근대성 창출의 또 다른 길 -초기 잡문을 통해 본 루쉰의 근대적 사유- = The study on Lu Xun(魯迅)` morden thought in the early proses

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper aims to review Lu Xun`` the early proses. The proses written in his studying in Japan contain his own thoughts on modernity. Commonly Lu Xun``s psychological structure is called ‘contradiction structure’. Lu Xun``s contradiction structure functions the intrinsic methodology for understanding historical realities. I pay attention to this structure, which takes the form of layered interplay between tradition and anti-tradition. Lu Xun stresses the practice of ‘liren(立人)’ to develop one``s personality and mind. This is in effect equivalent to development of self-identity as modern subject. A supreme example of ‘liren(立人)’ is a ‘superman’, that is to say a ‘warrior of the mental world’, who has stern attitude and high moral standards. In this respect, Lu Xun`` superman closely resembles a saint of Confucianism. By interconnecting its traditional ideal of saint, thesuperman who defies existing convention and exercise his free will exemplifies a role model of modern subject repeatedly emphasized by Lu Xun. Meanwhile, Lu Xun regards biased motions as the nature of history. This viewpoint on history is very different from traditional Chinese thoughts understanding the nature of things on the basis of the golden mean(中庸). But modern civilization is not able to stand upright unless biased motions of history are overcome. Lu Xun seems to think that the desirable direction of historical development is to achieve a balance and harmony between material civilization and moral culture. This thought is formed from re- appropriation of the golden mean. Lu Xun``s reappropriation of the golden mean, however, is dissimilar to conventional Sinocentrism, for the former underlines historical variability and relativity as opposed to the latter. Defying national tradition and his mother culture and recreating and re- constructing them, Lu Xun takes a view of western modernity``s faults and limits. Lu Xun``s ideas that eschews Sinocentrism is worth remembering as the very historical example of giving us insight about the proposal of ‘Eastern modernity’, namely decolonial modernity that sharply criticizes western imperialism and rejects a blind imitation of western civilization.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 권혁률, "춘원과 루쉰에 관한 비교문학적 연구" 인하대학교 대학원 2003

2 양조한, "중용철학" 서광사 1999

3 조경란, "중국에서 근대적 개인(주체)의 존재방식에 관한 문제" 한국철학사상연구회 17 (17): 81-100, 2006

4 왕후이, "절망에 대한 반항, 루쉰" 문학과지성사 1997

5 김경연, "이광수와 루쉰의 비교문학적 고찰-초기 평론 및 소설을 중심으로" 39 : 2002

6 첸리췬, "사상가로서의 루쉰, In 루쉰" 문학과지성사 1997

7 루쉰, "무덤-노신 잡문집" 선학사 2001

8 홍석표, "루쉰의 정신구조-모순의 통일적 주체" 한국중국현대문학학회 (31) : 141-174, 2004

9 방준호, "루쉰과 중국문화 - 근대 이후 계몽주의 사조와 루쉰" 중국어문논역학회 (24) : 749-774, 2009

10 취안 허 뤼, "루쉰, 춘원과 일본 근대초기의 사소설" 아시아문화연구소 22 : 173-194, 2011

11 林非, "루쉰, 국민성을 논하다" 중국어문논역학회 (28) : 495-522, 2011

12 루쉰, "루쉰 문집Ⅵ" 일월서각 1987

13 다케우치 요시미, "루쉰" 문학과지성사 2003

14 히야마 히사오, "동양적 근대의 창출" 소명 2000

15 김계환, "동아시아적 ‘개인’의 등장: 루쉰의 ‘탈식민적 개인주의’에 관한 시론" 현대중국학회 11 (11): 229-261, 2010

16 이동환, "대학/중용" 나남출판사 2000

17 이상옥, "니체와 근대 중국의 사상 -왕국유와 노신에 미친 영향을 중심으로-" 한국니체학회 (15) : 251-283, 2009