RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보 SCOPUS

      응급의료센터와 중환자실에서 소아 중환자의 예후인자 예측을 위한 PELOD Score와 PIM 2 Score의 유용성 = The Values of the Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) Score and the Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM) 2 Score in Emergency Department and Intensive Care Unit

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103917531

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: This study was conducted to compare two models of the pediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD) score and the pediatric index of mortality (PIM) 2 score in the emergency department (ED) and intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: 90 pediatr...

      Background: This study was conducted to compare two models of the pediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD) score and the pediatric index of mortality (PIM) 2 score in the emergency department (ED) and intensive care unit (ICU).
      Methods: 90 pediatric patients who were admitted to the ICU in ED from January 2003 to December 2008 were enrolled in this study. PELOD score and PIM 2 score calculations were performed in the ED and ICU. We classified these patients into either the survivor or non-survivor groups and analyzed the clinical variables between two groups. We used Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests to evaluate calibration, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and standardized mortality ratio (SMR).
      Results: Among the 90 pediatric patients, 56 (62.2%) were male, and 9 (10.0%) patients died. Expected mortalities were PIM 2 = 10.35, PELOD = 8.33 in ED and PIM 2 = 8.84, PELOD = 8.26 in ICU. PIM 2 showed fit calibration (x2 = 6.228, p = 0.622) in the ED. In the ICU, both PELOD and PIM 2 showed calibration (x2 =4.625, p = 0.185) and (x2 = 7.616, p = 0.472), respectively. PIM 2 in ED showed the best discrimination, with area under the curve (AUC) = 0.949 (95% CI, 0.881−0.984).
      Conclusions: PIM 2 score in ED was fit. Also, PELOD and PIM 2 score in ICU was fit. But PELOD in ED was unfit.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김정순, "소아중환자를 대상으로 한 PIM Ⅱ의 타당도 평가" 한국간호과학회 35 (35): 47-55, 2005

      2 황희승, "단일 병원에서 소아 중환자의 예후인자 예측을 위한 PIM2 (pediatric index of mortality 2)와 PRIMS III (pediatric risk of mortality)의 유효성 평가 - 후향적 조사 -" 대한소아과학회 51 (51): 1158-1164, 2008

      3 Leteurtre S, "Validation of the paediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD) score: prospective, observational, multicentre study" 362 : 192-197, 2003

      4 Eulmesekian PG, "Validation of pediatric index of mortality 2 (PIM2) in a single pediatric intensive care unit of Argentina" 8 : 54-57, 2007

      5 Slater A, "The suitability of the Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM), PIM2, the Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM), and PRISM III for monitoring the quality of pediatric intensive care in Australia and New Zealand" 5 : 447-454, 2004

      6 Ozer EA, "The Comparison of PRISM and PIM scoring systems for mortality risk in infantile intensive care" 50 : 334-338, 2004

      7 Gemke RJ, "Scoring systems in pediatric intensive care: PRISM III versus PIM" 28 : 204-207, 2002

      8 Wolfler A, "Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 score in Italy: a multicenter, prospective, observational study" 33 : 1407-1413, 2007

      9 Shann F, "Paediatric index of mortality (PIM): a mortality prediction model for children in intensive care" 23 : 201-207, 1997

      10 Slater A, "PIM2: a revised version of the Paediatric Index of Mortality" 29 : 278-285, 2003

      1 김정순, "소아중환자를 대상으로 한 PIM Ⅱ의 타당도 평가" 한국간호과학회 35 (35): 47-55, 2005

      2 황희승, "단일 병원에서 소아 중환자의 예후인자 예측을 위한 PIM2 (pediatric index of mortality 2)와 PRIMS III (pediatric risk of mortality)의 유효성 평가 - 후향적 조사 -" 대한소아과학회 51 (51): 1158-1164, 2008

      3 Leteurtre S, "Validation of the paediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD) score: prospective, observational, multicentre study" 362 : 192-197, 2003

      4 Eulmesekian PG, "Validation of pediatric index of mortality 2 (PIM2) in a single pediatric intensive care unit of Argentina" 8 : 54-57, 2007

      5 Slater A, "The suitability of the Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM), PIM2, the Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM), and PRISM III for monitoring the quality of pediatric intensive care in Australia and New Zealand" 5 : 447-454, 2004

      6 Ozer EA, "The Comparison of PRISM and PIM scoring systems for mortality risk in infantile intensive care" 50 : 334-338, 2004

      7 Gemke RJ, "Scoring systems in pediatric intensive care: PRISM III versus PIM" 28 : 204-207, 2002

      8 Wolfler A, "Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 score in Italy: a multicenter, prospective, observational study" 33 : 1407-1413, 2007

      9 Shann F, "Paediatric index of mortality (PIM): a mortality prediction model for children in intensive care" 23 : 201-207, 1997

      10 Slater A, "PIM2: a revised version of the Paediatric Index of Mortality" 29 : 278-285, 2003

      11 Qureshi AU, "Comparison of three prognostic scores (PRISM, PELOD and PIM 2) at pediatric intensive care unit under Pakistani circumstances" 19 : 49-53, 2007

      12 Pearson GA, "Calibration of the paediatric index of mortality in UK paediatric intensive care units" 84 : 125-128, 2001

      13 Choi KM, "Assessment of the Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM) and the Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) III score for prediction of mortality in a paediatric intensive care unit in Hong Kong" 11 : 97-103, 2005

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2025 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2021-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (재인증) KCI등재후보
      2018-02-28 학술지명변경 한글명 : The Korean Journal of Critical Care Medicine -> Acute and Critical Care
      외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Critical Care Medicine -> Acute and Critical Care
      KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2016-06-24 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한중환자의학회지 -> The Korean Journal of Critical Care Medicine
      외국어명 : The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine -> The Korean Journal of Critical Care Medicine
      KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.07 0.07 0.09
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.1 0.08 0.289 0.12
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼