RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    토지 경계 침범이 등기의 추정을 복멸하는지 여부 - 대법원 2023. 7. 13. 선고 2023다223591, 223607 판결 - = Whether the Encroachment on Land Boundaries Rebuts the Presumption of Registration - Supreme Court Decision 2023Da223591, 223607 Decided on July 13, 2023 -

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The presumptive power of registration is a crucial system that ensures the safety of real estate transactions. The Supreme Court decision under review is a precedent-setting judgment that applied the presumptive power of registration when multiple parties contested possession of a single piece of land. In this case, the issue was whether the presumptive power of registration was overturned by a building that encroached on the land, even when the ownership transfer registration for the encroached land was completed based on a final judgment due to the completion of acquisitive prescription.
    The judgment of the possessor should be faithful to the indication of actual control, and the concept of building site should also be considered. As long as exclusive possession is at issue, joint possession cannot be established, and the possessor must be identified. The actual controller of the encroached land and the possessor of the site as the building owner is the defendant. In contrast, the Supreme Court decision seems to have fallen into a dilemma regarding the recognition of the possessor by not overturning the presumption of rights of the person who acquired ownership through the completion of acquisitive prescription, despite the encroachment on the land boundary.
    Possession is essentially a matter of fact, and the presumptive power only arises from the registration of rights, not from the registration of facts. This is a natural consequence unless the presumptive power, equivalent to that of registration, is granted to the entries in the cadastral records. The notion of strengthened presumptive power of registration by a final judgment is problematic in light of the basic principles of civil litigation. Unlike the Supreme Court decision, the original judgment is more appropriate.
    번역하기

    The presumptive power of registration is a crucial system that ensures the safety of real estate transactions. The Supreme Court decision under review is a precedent-setting judgment that applied the presumptive power of registration when multiple par...

    The presumptive power of registration is a crucial system that ensures the safety of real estate transactions. The Supreme Court decision under review is a precedent-setting judgment that applied the presumptive power of registration when multiple parties contested possession of a single piece of land. In this case, the issue was whether the presumptive power of registration was overturned by a building that encroached on the land, even when the ownership transfer registration for the encroached land was completed based on a final judgment due to the completion of acquisitive prescription.
    The judgment of the possessor should be faithful to the indication of actual control, and the concept of building site should also be considered. As long as exclusive possession is at issue, joint possession cannot be established, and the possessor must be identified. The actual controller of the encroached land and the possessor of the site as the building owner is the defendant. In contrast, the Supreme Court decision seems to have fallen into a dilemma regarding the recognition of the possessor by not overturning the presumption of rights of the person who acquired ownership through the completion of acquisitive prescription, despite the encroachment on the land boundary.
    Possession is essentially a matter of fact, and the presumptive power only arises from the registration of rights, not from the registration of facts. This is a natural consequence unless the presumptive power, equivalent to that of registration, is granted to the entries in the cadastral records. The notion of strengthened presumptive power of registration by a final judgment is problematic in light of the basic principles of civil litigation. Unlike the Supreme Court decision, the original judgment is more appropriate.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼