RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Confidence building measures for Indo-Pak nuclear deterrence

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T14462439

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Since, the bloodstained, partition of subcontinent by British in 1947 both countries, ‘India and Pakistan’, have been involved in wars, territorial conflicts and disputes. Congress and Muslim league were the political parties of Hindu and Muslims respectively. Since congress was against the partition and wanted to see greater India, therefore they did not accept the independence of Pakistan, which put it in security dilemma because of large size, and population of India. And right after one year of independence newly born states get involved in a territorial war in 1948 followed by 1965, 1971 wars. After the defeat in 1971 war from India, Pakistan felt international humiliation and decided to have nuclear weapons in order to counter its four times larger enemy. Both countries successfully entered into nuclear club in 1998. In 1999 a limited territorial war broke out between them which lead both countries to brink of nuclear war, but presence of nuclear arsenals possessed by both states also prevented the full-fledge war and play the role of deterrence. Deterrence played effective role in prevention of war and it proved to be effective but there are limitations of deterrence and both nations paying high price for maintaining this deterrence. The instability in the region may cause the failure of deterrence, which can provoke them to use their nuclear arsenals, which cannot only be devastating for the region but also dangerous for world peace because of their strategic location. Along with deterrence peace and cooperation in the region is unavoidable for entire humanity. In the contemporary situation it’s like utopian to expect them to give up their nuclear armaments but at the same time both countries must focus on institutionalizing CBMs (Confidence building measures) to reduce enmity, bridge the gap of cooperation and interdependence on each other, and gradually aware the people of both countries that peace and cooperation can replace deterrence so that they could put pressure on their governments to make policies accordingly.
    In a region, with the history of violent conflicts, the importance of CBMs (Confidence building measures), cannot be underestimated, which are very important in reducing tensions, avoiding skirmishes, and pave the way toward peace and prosperity. Both countries, being traditional enemies and nuclear powered states, are in dire need to take measures to limit hostilities and reduce stiffness. The significance of CBMs has increased after entry of both countries into nuclear group. Military and Non-military CBMs in the region, with true spirit, are unavoidable for lasting peace and stability in the region. Though it is very hard to expect major output but at slightest CBMs between them can help in structuring an essential level of confidence among them for lasting peace and cooperation in the region and prevention of limited territorial war like ‘Kargil Crisis’ when both countries put their forces on borders and risk of nuclear war was evident. However, history of CBMs in South Asia is not inspiring because of some major impediments and confines, but still their importance cannot be ignored.
    번역하기

    Since, the bloodstained, partition of subcontinent by British in 1947 both countries, ‘India and Pakistan’, have been involved in wars, territorial conflicts and disputes. Congress and Muslim league were the political parties of Hindu and Muslims ...

    Since, the bloodstained, partition of subcontinent by British in 1947 both countries, ‘India and Pakistan’, have been involved in wars, territorial conflicts and disputes. Congress and Muslim league were the political parties of Hindu and Muslims respectively. Since congress was against the partition and wanted to see greater India, therefore they did not accept the independence of Pakistan, which put it in security dilemma because of large size, and population of India. And right after one year of independence newly born states get involved in a territorial war in 1948 followed by 1965, 1971 wars. After the defeat in 1971 war from India, Pakistan felt international humiliation and decided to have nuclear weapons in order to counter its four times larger enemy. Both countries successfully entered into nuclear club in 1998. In 1999 a limited territorial war broke out between them which lead both countries to brink of nuclear war, but presence of nuclear arsenals possessed by both states also prevented the full-fledge war and play the role of deterrence. Deterrence played effective role in prevention of war and it proved to be effective but there are limitations of deterrence and both nations paying high price for maintaining this deterrence. The instability in the region may cause the failure of deterrence, which can provoke them to use their nuclear arsenals, which cannot only be devastating for the region but also dangerous for world peace because of their strategic location. Along with deterrence peace and cooperation in the region is unavoidable for entire humanity. In the contemporary situation it’s like utopian to expect them to give up their nuclear armaments but at the same time both countries must focus on institutionalizing CBMs (Confidence building measures) to reduce enmity, bridge the gap of cooperation and interdependence on each other, and gradually aware the people of both countries that peace and cooperation can replace deterrence so that they could put pressure on their governments to make policies accordingly.
    In a region, with the history of violent conflicts, the importance of CBMs (Confidence building measures), cannot be underestimated, which are very important in reducing tensions, avoiding skirmishes, and pave the way toward peace and prosperity. Both countries, being traditional enemies and nuclear powered states, are in dire need to take measures to limit hostilities and reduce stiffness. The significance of CBMs has increased after entry of both countries into nuclear group. Military and Non-military CBMs in the region, with true spirit, are unavoidable for lasting peace and stability in the region. Though it is very hard to expect major output but at slightest CBMs between them can help in structuring an essential level of confidence among them for lasting peace and cooperation in the region and prevention of limited territorial war like ‘Kargil Crisis’ when both countries put their forces on borders and risk of nuclear war was evident. However, history of CBMs in South Asia is not inspiring because of some major impediments and confines, but still their importance cannot be ignored.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Chapter 1. Introduction 1
    • 1.1 Background of Study 1
    • 1.2 Statement of Problem 5
    • 1.3 Scope and Method of Study 7
    • Chapter 2. Analysis of Source of Conflict 9
    • Chapter 1. Introduction 1
    • 1.1 Background of Study 1
    • 1.2 Statement of Problem 5
    • 1.3 Scope and Method of Study 7
    • Chapter 2. Analysis of Source of Conflict 9
    • 2.1 Historical political and ideological skirmishes 9
    • 2.2 Division of Indian Subcontinent 12
    • 2.3 Territorial Conflicts 13
    • Chapter 3. Theoretical Background of Nuclear Deterrence 19
    • 3.1 The Concept of Nuclear Deterrence 22
    • 3.2 Requirements of Successful Deterrence 24
    • 3.2.1 Capability 25
    • 3.2.2 Credibility 26
    • 3.2.3 Communication 27
    • 3.3 Effectiveness of Nuclear Deterrence in South Asia 28
    • Chapter 4. Stability in South Asia 32
    • 4.1 Nexus between Economies and Defense Expenditures 33
    • 4.1.1 Socio-Economic Condition of India 34
    • 4.1.2 Socio-Economic Condition in Pakistan 36
    • 4.1.3 Defense Budget of India and Pakistan 37
    • 4.2 Deterrence and Stability in India and Pakistan 38
    • 4.3 Security Competition in South Asia 40
    • 4.4 Impact of Insurgency on Stability 41
    • Chapter 5. Confidence Building Measures 45
    • 5.1 Introduction to CBMs 46
    • 5.2 Importance of CBMs 47
    • 5.3 History of CBMs between India and Pakistan 50
    • 5.4 Framework of CBMs 51
    • 5.5 Major Challenges 57
    • Chapter 6.Conclusion and Recommendations 60
    • Bibliography 64
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼