RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Analysis of Modern China’s Summit Network

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104500171

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This research aims to study Chinese diplomacy in terms of networks. With the gradual rise of interest in Chinese diplomacy and the invigoration of network theory in various academic spheres, examining Chinese diplomacy in terms of networks is meaningful for both scholarship and policy.
    Perceiving among the various diplomatic networks the symbolism and importance of summits carried out by national leaders, this research articulates Chinese-led summits in terms of networks, which are then analyzed in order to examine the diplomacy of modern China. As a result, this study reaffirmed the existing research achievements through the network analysis, and was able to make the contents clearer which have been discussed in rather obscured way. At the same time, it was able to solidify the understanding of the Chinese diplomacy more by revealing graphs and maps with regard to the PRC’s diplomatic pattern via the analysis of the summit network.
    First, given the trend of annually held summits, we could examine the transitions and periodic characteristics of Chinese diplomacy. Also, by using graphs to visualize the summit network, we could not only verify at a glance at which period and with which state China had held active summit conferences during the past 60 years, but also discover the structural attributes of the summit network. Moreover, the ‘standardized actor degree centrality’, which measures the summit counterparts of China, enabled a more concrete assessment of the major partner for each period.
    On the other hand, by creating a map showing China’s major summit partners in each period, we could examine summit diplomacy in terms of its geographical development as well as the “One Belt, One Road” initiative highlighted by the Xi Jinping’s regime.
    As there are limits to explaining all the diplomacy by mere analysis of summits, more diverse aspects of Chinese diplomacy should be examined in the future by unveiling and analyzing other networks established by Chinese diplomacy.
    번역하기

    This research aims to study Chinese diplomacy in terms of networks. With the gradual rise of interest in Chinese diplomacy and the invigoration of network theory in various academic spheres, examining Chinese diplomacy in terms of networks is meaningf...

    This research aims to study Chinese diplomacy in terms of networks. With the gradual rise of interest in Chinese diplomacy and the invigoration of network theory in various academic spheres, examining Chinese diplomacy in terms of networks is meaningful for both scholarship and policy.
    Perceiving among the various diplomatic networks the symbolism and importance of summits carried out by national leaders, this research articulates Chinese-led summits in terms of networks, which are then analyzed in order to examine the diplomacy of modern China. As a result, this study reaffirmed the existing research achievements through the network analysis, and was able to make the contents clearer which have been discussed in rather obscured way. At the same time, it was able to solidify the understanding of the Chinese diplomacy more by revealing graphs and maps with regard to the PRC’s diplomatic pattern via the analysis of the summit network.
    First, given the trend of annually held summits, we could examine the transitions and periodic characteristics of Chinese diplomacy. Also, by using graphs to visualize the summit network, we could not only verify at a glance at which period and with which state China had held active summit conferences during the past 60 years, but also discover the structural attributes of the summit network. Moreover, the ‘standardized actor degree centrality’, which measures the summit counterparts of China, enabled a more concrete assessment of the major partner for each period.
    On the other hand, by creating a map showing China’s major summit partners in each period, we could examine summit diplomacy in terms of its geographical development as well as the “One Belt, One Road” initiative highlighted by the Xi Jinping’s regime.
    As there are limits to explaining all the diplomacy by mere analysis of summits, more diverse aspects of Chinese diplomacy should be examined in the future by unveiling and analyzing other networks established by Chinese diplomacy.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/centres/css/ant/ant.htm"

    2 "http://www.insna.org/"

    3 "http://p2pfoundation.net/Exploring_New_Configurations_of_Network_ Politics"

    4 Shen, D. W., "Zhongguo waijiao 60nian bianqian" 17 (17): 110-117, 2008

    5 CCTV, "Yidaiyilu gongjian fanrong: Yidaiyilu gei jiu fa xin lantu"

    6 REN MIN WANG, "Tuidong gongjian sichouzhilu jingjidai he 21 shiji haishang sichouzhilu de yuanjing yu xingdong"

    7 Pollack, Jonathan D, "The Sino-Soviet Rivalry and Chinese Security Debate" The Rand Corporation 1982

    8 Cumings, Bruce, "The Political Economy of China’s Turn Outward, in China and the World" Westview Press 1989

    9 Schwartz, Benjamin J., "The Maoist Image of World Order" 11 (11): 92-102, 1967

    10 Ng-Quinn, Michael, "The Analytic Study of Chinese Foreign Policy" 27 (27): 203-224, 1983

    1 "http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/centres/css/ant/ant.htm"

    2 "http://www.insna.org/"

    3 "http://p2pfoundation.net/Exploring_New_Configurations_of_Network_ Politics"

    4 Shen, D. W., "Zhongguo waijiao 60nian bianqian" 17 (17): 110-117, 2008

    5 CCTV, "Yidaiyilu gongjian fanrong: Yidaiyilu gei jiu fa xin lantu"

    6 REN MIN WANG, "Tuidong gongjian sichouzhilu jingjidai he 21 shiji haishang sichouzhilu de yuanjing yu xingdong"

    7 Pollack, Jonathan D, "The Sino-Soviet Rivalry and Chinese Security Debate" The Rand Corporation 1982

    8 Cumings, Bruce, "The Political Economy of China’s Turn Outward, in China and the World" Westview Press 1989

    9 Schwartz, Benjamin J., "The Maoist Image of World Order" 11 (11): 92-102, 1967

    10 Ng-Quinn, Michael, "The Analytic Study of Chinese Foreign Policy" 27 (27): 203-224, 1983

    11 Kwak, G. Y., "Social Network Analysis" Chungram 2014

    12 Kim, Y. H., "Social Network Analysis" Pakyoungsa 2011

    13 Zhang, Q. M., "Shou nao chu fang yu zhong guo wai jiao" 45 (45): 1-20, 2008

    14 Sungkyun Institute of China Studies, "One belt, One road Digest" Dasanbooks 2016

    15 Hah, Y. S., "Network World Politics" Cultural Center of Publication of Seoul National University 2010

    16 Mori, K. K., "Modern Chinese Politics" Hanul Publishing Group 2013

    17 Hong, J. P., "Modern Chinese Diplomacy" Nanam 2011

    18 Lee, S. S., "Methodology of the Network Analysis" Nonhyung 2012

    19 Tsou, Tang, "Mao Tse-Tung’s Revolutionary Strategy and Peking’s International Behavior" 59 (59): 80-99, 1965

    20 Zhao, Q. S., "Interpreting Chinese Foreign Policy: The Micro-Macro Linkage Approach" Oruem 2000

    21 Reuters, "Germany to be fourth-biggest shareholder in AIIB – document"

    22 Bachman, David, "Domestic Sources of Chinese Foreign Policy, in China and the World: New Directions in Chinese Foreign Relations" Westview Press 1989

    23 Lieberthal, Kenneth, "Domestic Politics and Foreign Policy, in China’s Foreign Relations In the 1980s" Yale University Press 1984

    24 Wang, X. B., "Dangdai zhongguo waijiao lishi fenqi wenti shuping" 43 (43): 69-74, 2010

    25 Lee, C. H, "Dangdai zhongguo waijiao de genben zhuanxing yu fenqi wenti: Yi ge waijiao zhengce fenxi lilun de shijiao" (107) : 27-36, 2008

    26 Teiwes, Frederic C., "Chinese Politics, 1949-1965: A Changing Mao" 12 : 1-18,

    27 Gottlieb, Thomas, "Chinese Foreign Policy Factionalism and the Origins of the Strategic Triangle" The Rand Corporation 1997

    28 Geng, X. D, "Chinese Diplomacy" Renmin Publishing House 2011

    29 Okabe, T. M., "China’s foreign strategy" Tokyo University Press 2001

    30 Ross, Madelyn, "China’s International Economic Behavior, in Chinese Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice" Oxford University Press 1994

    31 Manncall, Mark, "China at the Center: 300 Years of Foreign Policy" Free Press 1984

    32 Borgatti, S. P., "Analyzing Social Networks" SAGE Publications Inc 2013

    33 Heo, J. C., "A Study on the Network Between China’s Korean Experts and the Korean Press : Mainly focusing on the Realm of Politics and Economics by SNA" 13 (13): 1-22, 2015

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.51 0.51 0.44
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.39 0.43 0.604 0.34
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼