RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    한 일 체육교육과정 비교분석(Ⅱ)  :  중등학교 제6차 개정안을 중심으로 = A Comparative Analysis of Middle school physical education Curriculum between Korea and Japan(Ⅱ)

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A30111198

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Physical education curriculum can be regarded as a system which consists of teachong contents selected validly on the basis of the goal Physical education.
    The purpose of this study is to analyze characteristics, trends, composition, and contents of Physical education curriculum between Korea Physical education curriculum.
    The results of the analysis is like the following;
    (1) The system, charactersistics, and need of Physical education are generally similar in both countries.
    (2) Although Physical education is a compulsory subject in both countries, there is a difference of allotting class time(period). Even if both countries provide 105 periods for Physical education, there is a lack of 25~30 periods in korea in terms of practical total class time.
    (3) The contents of Physical education in both Korea and Japan consist of theory, practical talent, and health, however, in Japanese curriculm 35 periods are allotted to the section of health in the 3rd year students.
    (4) As for the section of practical talent, while in Japan practical talent is effectively instructed by considering the variables such as regional characteristics, school situations, teachers' capability, etc., in korea the content of teaching involves too much without considering the relevant variables mentioned above. Thus, Korea teachers and student together seem to have too heavy burden, which may be one of the reasons that growing students have frustration, emotional instability, tension, etc.
    (5) Both countries are almost simost similar in teaching methods and testing. What is different, in Korea the attitude is presented in he teaching goal while presented in the unit in Japan. In addition to this, in Japan teaching methods and testing are managed effectively depending upon the number of students and school circumstances.
    번역하기

    The Physical education curriculum can be regarded as a system which consists of teachong contents selected validly on the basis of the goal Physical education. The purpose of this study is to analyze characteristics, trends, composition, and contents...

    The Physical education curriculum can be regarded as a system which consists of teachong contents selected validly on the basis of the goal Physical education.
    The purpose of this study is to analyze characteristics, trends, composition, and contents of Physical education curriculum between Korea Physical education curriculum.
    The results of the analysis is like the following;
    (1) The system, charactersistics, and need of Physical education are generally similar in both countries.
    (2) Although Physical education is a compulsory subject in both countries, there is a difference of allotting class time(period). Even if both countries provide 105 periods for Physical education, there is a lack of 25~30 periods in korea in terms of practical total class time.
    (3) The contents of Physical education in both Korea and Japan consist of theory, practical talent, and health, however, in Japanese curriculm 35 periods are allotted to the section of health in the 3rd year students.
    (4) As for the section of practical talent, while in Japan practical talent is effectively instructed by considering the variables such as regional characteristics, school situations, teachers' capability, etc., in korea the content of teaching involves too much without considering the relevant variables mentioned above. Thus, Korea teachers and student together seem to have too heavy burden, which may be one of the reasons that growing students have frustration, emotional instability, tension, etc.
    (5) Both countries are almost simost similar in teaching methods and testing. What is different, in Korea the attitude is presented in he teaching goal while presented in the unit in Japan. In addition to this, in Japan teaching methods and testing are managed effectively depending upon the number of students and school circumstances.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • 1. 연구 중요성
    • 2. 연구목적
    • Ⅱ. 연구방법
    • 1. 연구방법
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • 1. 연구 중요성
    • 2. 연구목적
    • Ⅱ. 연구방법
    • 1. 연구방법
    • 2. 분석기준
    • 3. 연구의 제한점
    • Ⅲ. 현실적 배경
    • 1. 교육과정의 정의
    • 2. 교육과정의 구성요소
    • 3. 편성의 현장
    • Ⅳ. 한·일중학교 6차 체육교육과정 비교분석
    • 1. 일본 중학교 교육과정과 개발
    • 1) 일본의 중등교육
    • 2) 일본의 중등교육과정 개발 및 활용
    • 2. 한·일 체육교육의 성격비교
    • 1) 한국의 체육교육성격
    • 2) 일본의 체육교육성격
    • 3. 한·일 각 교과 및 시간배당의 비교
    • 4. 한·일 체육교과의 체제
    • 5. 한·일 체육교육과정의 변천 비교
    • 1) 목표의 변천과정의 비교
    • 2) 영역 및 변천 비교
    • 6. 한·일 체육교육과정의 단원 및 내용비교
    • 1) 체육 이론적 측면
    • 2) 체육 실기적 측면
    • 3) 보건의 측면
    • 7. 한·일 체육교육의 영역 및 단원별 시간비교
    • 8. 한·일 체육교육의 학습지도 및 평가
    • 1) 체육학습지도의 비교
    • 2) 년간계획의 비교
    • Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론
    • 1. 요약
    • 2. 결론 및 제언
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼