RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    곤돌라 지지대 고정에 따른 수직 및 경사 파라펫의 구조적 성능

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The exterior wall maintenance of a high-rise building is regarded as important, both in terms of the building maintenance itself as well as to ensure a good image for the building. As there are risks and economic disadvantages involved in using manual workers for this work, Robot Systems have recently been introduced as an alternative means. The existing Gondola Supporting means use heavy weights or anchors for the supporting points. However, these impose a weight load and cause damage, leading to problems for the roof or the building. Therefore, the study is trying to achieve a safe range of Supporting point loads for the Gondola-type Robot System by using a non-structural Parapet. This study carried out the structural analysis of parapet shape and thickness, which had been determined in the preceding studies, through the programs and the Korean Building Code-Structural. In addition, structural experimental specimens were made with the same concrete pouring method as used in the practical sites to conduct the structural experiments. Based on the comparative analysis of the experimental results and analysis results, were understood the range to be used as a structural element. Through the experiment, it was shown that 45° and 60° sloped Parapets, compared to a 90° vertical Parapet, have a failure load lower than theoretically expected due to the changes in the axial force and moment as well as defects on the construction joints. As construction joints are considered to be relatively fragile structures, they are subject to further safety inspection when being used as structural Parapets. All 90° vertical and 45°, 60° sloped Parapets with thickness 150mm, double reinforcement are analyzed, and it has been proven that they are able to withstand 10kN Gondola-type Robot System weight load.
    번역하기

    The exterior wall maintenance of a high-rise building is regarded as important, both in terms of the building maintenance itself as well as to ensure a good image for the building. As there are risks and economic disadvantages involved in using manual...

    The exterior wall maintenance of a high-rise building is regarded as important, both in terms of the building maintenance itself as well as to ensure a good image for the building. As there are risks and economic disadvantages involved in using manual workers for this work, Robot Systems have recently been introduced as an alternative means. The existing Gondola Supporting means use heavy weights or anchors for the supporting points. However, these impose a weight load and cause damage, leading to problems for the roof or the building. Therefore, the study is trying to achieve a safe range of Supporting point loads for the Gondola-type Robot System by using a non-structural Parapet. This study carried out the structural analysis of parapet shape and thickness, which had been determined in the preceding studies, through the programs and the Korean Building Code-Structural. In addition, structural experimental specimens were made with the same concrete pouring method as used in the practical sites to conduct the structural experiments. Based on the comparative analysis of the experimental results and analysis results, were understood the range to be used as a structural element. Through the experiment, it was shown that 45° and 60° sloped Parapets, compared to a 90° vertical Parapet, have a failure load lower than theoretically expected due to the changes in the axial force and moment as well as defects on the construction joints. As construction joints are considered to be relatively fragile structures, they are subject to further safety inspection when being used as structural Parapets. All 90° vertical and 45°, 60° sloped Parapets with thickness 150mm, double reinforcement are analyzed, and it has been proven that they are able to withstand 10kN Gondola-type Robot System weight load.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Abstract
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 실험대상 콘크리트 파라펫
    • 3. 이론적 고찰
    • 4. 콘크리트 파라펫 구조해석
    • Abstract
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 실험대상 콘크리트 파라펫
    • 3. 이론적 고찰
    • 4. 콘크리트 파라펫 구조해석
    • 5. 콘크리트 파라펫 구조실험
    • 6. 콘크리트 파라펫 실험결과 및 구조해석결과
    • 7. 결론
    • REFERENCES
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 공금록, "아파트 지붕 및 옥탑 형태의 시기적 변화와 변화요인에 관한 연구" 대한건축학회 25 (25): 163-174, 2009

    2 함영복, "곤돌라형 외벽 유지관리 로봇의 이동/작업 메커니즘 및 플랫폼 개발" 한국정밀공학회 30 (30): 375-382, 2013

    3 Korea Land & Housing Corporation, "The classification of apartment roof and parapet types"

    4 Architectural Institute of Korea, "Korean Building Code-Structural"

    5 Korea Concrete Institute, "Design Application with Strength Design Method for Reinforced Concrete Building Structure"

    6 Korea Concrete Institute, "Design Application with Strength Design Method for Reinforced Concrete Building Structure"

    7 OH, S. J., "A study on types of apartment roof design and residents’ preference in metropolitan seoul area" Ajou University 2005

    1 공금록, "아파트 지붕 및 옥탑 형태의 시기적 변화와 변화요인에 관한 연구" 대한건축학회 25 (25): 163-174, 2009

    2 함영복, "곤돌라형 외벽 유지관리 로봇의 이동/작업 메커니즘 및 플랫폼 개발" 한국정밀공학회 30 (30): 375-382, 2013

    3 Korea Land & Housing Corporation, "The classification of apartment roof and parapet types"

    4 Architectural Institute of Korea, "Korean Building Code-Structural"

    5 Korea Concrete Institute, "Design Application with Strength Design Method for Reinforced Concrete Building Structure"

    6 Korea Concrete Institute, "Design Application with Strength Design Method for Reinforced Concrete Building Structure"

    7 OH, S. J., "A study on types of apartment roof design and residents’ preference in metropolitan seoul area" Ajou University 2005

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-03-25 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한건축학회 논문집(구조계) -> 대한건축학회논문집 구조계
    외국어명 : Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea(Structure & Construction) -> Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction
    KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.35 0.35 0.33
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.29 0.27 0.614 0.04
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼