RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      웹 기반 학습에서 텍스트형,아이콘형,메타포형 인터페이스가 학습수행에 미치는 영향 = The Effects of a Text, an Icon, and a Metaphor based Interface on Learning Performance in Web-based Learning

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101959806

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study aims at finding out how interfaces such as a text type, an icon type, and a metaphor type influence students on their learning performances in Web Based Learning. Detailed research problems are as follows: 1. Is there any differences on navigation path according In the types of interfaces (tex in-terface, icon interface, metaphor interface)? 2. Is there any differences on the academic attainments according In the types of interfaces(text interface, icon interface, metaphor interface)? In order to solve these problems of study, one hundred twenty students out of three classes who were in the six grade, of CheongJu elementary schhool were selected as sub- jects for this study. Learning assignment for this study was ``water pollution`` from ``environment rollution`` and ``nature preservation`` for six graders in the elementary school. Three programs of which contents are the same but the types are different were written in Jamba 2.1 which is a web authoring tool Collected data were analyzed with SPSSWIN package through the application of One-way ANOV A. The results from this study were as follows: 1. Total number of nodes each group studied are different(p<.05). The number for the icon interface`` group was the highest, next was the text interface``s group, and the metaphor interlace`` group had the lowest. 2. The frequency of access to the reference node was different by the three group:;(p<. 05). The iron interface``s group had the lowest, next was the text interface`` group, and the metaphor interface`` group had the highest 3. The academic attainments were different by the three groups(p<.05). The text inter-face`` group had the highest points on average of the academic attinments. Next was the metaphor interface``s group. The icon interface`` group had the lowest. Conclusions drawn from these results are as follows: First, the interlace type. could reasonably influence both on navigation path and on the attainments. The group used the text interface program had no trouble in accessing to in-formation they needed as well as in learning through it. Also, they had higher academic at-tainments. The group who used the icon interface program went through various and many nodes, but they had lower academic attainments due to misunderstanding the meaning of the icon. The group who used the metaphor interface program got a higher point in relation with the questions of the reference node than the group who used the .icon interface program did because they knew the meaning of the button clicked, though at first they didn``t go through many nodes because it took many hours for them to understand the meaning of the figure. Second, it is hard to say that the quantity of information gotten through the navigation on the program had a direct influence on the academic attainments, but it is possible to insist that the quantity of information from the time when learners exactly know the meaning of the icon or the button has a positive influence on the academic attainments. Third, interface design which is used for the sense of beauty makes the students get confused. This means that presenting as a text is better than the metaphor unless presented with the clear understandable image for the students.
      번역하기

      This study aims at finding out how interfaces such as a text type, an icon type, and a metaphor type influence students on their learning performances in Web Based Learning. Detailed research problems are as follows: 1. Is there any differences on nav...

      This study aims at finding out how interfaces such as a text type, an icon type, and a metaphor type influence students on their learning performances in Web Based Learning. Detailed research problems are as follows: 1. Is there any differences on navigation path according In the types of interfaces (tex in-terface, icon interface, metaphor interface)? 2. Is there any differences on the academic attainments according In the types of interfaces(text interface, icon interface, metaphor interface)? In order to solve these problems of study, one hundred twenty students out of three classes who were in the six grade, of CheongJu elementary schhool were selected as sub- jects for this study. Learning assignment for this study was ``water pollution`` from ``environment rollution`` and ``nature preservation`` for six graders in the elementary school. Three programs of which contents are the same but the types are different were written in Jamba 2.1 which is a web authoring tool Collected data were analyzed with SPSSWIN package through the application of One-way ANOV A. The results from this study were as follows: 1. Total number of nodes each group studied are different(p<.05). The number for the icon interface`` group was the highest, next was the text interface``s group, and the metaphor interlace`` group had the lowest. 2. The frequency of access to the reference node was different by the three group:;(p<. 05). The iron interface``s group had the lowest, next was the text interface`` group, and the metaphor interface`` group had the highest 3. The academic attainments were different by the three groups(p<.05). The text inter-face`` group had the highest points on average of the academic attinments. Next was the metaphor interface``s group. The icon interface`` group had the lowest. Conclusions drawn from these results are as follows: First, the interlace type. could reasonably influence both on navigation path and on the attainments. The group used the text interface program had no trouble in accessing to in-formation they needed as well as in learning through it. Also, they had higher academic at-tainments. The group who used the icon interface program went through various and many nodes, but they had lower academic attainments due to misunderstanding the meaning of the icon. The group who used the metaphor interface program got a higher point in relation with the questions of the reference node than the group who used the .icon interface program did because they knew the meaning of the button clicked, though at first they didn``t go through many nodes because it took many hours for them to understand the meaning of the figure. Second, it is hard to say that the quantity of information gotten through the navigation on the program had a direct influence on the academic attainments, but it is possible to insist that the quantity of information from the time when learners exactly know the meaning of the icon or the button has a positive influence on the academic attainments. Third, interface design which is used for the sense of beauty makes the students get confused. This means that presenting as a text is better than the metaphor unless presented with the clear understandable image for the students.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼