RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      LESSONS FOR LESS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES  :  (THE JAPAN AND USA CASES)

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=E806641

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      For nearly three decades, one of my favorite examination questions, for undergraduate and graduate students alike, has been the following: “The year is 1840 just prior to the Opium War. You are comparing the potential of China and Japan for economic development over the next one hundred years. Which of the two countries would you choose as more likely to make the greatest progress? Why?” Most if not all of my students quite rationally, given the time constraint of 1840 vision, choose China. After all, in 1840 China had a land area and resources many times that of Japan, a much larger population and labor force, and by far the richer, more varied, more promising economic history. Japan, comprising only four small heavily mountainous islands in toto about the size of California, with limited inanimate and human resources and a relatively unimpressive economic history, hardly merited mention in the same breath as China. Of course, as we all know, the next century was marked by extraordinarily rapid development on the part of Japan rather than China. By 1914, Japan was the leading industrial power in Asia and by the 1930s, after acquiring Formosa (now called Taiwan), Korea, and Manchuria, felt able to challenge the USA economically and politically in the Pacific and brought on World War II.
      번역하기

      For nearly three decades, one of my favorite examination questions, for undergraduate and graduate students alike, has been the following: “The year is 1840 just prior to the Opium War. You are comparing the potential of China and Japan for economic...

      For nearly three decades, one of my favorite examination questions, for undergraduate and graduate students alike, has been the following: “The year is 1840 just prior to the Opium War. You are comparing the potential of China and Japan for economic development over the next one hundred years. Which of the two countries would you choose as more likely to make the greatest progress? Why?” Most if not all of my students quite rationally, given the time constraint of 1840 vision, choose China. After all, in 1840 China had a land area and resources many times that of Japan, a much larger population and labor force, and by far the richer, more varied, more promising economic history. Japan, comprising only four small heavily mountainous islands in toto about the size of California, with limited inanimate and human resources and a relatively unimpressive economic history, hardly merited mention in the same breath as China. Of course, as we all know, the next century was marked by extraordinarily rapid development on the part of Japan rather than China. By 1914, Japan was the leading industrial power in Asia and by the 1930s, after acquiring Formosa (now called Taiwan), Korea, and Manchuria, felt able to challenge the USA economically and politically in the Pacific and brought on World War II.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. Introduction
      • Ⅱ. Favorable Factors in Japan's Economic Development
      • Ⅲ. The USA as a Model for LDC
      • Ⅳ. Concluding Remarks
      • ·FOOTNOTES
      • Ⅰ. Introduction
      • Ⅱ. Favorable Factors in Japan's Economic Development
      • Ⅲ. The USA as a Model for LDC
      • Ⅳ. Concluding Remarks
      • ·FOOTNOTES
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼