade, Strongly but Unevenly" 72 (72): 151-175, 2007

    10 Ekanayake, E. M., "The U.S. Intra-Industry Trade with Caribbean Countries" 41 : 191-210, 2014

    11 D'iaz Mora, C., "The Role of Comparative Advantage in Trade within Industries: A Panel Data Approach for the European Union" 138 (138): 291-316, 2002

    12 Blanes, J. V., "The Nature and Causes of Intra-Industry Trade: Back to the Comparative Advantage Explanation? The Case of Spain" 136 (136): 423-441, 2000

    13 Bergstrand, J. H., "The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model, the Linder Hypothesis, and the Determinants of Bilateral Intra-industry Trade" 100 (100): 1216-1229, 1990

    14 Becuwe, S., "The Determinants of Intra-Industry Trade:The Case of the Automobile Industry" 128 (128): 34-51, 1992

    15 Balassa, B., "The Determinants of Intra-Industry Specialization in the United States Trade" 38 (38): 220-233, 1986

    16 Turkcan, K., "Structure and Determinants if Intra-Industry Trade in the U.S. Auto-Industry" 2 (2): 15-46, 2010

    17 Krugman, P., "Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade" 70 (70): 950-959, 1980

    18 Montout, S., "Regionalization and Intra Industry Trade. An Analysis of Automobile Industry Trade in NAFTA" 16 : 137-159, 2002

    19 Torstensson, J., "Quality Differentiation and Factor Proportions in International Trade: An Empirical Test of the Swedish Case" 127 (127): 183-194, 1991

    20 Falvey, R. E., "Protection and Competition in International Trade : Essays in Honour of W. M. Corden" Blackwell 1987

    21 Magee, C. S., "New Measures of Trade Creation and Trade Diversion" 75 (75): 349-362, 2008

    22 Markusen, J. R., "Multinationals, Multi-Plant Economies, and the Gains from Trade" 16 (16): 205-226, 1984

    23 Helpman, E., "Market Structure and Foreign Trade:Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition, and the International Economy" MIT Press 1985

    24 Krugman, P., "Intraindustry specialization and the Gains from Trade" 89 (89): 959-973, 1981

    25 Kol, J., "Intra-Industry Trade: Theory, Evidence and Extensions" St. Martin’s Press 1989

    26 Ito, K., "Intra-Industry Trade in the ASEAN Region: The Case of Automotive Industry" ICSEAD 2004

    27 Crespo, N., "Intra-Industry Trade by Types: What Can We Learn from Portuguese Data?" 140 (140): 52-79, 2004

    28 Caves, R. E., "Intra-Industry Trade and Market Structure in the Industrial Countries" 33 (33): 203-223, 1981

    29 Lancaster, K., "Intra-Industry Trade Under Perfect Monopolistic Competition" 10 (10): 151-175, 1980

    30 Grubel, H. G., "Intra-Industry Trade : The theory and measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products" Macmillan 1975

    31 Helpman, E., "International Trade in the Presence of Product Differentiation, Economies of Scale, and Monopolistic Competition : A Chamberlin-Heckscher-Ohlin Approach" 11 (11): 305-340, 1981

    32 Grimwade, N., "International Trade - New Patterns of Trade, Production &Investment" Routledge 71-110, 2000

    33 Krugman, P., "Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition and International Trade" 9 (9): 469-479, 1979

    34 Blonigen, B. A., "In search of substitution between foreign production and exports" 53 (53): 81-104, 2001

    35 Helpman, E., "Imperfect Competition and International Trade: Evidence from 14 Industrial Countries" 1 : 62-81, 1987

    36 Pittiglio, R., "Horizontal and Vertical Intra-industry Trade: An Emprirical Test of the ‘Homogeneity Hypothesis" 35 (35): 919-945, 2012

    37 Byun, J. J., "Horizontal and Vertical Intra-Industry Trade: New Evidence from Korea, 1991-1999" 5 (5): 1-29, 2005

    38 Anderson, J. E., "Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle" 93 (93): 170-192, 2003

    39 Baldwin, R., "Gravity for Dummies and Dummies for Gravity Equation" NBER 2006

    40 Lefilleur, J., "Geographic Reorganization of the European Automobile Sector" 46 (46): 71-94, 2008

    41 Abd-el-Rahman, K., "Firms' Competitive and National Comparative Advantages as Joint Determinants of Trade Composition" 127 (127): 83-97, 1991

    42 Davidson, R., "Estimation and Inference in Econometrics" Oxford University Press 320-323, 1993

    43 Svensson, R., "Effects of overseas production on home country exports : Evidence based on Swedish multinationals" 132 (132): 304-329, 1996

    44 Gullstrand, J., "Does the Measurement of Intra-industry Trade Matter?" 138 (138): 317-339, 2002

    45 Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B., "Does foreign direct investment transfer technology across borders?" 83 (83): 490-497, 2001

    46 Umemoto, M., "Development of Intra-Industry Trade between Korea and Japan: The case of Automobile Parts Industry" CITS 2005

    47 Greenaway, D., "Country-specific Factors and Pattern or Horizontal and Vertical Intra-Industry Trade in the UK" 130 (130): 77-100, 1994

    48 Falvey, R. E., "Commercial policy and indtra-industry trade" 11 (11): 495-511, 1981

    49 Baier, S. L., "Bonus vetus OLS: A Simple Method for Approximating International Trade-cost Effects using the Gravity Equation" 77 (77): 77-85, 2009

    50 Linder, S. B., "An Essay on Trade and Transformation" John Wiley and Sons 1961

    51 Ballance, R. H., "An Empirical Examination of the Role of Vertical Product Differentiation in North-South Trade" 128 (128): 330-338, 1992

    52 Brainard, S. L., "An Empirical Assessment of the Proximity-Concentration Trade-Off between Multinational Sales and Trade" 87 (87): 520-544, 1997

    53 Anderson, J. E., "A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation" 69 (69): 106-116, 1979

    54 Newey, W. K., "A Simple, Positive Semi-definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix" 55 (55): 703-708, 1987

    55 Helpman, E., "A Simple Theory of International Trade with Multinational Corporations" 92 (92): 451-471, 1984

    56 한국자동차산업협회, "2013년 기준 한국의 자동차산업, 제26호"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-04-16 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korea Association Of Trade And Indurstry Sudies -> The Korean Association of Trade and Industry Studies KCI등재
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.15 1.15 1.02
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.99 0.97 1.205 0.22
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼