RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      지역문화실태조사를 활용한 지역 유형화와 군집 변화 분석: 2020년과 2023년의 비교를 중심으로 = Regional Typology and Cluster Transition Analysis Based on the Statistics on Environments and Policies of Regional Culture: A Comparison of 2020 and 2023

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109927162

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Regional culture is shaped through the complex interplay of cultural infrastructure, administrative capacity, and levels of civic participation. Although various policy efforts have been implemented to support this, disparities in cultural environments across regions remain evident. This highlights the need for a structural diagnosis of cultural gaps and the formulation of tailored policy strategies that reflect the specific characteristics of each region. This study analyzes the cultural environments of 229 municipalities in South Korea using data from the 2020 and 2023 Statistics on Environments and Policies of Regional Culture. Based on 18 comparable indicators across the two years, a k-means cluster analysis classified the regions into five types: Regional Culture Leading Type(1), Basic Regional Culture Type(2), Cultural Project-Focused Type(3), Culture Budget Input-Based Type(4) and Low-Activity Regional Culture Type(5). Cluster transitions were observed in 49 municipalities. A comparison with administratively designated vulnerable areas in the cultural environment revealed discrepancies between data-driven classifications and official categorizations. This study provides an empirical understanding of changes in cultural policy conditions across regions and offers a foundation for setting policy priorities and formulating strategies tailored to the characteristics of each regional cluster.
      번역하기

      Regional culture is shaped through the complex interplay of cultural infrastructure, administrative capacity, and levels of civic participation. Although various policy efforts have been implemented to support this, disparities in cultural environment...

      Regional culture is shaped through the complex interplay of cultural infrastructure, administrative capacity, and levels of civic participation. Although various policy efforts have been implemented to support this, disparities in cultural environments across regions remain evident. This highlights the need for a structural diagnosis of cultural gaps and the formulation of tailored policy strategies that reflect the specific characteristics of each region. This study analyzes the cultural environments of 229 municipalities in South Korea using data from the 2020 and 2023 Statistics on Environments and Policies of Regional Culture. Based on 18 comparable indicators across the two years, a k-means cluster analysis classified the regions into five types: Regional Culture Leading Type(1), Basic Regional Culture Type(2), Cultural Project-Focused Type(3), Culture Budget Input-Based Type(4) and Low-Activity Regional Culture Type(5). Cluster transitions were observed in 49 municipalities. A comparison with administratively designated vulnerable areas in the cultural environment revealed discrepancies between data-driven classifications and official categorizations. This study provides an empirical understanding of changes in cultural policy conditions across regions and offers a foundation for setting policy priorities and formulating strategies tailored to the characteristics of each regional cluster.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼