RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      민사소송의 전자화에 관한 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104728938

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study's aim is not primarily to catalogue new developments, but to consider on a comparative basis the impact of these new developments on civil procedure.
      What impact has the information technology revolution had on civil procedure? What use are we making of new technologies in the civil justice system? How are these advances affecting our traditional procedural values? These questions are for comparative analysis by looking at the realities of IT developments in the various countries that show similarities as well as divergences.
      New technologies are re-shaping the ways that we record and store information in the litigation process, the ways that the participants in the process communicate with one another, and the ways in which the case record or file is developed.
      With new technologies we hope to find ways to make the litigation process more efficient, more accessible to all participants, and more effective.
      In our country, 'Act on the use of electronic documents in civil procedure' permits courts to use electronic filing and case-management system. This new system is now available in patent court and will be implemented every court step by step in the future.
      번역하기

      This study's aim is not primarily to catalogue new developments, but to consider on a comparative basis the impact of these new developments on civil procedure. What impact has the information technology revolution had on civil procedure? What use are...

      This study's aim is not primarily to catalogue new developments, but to consider on a comparative basis the impact of these new developments on civil procedure.
      What impact has the information technology revolution had on civil procedure? What use are we making of new technologies in the civil justice system? How are these advances affecting our traditional procedural values? These questions are for comparative analysis by looking at the realities of IT developments in the various countries that show similarities as well as divergences.
      New technologies are re-shaping the ways that we record and store information in the litigation process, the ways that the participants in the process communicate with one another, and the ways in which the case record or file is developed.
      With new technologies we hope to find ways to make the litigation process more efficient, more accessible to all participants, and more effective.
      In our country, 'Act on the use of electronic documents in civil procedure' permits courts to use electronic filing and case-management system. This new system is now available in patent court and will be implemented every court step by step in the future.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study's aim is not primarily to catalogue new developments, but to consider on a comparative basis the impact of these new developments on civil procedure.
      What impact has the information technology revolution had on civil procedure? What use are we making of new technologies in the civil justice system? How are these advances affecting our traditional procedural values? These questions are for comparative analysis by looking at the realities of IT developments in the various countries that show similarities as well as divergences.
      New technologies are re-shaping the ways that we record and store information in the litigation process, the ways that the participants in the process communicate with one another, and the ways in which the case record or file is developed.
      With new technologies we hope to find ways to make the litigation process more efficient, more accessible to all participants, and more effective.
      In our country, 'Act on the use of electronic documents in civil procedure' permits courts to use electronic filing and case-management system. This new system is now available in patent court and will be implemented every court step by step in the future.
      번역하기

      This study's aim is not primarily to catalogue new developments, but to consider on a comparative basis the impact of these new developments on civil procedure. What impact has the information technology revolution had on civil procedure? What use ar...

      This study's aim is not primarily to catalogue new developments, but to consider on a comparative basis the impact of these new developments on civil procedure.
      What impact has the information technology revolution had on civil procedure? What use are we making of new technologies in the civil justice system? How are these advances affecting our traditional procedural values? These questions are for comparative analysis by looking at the realities of IT developments in the various countries that show similarities as well as divergences.
      New technologies are re-shaping the ways that we record and store information in the litigation process, the ways that the participants in the process communicate with one another, and the ways in which the case record or file is developed.
      With new technologies we hope to find ways to make the litigation process more efficient, more accessible to all participants, and more effective.
      In our country, 'Act on the use of electronic documents in civil procedure' permits courts to use electronic filing and case-management system. This new system is now available in patent court and will be implemented every court step by step in the future.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 유병현, "전자소송절차 – 전자소송법안을 중심으로 –" 한국민사소송법학회 14 (14): 193-229, 2010

      2 함윤식, "전자소송 관련 법령의 주요 내용과 쟁점" 2011

      3 정영수, "전자법원과 전자ADR" 법무부 (34) : 131-152, 2006

      4 우세나, "민사소송절차의 전자소송화에 대한 고찰 - 민사소송 서류의 전자문서화를 중심으로 -" 한국민사소송법학회 13 (13): 100-124, 2009

      5 황경환, "미국 민사소송법상 전자문서의 증거개시제도의 연구" 한양법학회 (22) : 458-485, 2008

      6 Andy Seldon, "The Hidden Hazards of E-Filing - Sophisticated Searchers of Public Records can Spur Identity Fraud"

      7 A.M.Lagomarsino, "Strategic Use of Video Depositions" 11 : 2005

      8 Henry Gottlieb, "Plaintiffs' Lawyers Have High-Tech Advantage in Courtroom"

      9 "New Trends in Procedural Law" 2007

      10 "New Technologies and the Civil Litigation Process. Orna Rabinovich-Einy, Report from Israel"

      1 유병현, "전자소송절차 – 전자소송법안을 중심으로 –" 한국민사소송법학회 14 (14): 193-229, 2010

      2 함윤식, "전자소송 관련 법령의 주요 내용과 쟁점" 2011

      3 정영수, "전자법원과 전자ADR" 법무부 (34) : 131-152, 2006

      4 우세나, "민사소송절차의 전자소송화에 대한 고찰 - 민사소송 서류의 전자문서화를 중심으로 -" 한국민사소송법학회 13 (13): 100-124, 2009

      5 황경환, "미국 민사소송법상 전자문서의 증거개시제도의 연구" 한양법학회 (22) : 458-485, 2008

      6 Andy Seldon, "The Hidden Hazards of E-Filing - Sophisticated Searchers of Public Records can Spur Identity Fraud"

      7 A.M.Lagomarsino, "Strategic Use of Video Depositions" 11 : 2005

      8 Henry Gottlieb, "Plaintiffs' Lawyers Have High-Tech Advantage in Courtroom"

      9 "New Trends in Procedural Law" 2007

      10 "New Technologies and the Civil Litigation Process. Orna Rabinovich-Einy, Report from Israel"

      11 Adam Johnson, "New Technologies and the Civil Litigation Process, Report for England and Wales"

      12 Timothy Pinos, "New Technologies and the Civil Litigation Process"

      13 Garry D. Watson, "New Technologies and the Civil Litigation Process"

      14 Betsy Reynolds, "Litigation Support: Anticipating the Courts' Moves, Manatt Phelps Sets up E-Filing Protocols 11"

      15 Jonathan Lippman, "E-Filing: Time To Ride the Paperless Wave" N.Y.L.J 2006

      16 Robert D.Brownstone, "Collaborative Navigation of the Stormy e-Discovery Seas" 10 : 2004

      17 Melbourne, Australian Institute for Judicial Administration, "Australian Institute for Judicial Administration, "Technology for Justice--2002 Report" by Jeff Leeuwenburg & Anne Wallace"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.31 0.31 0.49
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.54 0.5 0.606 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼