RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS

    의사를 과다하게 규제하는 대한민국 의료법의 문제점과 개선방향 = Problems and improvements in the Medical Law’s excessive regulation of physicians in Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108874086

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Background: The Medical Service Act was implemented to protect the public’s health, but has come to excessively restrict the fundamental rights of medical professionals. Therefore, it is necessary to systematically organize the level of physicians’ obligations and the sanction provisions present under the Medical Law.
    Current Concepts: The Medical Law consists of 120 articles, 6 of which address physicians’ rights. However, the law also provides 72 reasons for physicians’ obligations and penalties, 40 reasons for the suspension of qualifications, 20 reasons for administrative fines, 30 reasons for corrective orders, and 17 reasons for the revocation of permission for establishment. Thus, the Medical Law provides medical professionals with approximately 150 reasons for obligations and sanctions.
    Discussion and Conclusion: We would like to suggest some measures to improve the excessive regulation of physicians under the Medical Law. First, statistics on the status of penalties and administrative dispositions must be accumulated and disclosed; second, obligations, penalties, and administrative dispositions must be stipulated in one consolidated article; third, penalties should be avoided for simple violations of duty; fourth, reasons for administrative dispositions–such as enforcement ordinances of the Medical Law–must be elevated to the Medical Law itself; fifth, the authority for administrative dispositions against medical institutions must be unified under the Minister of Health and Welfare, the subject of duties and responsibilities must be clarified as the ‘establisher of a medical institution,’ rather than a ‘medical institution,’ and the adequate time required for when two types of administrative dispositions are made must be unified; and sixth, detailed information on the administrative disposition procedures must be newly established in the Medical Law.
    번역하기

    Background: The Medical Service Act was implemented to protect the public’s health, but has come to excessively restrict the fundamental rights of medical professionals. Therefore, it is necessary to systematically organize the level of physicians...

    Background: The Medical Service Act was implemented to protect the public’s health, but has come to excessively restrict the fundamental rights of medical professionals. Therefore, it is necessary to systematically organize the level of physicians’ obligations and the sanction provisions present under the Medical Law.
    Current Concepts: The Medical Law consists of 120 articles, 6 of which address physicians’ rights. However, the law also provides 72 reasons for physicians’ obligations and penalties, 40 reasons for the suspension of qualifications, 20 reasons for administrative fines, 30 reasons for corrective orders, and 17 reasons for the revocation of permission for establishment. Thus, the Medical Law provides medical professionals with approximately 150 reasons for obligations and sanctions.
    Discussion and Conclusion: We would like to suggest some measures to improve the excessive regulation of physicians under the Medical Law. First, statistics on the status of penalties and administrative dispositions must be accumulated and disclosed; second, obligations, penalties, and administrative dispositions must be stipulated in one consolidated article; third, penalties should be avoided for simple violations of duty; fourth, reasons for administrative dispositions–such as enforcement ordinances of the Medical Law–must be elevated to the Medical Law itself; fifth, the authority for administrative dispositions against medical institutions must be unified under the Minister of Health and Welfare, the subject of duties and responsibilities must be clarified as the ‘establisher of a medical institution,’ rather than a ‘medical institution,’ and the adequate time required for when two types of administrative dispositions are made must be unified; and sixth, detailed information on the administrative disposition procedures must be newly established in the Medical Law.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김휘원 ; 김정아, "한국에서의 의사 자율규제 현황과 발전방안" 대한의사협회 59 (59): 602-611, 2016

    2 허윤정, "자율규제 근거 설정: 의료법 개정을 중심으로" 대한의사협회 59 (59): 612-621, 2016

    3 Lee E, "Research on doctors’ rights and obligations : medical law" Research Institute for Healthcare Policy 2023

    4 Shon MS, "Physician’s rights and duty" 44 : 25-32, 2001

    5 Lee E, "A study on the Canadian medical licensing management system" Research Institute for Healthcare Policy 2020

    1 김휘원 ; 김정아, "한국에서의 의사 자율규제 현황과 발전방안" 대한의사협회 59 (59): 602-611, 2016

    2 허윤정, "자율규제 근거 설정: 의료법 개정을 중심으로" 대한의사협회 59 (59): 612-621, 2016

    3 Lee E, "Research on doctors’ rights and obligations : medical law" Research Institute for Healthcare Policy 2023

    4 Shon MS, "Physician’s rights and duty" 44 : 25-32, 2001

    5 Lee E, "A study on the Canadian medical licensing management system" Research Institute for Healthcare Policy 2020

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼