RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    EU의 對러시아 경제제재와 이후 EU-러시아 무역관계의 변화 -對러시아 에너지 수입을 중심으로 = Development of EU-Russia Trade Relation after EU's Sanction on Russia and EU's Energy Import

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105081512

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study pays attention to the fact that the EU is highly dependent on Russia for its fossil energy imports and it examines the development of EU-Russia trade after EU's sanction against Russia over Ukraine crisis. Before the sanction, Russia was EU's second largest importer and it used to import more than 70% of its energy imports from Russia. The latter exported 70% of its total energy export to the EU. The EU and Russia have a typical relation of consumer and supplier in fossil energy.
    During the post sanction period (2013~2016), the EU's import from Russia fell by 43%. The fall of the import has been most notable in energy products which account for 70% of EU's total import from Russia; import of crude oil, natural gas and coal reduced by 54%, 44% and 29 % respectively. However, the decrease of energy import is small in terms of net mass (weight). Import of crude oil declined only by 1% and import of the natural gas increased by 6% rather than decreased. This discrepancy between imports in value and net mass is mainly due to a drastic slide in oil prices during the same period. In reality, EU's import volume from Russia did not decline, given the fall in prices.
    Regarding EU's energy dependency on Russia, the EU Member States are still much dependent on the import from Russia for its energy products and the sanction did not change much the share of Russia in EU’s energy imports. This paper concludes that there has been no structural change in EU's energy dependence on Russia since the sanction. This means that the sanction was carefully designed in order not to affect EU-Russia relation in energy, while it drew a lot of attentions in international politics.
    This sanction and related trade development provide useful implication for Korea's external policy, given Korea's geopolitic location and policy agenda, which requires a balanced approach between diplomatic cause, security and economic benefit.
    번역하기

    This study pays attention to the fact that the EU is highly dependent on Russia for its fossil energy imports and it examines the development of EU-Russia trade after EU's sanction against Russia over Ukraine crisis. Before the sanction, Russia was EU...

    This study pays attention to the fact that the EU is highly dependent on Russia for its fossil energy imports and it examines the development of EU-Russia trade after EU's sanction against Russia over Ukraine crisis. Before the sanction, Russia was EU's second largest importer and it used to import more than 70% of its energy imports from Russia. The latter exported 70% of its total energy export to the EU. The EU and Russia have a typical relation of consumer and supplier in fossil energy.
    During the post sanction period (2013~2016), the EU's import from Russia fell by 43%. The fall of the import has been most notable in energy products which account for 70% of EU's total import from Russia; import of crude oil, natural gas and coal reduced by 54%, 44% and 29 % respectively. However, the decrease of energy import is small in terms of net mass (weight). Import of crude oil declined only by 1% and import of the natural gas increased by 6% rather than decreased. This discrepancy between imports in value and net mass is mainly due to a drastic slide in oil prices during the same period. In reality, EU's import volume from Russia did not decline, given the fall in prices.
    Regarding EU's energy dependency on Russia, the EU Member States are still much dependent on the import from Russia for its energy products and the sanction did not change much the share of Russia in EU’s energy imports. This paper concludes that there has been no structural change in EU's energy dependence on Russia since the sanction. This means that the sanction was carefully designed in order not to affect EU-Russia relation in energy, while it drew a lot of attentions in international politics.
    This sanction and related trade development provide useful implication for Korea's external policy, given Korea's geopolitic location and policy agenda, which requires a balanced approach between diplomatic cause, security and economic benefit.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "한국은행"

    2 박정호, "우크라이나 위기 발발 이후 러시아 경제상황 변화와 정책 시사점"

    3 에너지신문, "신년기고: 국제유가 하락의 원인과 전망"

    4 Forbes, "U.S. LNG In Central And Eastern Europe - Taking Diversification Seriously"

    5 WTO, "Trade Policy Review, Report by the Secretariat, the European Union" 2015

    6 WTO, "Trade Policy Review, Report by the Secretariat, Russian Federation" 2016

    7 Parker, Richard, "The Problem with Scorecards: How (and how not) to Measure the Cost-effectiveness of Economic Sanctions" 21 : 235-294, 2000

    8 Romanova, Tatiana, "The Impact of Sanctions on Russia’s Domestic and Foreign Policy, Chatham House, Russia and Eurasia Programme Meeting Summary"

    9 Cashen, Emily, "The Impact of Economic Sanctions"

    10 Bond, Ian, "The EU and Russia Uncommon Spaces" Centre for European Reform 2014

    1 "한국은행"

    2 박정호, "우크라이나 위기 발발 이후 러시아 경제상황 변화와 정책 시사점"

    3 에너지신문, "신년기고: 국제유가 하락의 원인과 전망"

    4 Forbes, "U.S. LNG In Central And Eastern Europe - Taking Diversification Seriously"

    5 WTO, "Trade Policy Review, Report by the Secretariat, the European Union" 2015

    6 WTO, "Trade Policy Review, Report by the Secretariat, Russian Federation" 2016

    7 Parker, Richard, "The Problem with Scorecards: How (and how not) to Measure the Cost-effectiveness of Economic Sanctions" 21 : 235-294, 2000

    8 Romanova, Tatiana, "The Impact of Sanctions on Russia’s Domestic and Foreign Policy, Chatham House, Russia and Eurasia Programme Meeting Summary"

    9 Cashen, Emily, "The Impact of Economic Sanctions"

    10 Bond, Ian, "The EU and Russia Uncommon Spaces" Centre for European Reform 2014

    11 Bachmeier, Lance J, "Testing for Market Integration Crude Oil, Coal, and Natural Gas" 27 : 55-71,

    12 RT, "Russia’s import ban means big business for Latin America"

    13 Vietnam Association of Seafood Exporters and Producers, "Russian food import ban benefits Vietnam"

    14 Smith, Keith C., "Russia-Europe Energy Relations: Implications for US Policy" Center for Strategic and International Studies 2010

    15 BBC, "Russia's trade ties with Europe"

    16 Birol, Fatih, "Outlook for European Gas Demand, Supply and Investment to 2030" International Enegy Agency 2005

    17 Dreyer, Iana, "On Target? EU Sanctions as Security Policy Tools" EU Institute for Security Studies 2015

    18 Reuters, "Most of Europe's Gas Supplies still Linked to Oil Prices"

    19 Elliott, Kimberly Ann, "Ineffectiveness of Economic Sanctions: Same Song, Same Refrain? Economic Sanctions in the 1990’s" 89 (89): 403-408, 1999

    20 "Index Mundi"

    21 De Vries, Anthonius W., "Improving the Effectiveness of Sanctions: A Checklist for the EU" CEPS 2014

    22 European Union Newsroom, "Highlights: EU sanctions against Russia over Ukraine crisis"

    23 Kaempfer, William H., "Hand book of Defense Economics, Vol. 2" Elsevier 874-, 2007

    24 Elliott, Kimberly Ann, "Evidence on the Costs and Benefits of Economic Sanctions, Speech given before the Subcommittee on Trade Committee on Ways and Means U.S. House of Representatives"

    25 "Eurostat"

    26 European Commission, "European Union, Trade in goods with Russia" 2014

    27 European Commission, "European Union, Trade in goods with Russia" 2017

    28 European Commission, "European Union Restrictive Measures (sanctions) in force"

    29 Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, "Economic Sanctions Reconsidered, Peterson Institute for International Economics" 2009

    30 Havlik, Peter, "Economic Consequences of the Ukraine Conflict" The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies 2014

    31 강유덕, "EU의 대러시아 경제제재와 경제적 손실가능성 점검" 8 (8): 2014

    32 European Parliament, "EU-Russia Energy Relations - Stuck together?"

    33 전혜원, "EU 제재 정책의 현황과 시사점" 외교안보연구원 2016

    34 Seth, Shobhit, "Do Oil and Natural Gas Prices Rise And Fall Together?"

    35 Reid, Gerard, "Breakdown of the relationship between oil, gas and coal prices?"

    36 Benkovskis, Konstantins, "Assessing the Full Extent of Trade Integration between the EU and Russia-A Global Value Chain Perspective" Bank of Latvia 2014

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2014-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.32 0.32 0.26
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.3 0.24 0.691 0.3
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼