Low-carbon Management;Internal Control;and Innovation of State-owned Enterprises in China

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose Innovation is key for state-owned enterprises to realize the optimization;adjustment;and upgrading of their industrial structure. Both government supervision and internal control could impact the implementation of innovation strategies of state-owned enterprises. We empirically tested low carbon operations management and the role of internal control systems in state-owned enterprise innovation;as well as influence mechanisms. Design/Methodology/Approach This paper takes State-owned A-share listed enterprises in the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges from 2009 to 2017 as research panel data;and based on corporate governance theory constructs fixed effects models;and conducts analysis using SAS9.4 software for empirical research. Findings We found a significant positive correlation between internal control and state-owned enterprise innovation;which can improve input intensity and effectively guarantee the innovation output. There is a significant positive correlation between low-carbon management and innovation of state-owned enterprises which can improve the intensity of innovation input and significantly promote innovation output. Research Implications Our results reveal that low carbon operations have a regulating effect on the relationship between internal control and state-owned enterprise innovation. Under the environment of low-carbon management;enterprises can perfect the supervision mechanism of their internal control system and improve their innovation ability.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. Introduction Ⅱ. Literature Review and Research Hypotheses Ⅲ. Research Methods Ⅳ. Empirical Analysis Ⅴ. Research Conclusions and Implications

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Wiig, H,, "What Comprises a Regional Innovation System? An Empirical Study" STEP Centre for Innovation Research 1995

2 Zhu, Y. M., "The Influence of Internal Control on the Growth of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises : From the Perspective of Technological Innovation" 10 : 82-88, 2017

3 Markard, J., "Technological Innovation Systems and the Multi-level Perspective : Towards an Integrated Framework" 37 (37): 596-615, 2008

4 Bargeron, L. L., "Sarbanes Oxley and Corporate Risk-taking" 49 (49): 34-52, 2010

5 Hu, J. N., "Research on Low-carbon Development Path and Policy of Chinese Industrial Enterprise" 12 : 1-4, 2011

6 Wang, X. Y., "New Ideas for the Development of China’s Transnational Enterprises under the Low-carbon Economic Mode" 5 : 232-233, 2010

7 Zhong, Y. X., "Management Myopia, Accounting Conservatism and Firm Innovation Inhibition" 6 : 163-177, 2017

8 He, J. K., "Low-carbon Development is an Inevitable Choice for China to Cope with Economic Crisis and Climate Crisis" 15 : 18-20, 2009

9 Ji, Z. H., "Low carbon economy and clean development mechanism" 2 : 1-4, 2008

10 Feng, X. Y., "Internal Control, Executive Incentives and Innovation Performance-An Empirical Study Based on the Effectiveness of Internal Control" (2) : 79-82, 2017

11 Kim, J., "Internal Control Weakness and Bank Loan Contracting : Evidence from SOX Section Disclosures" 86 (86): 1157-1188, 2011

12 O’Sullivan, M. T., "Innovation Enterprise and Corporate Governance" 24 (24): 393-426, 2002

13 Shrivastava, P., "Industrial/Environmental Crises and Corporate Social Responsibility" 24 (24): 211-227, 1995

14 Zhao, Y., "Game Study on the Influence of Internal Control Effectiveness on Enterprise Technological Innovation" 29 : 16-17, 2017

15 Richardson, G., "Direct and Indirect Effects of Internal Control Weakness on Accrual Quality : Evidence from a Unique Canadian Regulatory Setting" 28 (28): 675-707, 2011

16 You, J. X., "Developing a low carbon economy" 8 : 13-14, 2008

17 Dang, L., "Anti-corruption and Corporate Innovation : An Interpretation Based on Political Connections" 7 : 146-160, 2015